![]() |
Buying a Return, Only Using Outbound Leg
Deleted
|
Originally Posted by markle
(Post 15168577)
Does anyone have experience of buying a return KLM ticket, but only using the outbound leg?
I need to fly one-way EDI-AMS. A return ticket is about 35% the cost of a one-way ticket. Does anyone know if KLM tend to invoice travellers for the difference in price if the return segment is not used, or do they only do this for repeat offenders? The usual rules for risk minimization apply however:
In the past I've been able to successfully fly on the return leg of a ticket where I didn't use the outbound flight (on a KL operated by VG), so my impression is that they're not so efficient at picking these things up. |
Originally Posted by markle
(Post 15168577)
In the past I've been able to successfully fly on the return leg of a ticket where I didn't use the outbound flight (on a KL operated by VG), so my impression is that they're not so efficient at picking these things up. They are getting quite strict. If you are travelling from Antwerp to anywhere via Amsterdam and the first leg is by train, you still to pick your train ticket in Antwerp otherwise they will not let you on the plane in Amsterdam. |
So, it would be the same for Lyon-Paris by TGV with AF. Several times I hesitated buying my ticket from Lyon, since they are 50-100€ cheaper. Apparently, I did the right choice not to buy them.
|
Isn't this two entirely different things:
a) not taking the inbound flight b) not taking the first leg of the ticket? Not taking the first leg of the ticket does definitely not work. However, I discarded the return flights 3 times in the past 5 years (once even on advice of the KL ticket desk in AMS), always with my FB number in the booking, and I never had any problem. And yet, I would do it only in emergency situations, you never know if you might get into trouble (i.e. are charged for a one-way flight in the end). |
I find that the airlines really cannot impose charges against you (or your TA) if you don't make the return flight. Especially on non-changeable tickets. Because, well, STUFF happens and there are many reasons why you legitimately cannot make that flight and that you cannot change it.
I've had many situations when my plans change and I cannot change my ticket so have to forfeit the return leg. If I can change it even for a fee, I would rather. But then in most cases when change fees allow changes, they usually cost more than the ticket itself. So why bother? |
Although it's against the rules, airlines rarely enforce the rule and I know of quite some examples where my colleagues have also not used the return flights in order to cut costs for their departmental travel budget. :D
It does lead to no-shows for the airline if you do not cancel and that in turn makes airlines overbook their flights again. But I think these full fare return fare policies are really old fashioned pricing mechanisms. One should be able to book a oneway at a reasonable price and until this is in place, people will always try ways to circumvent the airlines policies. |
Deleted
|
Deleted
|
Originally Posted by markle
(Post 15198902)
Incredibly this was in Dec 2009.
I didn't expect it to work, but thought I'd try checking in online for the return flight... and it worked. I called CS to confirm if I would be allowed to fly - their answer? "No" "But why have I been issued a valid boarding pass then?" "I don't know Sir" I decided to try anyway... and I was able to board the flight with no difficulty at all. |
Deleted
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:20 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.