![]() |
The KLM erosion thread
Reading through this forum I strongly feel that many amongst us have had enough of it. A lot of dissatisfaction can be heard when KLM once again erodes the quality of their product and frequent flyer benefits.
When reading individual cases we may sound a bit like a bunch of grumpy old bats. But the grumpiness has nothing to do with these individual cases. It is the result of a long history of erosion experienced by us, the frequent flyer. We seem to have bumped into 1 or 2 issues where KLM seems to part us of money without any logic, product or extra service behind it. I have marked them with an (!) If somehow it can be proved they are not true, please let it it know ASAP, because I think these issues weigh even heavier than the ongoing erosion issues. Let’s sum up what eroded over the past years to show to anyone that we have the right to complain about any topic, even if it seems to be a small issue at first! So far we have: PRE APRIL FOOLS Eroded Cabin
Flying Blue
In flight
Ground
Reservation/booking
Operations
Other: Consensus (hard to prove but it is certainly how we see and feel it)
Other: Perhaps not necessarily eroded, but room for improvement
Other: Open for discussion (they may be personal taste or caused by external factors. Further, of course all points are open for discussion)
Improved
APRIL FOOLS Eroded
Improved
POST APRIL FOOLS Eroded Improved
Let’s stay reasonable and factual. Please try to keep personal issues, personal tastes, non-implemented products and rumours aside. Further, I would like to stress that 3 steps backwards and 1 step forward is still erosion! |
Originally Posted by Zembla
(Post 8657807)
My I have your points please?
|
Originally Posted by Zembla
(Post 8657807)
May I have your points please?
|
* reduction of the number of flight attendants on certain aircraft
* no more unlimited lounge access with Platinum/Royal Wing card * deteriorating in-flight kit * no more magazines in Y-class * introduction of a middle seat in J-class (on 777) * no more choice of starter in WBC * Priority luggage tags that almost never work |
* No 100% Level miles on certain booking classes (some of which are 200 euros more than other Sky Team partners)
* No way to avoid these booking classes when making a reservation on line without "upgrading" to Flex fares. * An internet booking fee * Outrageous fuel surcharges * Outrageous award booking taxes * A 0900 number to contact KLM when making a booking on line ( I should not have to pay to call them to give them my money) * A credit card surcharge, even when using their FB American Express card * No way to reserve seats on line * The introduction of the "paid" select seating * The introduction of the "paid" exit row and rows with only a 2 seat configuration * An almost non existent Elite boarding procedure |
Originally Posted by johan rebel
(Post 8659119)
[LIST][*]Seats in general (comfort decreases with each new generation).
|
Catering: European Y has changed stale cheese sandwiches for good sandwiches ^ on a fraction of flights at "Meal times :td::td: - which they make up, i'm sure, or maybe it's meal times in Oz or something) and all other flights you now eat dogfood dorito bits. Overall - :td:
|
I am taking the liberty to update my original post with your points, for general readabillity.
