![]() |
IMO the W in Shanghai stands out as a W that has properly executed on the brand concept.
|
Not all Ws are of the same breed!!
I fell in love with the W brand after my initial stays at W Seoul (still missed), Singapore, Bangkok, Istanbul ... and then was unpleasantly shocked after staying at the Ws in NYC (Union Sq. and Times Sq) - what a letdown! It felt criminal that the two sets share the same brand name given how stark the differences were in EVERYTHING (quality of Hardware, service, F&B etc). The ones in Europe were in between the two (e.g. W Paris) - not as good as the ones in Asia but far better than the ones in the US. There is still a part of me that enjoys walking into my hotel lobby at night that is thumping with a DJ spinning electro and the crowd dancing the night away. |
Similar to my own experience. good experience in W Singapore yet very disappointing stay at W Hollywood.
Would love to try W Seminyak and W Melbourne if I have chance to fly there. |
<canceled>
|
Originally Posted by JNelson113
(Post 32846711)
Indeed. One of the few hotels I've ever immediately checked out of was the W New York. This was around 2004 or so. Tons of attitude at the front desk from the hipper than thou folks. I was a platinum but received a room so small that I could touch the wall from both sides of the bed. Just all around unpleasant for the price. There are almost always better options.
As an attorney, I wouldn't hold a business meeting at most W's, but it's a great place to stay when relaxing with friends or the family. |
Originally Posted by Isochronous
(Post 32983640)
IMO the W in Shanghai stands out as a W that has properly executed on the brand concept.
I don’t like W’s because they don’t have lounges where I can get free food and booze. Why would I stay in a W when a hotel down the street will give me a three hour free happy hour on a nightly basis? But I’m obviously a grumpy, parsimonious, middle aged man who is definitely not their target demo. I’m sure they won’t miss me 😁 |
Originally Posted by kaizen7
(Post 32984037)
Similar to my own experience. good experience in W Singapore yet very disappointing stay at W Hollywood.
Would love to try W Seminyak and W Melbourne if I have chance to fly there. In terms of vibe, very different to the clubby/youthful feel I get in other Ws (perhaps the age is skewing slightly older due to less tourists atm?), though the room scent is still very familiar. No colored lighting in the rooms unless I didn't look hard enough but even around the lobby and bar/restaurant it wasn't as in your face as I've seen elsewhere. The cocktails are amazing and it's on the beach but the waves are pretty strong for prolonged time in the water. When I return in early Feb I'll post a covid review (though with only 1 bar and 1 restaurant open I havent/most likely won't be able to scratch the surface of what the hotel truly has to offer until March). |
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 32986363)
I agree. The hotel is full of attention seekers taking perfectly curated selfies in the pool with the silver W and Pudong skyline in the background. Ready made for we chat moments or Instagram posting. It’s the perfect hotel for the vapid culture of wannabe influencers that has blossomed in China like nowhere else.
I don’t like W’s because they don’t have lounges where I can get free food and booze. Why would I stay in a W when a hotel down the street will give me a three hour free happy hour on a nightly basis? But I’m obviously a grumpy, parsimonious, middle aged man who is definitely not their target demo. I’m sure they won’t miss me 😁 |
I revisited W last year having not tried one since early this century in Sydney which was the first of the chain outside of North America. In this case it was Brisbane, found the rooms excellent service great and platinum recognition consistent. From memory across the ten or so stays the welcome gift was substantial and never the same, while the food was also a standout. Looking forward to trying the brand in other Australian cities soon as they expand.
|
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
(Post 32986363)
I agree. The hotel is full of attention seekers taking perfectly curated selfies in the pool with the silver W and Pudong skyline in the background. Ready made for we chat moments or Instagram posting. It’s the perfect hotel for the vapid culture of wannabe influencers that has blossomed in China like nowhere else.
I don’t like W’s because they don’t have lounges where I can get free food and booze. Why would I stay in a W when a hotel down the street will give me a three hour free happy hour on a nightly basis? But I’m obviously a grumpy, parsimonious, middle aged man who is definitely not their target demo. I’m sure they won’t miss me 😁 |
I am taking my nephews (ages 19 and 22) to SF and thought they'd like the W for a Marriott choice. What about location? A lot of hotels aren't serving food now and I want there to be options outside of hotel.
|
Originally Posted by deatrice
(Post 33055851)
I am taking my nephews (ages 19 and 22) to SF and thought they'd like the W for a Marriott choice. What about location? A lot of hotels aren't serving food now and I want there to be options outside of hotel.
|
Originally Posted by cmd320
(Post 33057703)
Honestly if dining options are important to you California is the wrong place to be going...
Most locals their age (at least the 22 year old), spend time in the Mission district (valencia st) or the Marina district (Union St) and Russian Hill (Polk st). lost of options for morning coffee, good restaurants, nightlife, and for marina/russian hill, doing a run along the marina green towards the golden gate bridge. I haven't been but believe the outdoor dining scene on valencia and union st are pretty good. don't know about polk st. Mission district wouldn't be too bad of a schlep from the W, although you might consider the Proper hotel as also edgy and fun. The hotel itself is in a bit of a dodgy (albeit safe) spot, but would be much closer to mission. Closest marriott property to marina and russian hill would be in fisherman's wharf which is two neighborhoods over. Fisherman's wharf itself, and the marriott property there, would both be lame...but much closer to where they want to be...or at least where I would have wanted to be at that age. But back to the original point, if the goal is to experience the city and not just the tourist attractions, unclear you'd get what you want given california has the most aggressive lockdowns in the US right now. |
I alway enjoy taking the Golden Gate Ferry to Larkspur, having lunch at Marin Brewery (minors permitted in that restaurant), and returning — all counter-commute. There are nice views passing Alcatraz, Angel Island, and San Quentin Prison. The price is much lower than a tourist cruise.
From the W Hotel, one can walk to the S.F. Ferry Building, or take the Muni or BART down Market Street to the Embarcadero. (This and the three preceeding posts should probably be moved to a hotel-specific or city-specific thread.) |
Originally Posted by cfabar1
(Post 32846137)
I’m trying to figure out what Marriott’s long term strategy is with W Hotels. They keep culling the herd, with another property, the Buckhead (Atlanta) location about to become an Autograph Collection Hotel
https://whatnowatlanta.com/hotel-col...anta-buckhead/ Marriott considers W Hotels part of their luxury portfolio, but not Autograph Hotels. That said, it seems odd to me that W Hotels are put in the same tier as properties in the St. Regis Collection for example. Are they culling the herd to make it more luxurious? And EDITION, while seeing to try to get a similar customer, couldn’t have a more different vibe. How do those two brands intersect? Based on the hotel developers brand web pages, at year end 2020: "Luxury": W hotels: 59 open properties / 38 pipeline properties / 16,452 open rooms / 9,004 pipeline rooms (W Hotels - Marriott Hotels Development) St Regis: 46 open properties / 32 pipeline properties / 10,017 open rooms / 6,738 pipeline rooms (St. Regis - Marriott Hotels Development) Edition: 11 open properties / 15 pipeline properties / 2,697 open rooms / 3,356 pipeline rooms (EDITION - Marriott Hotels Development) "Premium" Autograph: 209 open properties / 91 pipeline properties / 40,553 open rooms / 15,550 pipeline rooms (Autograph Collection - Marriott Hotels Development) David |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:06 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.