Apart from the section 'Eroded' I have included a section 'Other' and 'Improved'. |
Originally Posted by OttoMH
(Post 8663821)
Catering: European Y has changed stale cheese sandwiches for good sandwiches ^ on a fraction of flights at "Meal times :td::td: - which they make up, i'm sure, or maybe it's meal times in Oz or something) and all other flights you now eat dogfood dorito bits. Overall - :td:
|
Originally Posted by ranskis
(Post 8664019)
Actually, recently I flew NCE AMS in the morning on a fokker in ES. the Y sandwich was much much much better than the ES "thing". Fortunately, they had leftovers of Y sandwiches :)
|
erosion:
* free award tickets eliminated and replaced with copy of Dutch Air Miles "miles & money" scheme of bogus fees and taxes; existing miles became severely devalued overnight * miles continue to be made worth less due to continuing increases in redemption levels (e.g. Europe 123 - N. America C class, from 80K to 90K miles plus above mentioned extortionate fees) * quality of wines on board is much reduced and advertised wines are often not on board * finger pointing: 1.website help desk & 2.phone reservations & 3. FB FF program are all treated internally as if they are separate companies: the customer is stuck in the middle and treated poorly. (just try to buy a ticket on klm.com with a 100% earning fare class and a travel voucher - you will enter a twilight zone of dysfunctional company communication,personnel incompetence, unwillingness to serve, ...) * KLM staff have become quite blatant in their use and particularly abuse of company travel privileges to the point that paying customers risk losing their seats printed on their BP, choice of food or beverage, peaceful cabin, chance of fair or attentive service, chance of op-up, etc. improvement: * ability to book award travel more easily on AF where business class is still slightly above minimum industry thresholds of acceptability * darker shade of blue of KL livery introduced in the 90's looks somewhat nicer than the Korean Air style lighter shade of blue * FB program encourages frequent flyers to fly other airlines therefore weaning once loyal, exclusive KL travellers from KL and introducing them to new, more attractive options |
Originally Posted by Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM
(Post 8664092)
ability to book award travel more easily on AF where business class is still slightly above minimum industry thresholds of acceptability
And what is the definition of industry treshold of acceptabillity for business class award tickets? :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Zembla
(Post 8665378)
And what is the definition of industry treshold of acceptabillity for business class award tickets? :rolleyes:
Seriously, whether fully paid, discounted or paid for three times as an award (first extra for full miles, then using the miles then paying all the extra cash on top of the miles), the rapidly decreasing quality of the KL product is not really debated here, is it? I would love to hear factual arguments indicating that they are improving versus getting worse. I would love to have a reason to fly them again. If you look at the airlinequality website (and other rating organisations for that matter) you can also see that in the past year(s) KL has been demoted from being a 4 star "real" airline to a 3 star airline with quite some depressing company in the 3 star line up. |
Originally Posted by Klm is Dead - Long Live KLM
(Post 8665893)
look at the airlinequality website
Originally Posted by Zembla
(Post 8657807)
Improved
|
Originally Posted by Zembla
(Post 8657807)
Open for discussion [LIST][*]Reduced FB elite and CoS bonuses
Not sure how much room for discussion that leaves. Johan |
Hear hear!
Originally Posted by florin
(Post 8663811)
I actually find the seats in 738's and 739's to be the best Y seats in the industry. They're very comfortable, much better than any other Y seats I've encountered. E.g. the Y seats on AF's A320 family are awful and pale in comparison. (The very worst Y seats I've encountered are on RO.)
I agree and I argue this isn't a small achievement. The popular media mythology that all Y seats are the same is not believed or accepted by FT members but there does seem to be a pervasive suspicion that the differences in Y seat quality are small and that mean quality levels are very low. I say it's all too easy with relatively large budgets and strong internal corporate justification to provide comfortable J seating. If your company can't get that right, give it up! But Y is much, much harder to get right. There's less space, less money, and most importantly, less corporate will to improve the cabin. Some argue it's not even worth spending time or money on Y because it's too difficult to provide even a modicum of comfort. Well done KL on repudiating the myths and actually providing us with good seats in Y on a common ac type, something that seems beyond almost all other operators (CO? NW?) I haven't encountered Y on the AF A320 yet but it doesn't sound promising. I've only ever flown EP on AF (772), so that might account for my happy recollection of their comfort and service :p |
Originally Posted by johan rebel
(Post 8666533)
PE bonus reduced from 110 to 100%, longhaul CoS from 100 to 50%.
Not sure how much room for discussion that leaves. Johan e.g. on a 1000 mile biz segment: 1000 miles 1000 COS 2500 PE bonus --------- 4500 miles then vs. now 1000 miles 1000 PE bonus 500 COS -------- 2500 miles now |
Well for positive improvements I would list:
Much improved Schengen-area lounge at AMS - with better seating, better range of drinks, better range of snacks (which change throughout the day), much better acoustic isolation of the TV (something missing from so many other lounges, sadly), and better availability of electricity sockets for laptops, etc. I remain really impressed by this lounge. For negative things I would add: Website has deteriorated and is now even harder to make a booking, using either Safari or Firefox. Yes, hard to actually give them money! I usually resort to Expedia now. Techno |
Negative:
In many "off" markets such as Turkey, not only has KL been raising their unpublished Biz prices, often by twice as much as they were in recent years, but has also made these fares much more restrictive. To shoot themselves in the foot even more, many of these fares are more expensive than more direct (or direct) rouings with often better airlines. |
Personally, I believe the fact remains that KL/FB is one of the most inexpensive airlines in the Skyteam alliance (in Europe) that remains to make Elite Plus level. The airline is about to go down the drain but in the end, they are not bad if your travel is economy. In C, as full fare passenger, I am upset, but whenever I travel in economy they always live up to my expectations. They are not BA when it comes to SPA treatments etc... but then again, you would not make the same level with BA for the same amount of flights/price.
|
Originally Posted by dodgeflyer
(Post 8672735)
I am sorry - but are you blaming the crew for the snacks? As much as they upgrade friends and give out free goodie-bags I do not believe it is fair to say that they are to blame for the food.
Originally Posted by dodgeflyer
(Post 8672735)
Personally, I believe the fact remains that KL/FB is one of the most inexpensive airlines in the Skyteam alliance (in Europe) that remains to make Elite Plus level. The airline is about to go down the drain but in the end, they are not bad if your travel is economy. In C, as full fare passenger, I am upset, but whenever I travel in economy they always live up to my expectations. They are not BA when it comes to SPA treatments etc... but then again, you would not make the same level with BA for the same amount of flights/price.
Anyway...back to the facts now... |
The new (I'm not sure how new?) longhaul Y meals I was served on trips to DAR and NBO lately were bit on the small side. Soup on the left, salad on the right and a dessert cake in the middle, is this standard Y grub now? I'd have preferred the ol' pasta or chicken, which was more of a proper meal (in lack of a better word).
|
Originally Posted by view
(Post 8673825)
The new (I'm not sure how new?) longhaul Y meals I was served on trips to DAR and NBO lately were bit on the small side.
Johan |
I have spent considerable time cleaning up this thread tonight. I deleted several off-topic and trolling posts and removed quotes and references to them.
I commend Zembla for taking the initiative to create an objective and comprehensive list, and think it is a healthy exercise for forum members who may be questioning their loyalty to KLM as well as everyone at AMS should they care to absorb what's been contributed here. Please keep responses confined to the topic at hand. We are pretty casual about off-topic posts in this forum, but the kind of trolling and navel-gazing going on in this thread was ridiculous. |
Improved:
* Breakfast for Economy Class passengers on intercontinental flights * Amenity kit in WBC * General Inflight service * 738's and 739's Y seats * Award booking * IFE |
Originally Posted by likkie_lakkie
(Post 8677713)
Improved:
* Amenity kit in WBC * General Inflight service * Award booking The contents of the amenity kit have been downgraded over the years. General inflight service is a subjective view point but I haven't noticed anything to improve it. Food in economy? Award booking? How has this improved? * Awards Europe to North America have increased from 80,000 to 90,000. * I can no longer upgrade from economy to business on cheap fare. * As the highest tier on Flying Blue/Flying Dutchman I could get any spare seat providing there was one available. Not any more I don't believe. * Free tickets used to be FREE. You didn't even pay the taxes. Now the taxes run into hundreds of Euros! You even have to pay the fuel surcharge on KLM, which NOT a tax and therefore one shouldn't pay it. You have a very strange and blinkered view of KLM. |
Originally Posted by Mofomat
(Post 8678188)
Ha ha! LOL.
You have a very strange and blinkered view of KLM. I am surprised the word "enhanced" didn't show up or that no reference to a Peter Hartman interview was made. |
Originally Posted by likkie_lakkie
(Post 8677713)
Improved:
* Amenity kit in WBC I actually think they should do away with the kits entirely, for a premium cabin they are frankly insulting. Rather put a basket with some toiletry essentials in the lavatory, and distribute socks + slumber shades separately (as they used to do back in the metal box amenity kit days, remember?). Johan |
Originally Posted by Mofomat
(Post 8678188)
The contents of the amenity kit have been downgraded over the years.
Originally Posted by Mofomat
(Post 8678188)
* Free tickets used to be FREE. You didn't even pay the taxes. Now the taxes run into hundreds of Euros! You even have to pay the fuel surcharge on KLM, which NOT a tax and therefore one shouldn't pay it.
I really do think the FA's have become friendlier, but you are right, that is subjective and a personal experience. |
Originally Posted by likkie_lakkie
(Post 8678769)
Hmm, I read. that they have been upgraded very recently.
Unfortunately the bizarre high oil prices and Government taxes are to blame, not the airlines. Out of interest, are there airlines that still offer tickets that are 100% free? I don't know if there are still airlines that offer 100% free tickets, but the other day I reserved a "free ticket" YUL-CDG-MXP-CDG-YUL and the tax bill was 363$$$ (CAD wich is now the same as USA). 363 $ looks like a huge amount of taxes to me! I tried booking a paying fare the same trip (same days, same flights) and there were "only" 260 $ of taxes... Go figure... Ciao! |
Originally Posted by likkie_lakkie
(Post 8678769)
Hmm, I read. that they have been upgraded very recently.
Originally Posted by likkie_lakkie
(Post 8678769)
Unfortunately the bizarre high oil prices and Government taxes are to blame, not the airlines.
A few years ago KLM would give you a free ticket. They would even cover the cost of the airport taxes. Changing the policy on airport taxes is disappointing, but understandable. However, KLM also charge you the extortionate fuel surcharges which are NOT a tax. A tax is something which is collected on behalf of another party, such as airport passenger duty, or government taxes. U.S. airlines for example are not allowed to class fuel surcharges as a tax, and they have to be part of the airfare. Often a "free" ticket on KLM is more expensive than a revenue ticket on other airlines. |
Originally Posted by Mofomat
(Post 8679440)
However, KLM also charge you the extortionate fuel surcharges which are NOT a tax. A tax is something which is collected on behalf of another party, such as airport passenger duty, or government taxes.
U.S. airlines for example are not allowed to class fuel surcharges as a tax, and they have to be part of the airfare. Still, it is an erosion as such, compared to either the completely free award tickets (think I had one of those, which defines my age just a bit more...) or to just charging the airport and government taxes & fees. |
Originally Posted by frankvb
(Post 8679558)
But just for a point of balance, all airlines that have fuel surcharges for revenue tickets, also do this for award tickets (unless someone knows an exception?)
|
Originally Posted by frankvb
(Post 8679558)
when you cancel a non-flexible flight, those fuel surcharges suddenly seem to become part of the fare and are not refunded (don't know if this is KLM policy however).
Johan |
I am still with you and continue to upgrade this list.
We seem to have bumped into 1 or 2 issues where KLM seems to part us of money without any logic, product or extra service behind it. I have marked them with an (!) If somehow it can be proved they are not true, please let it it know ASAP, because I think these issues weigh even heavier than the ongoing erosion issues. |
Originally Posted by Mofomat
(Post 8679746)
I believe U.S. carriers for one do not charge fuel surcharges on revenue tickets. Would like someone to confirm this however.
|
I generally agree that food and drinks have improved at the lounge, but they're not exactly of outstanding quality. Besides, the chocomel never returned. I still miss the old individually packed bars of Gouda cheese, and I haven't seen popcorn in the lounge in a while either. Perhaps it's one of those rotating time-of-the-day snacks though.
I especially miss the old RoyalWing lounge in the D pier, which was ideal for the London flights. Nowadays of course I'm usually on VLM or BA, but still. Priority boarding has deteriorated. Although it never did work on short haul, in the olden days they'd at least make an effort on long haul. Remeber the colored cards and the lights? They still make the announcement that they'll start boarding with business class, but not even a token effort is made to enforce it. |
Originally Posted by WearyBizTrvlr
(Post 8680936)
I especially miss the old RoyalWing lounge in the D pier, which was ideal for the London flights. Nowadays of course I'm usually on VLM or BA, but still. |
Originally Posted by Mofomat
(Post 8679746)
I believe U.S. carriers for one do not charge fuel surcharges on revenue tickets. Would like someone to confirm this however.
What my point was that airlines either do not have fuel surcharges (either on revenue/award tickets), or they do have them, and will charge on both revenue and award tickets. |
Originally Posted by frankvb
(Post 8683695)
In most cases that is true.
What my point was that airlines either do not have fuel surcharges (either on revenue/award tickets), or they do have them, and will charge on both revenue and award tickets. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.