Is this itinerary too aggressive?
 

My friend made the following itinerary for India for me. I'm super open to quick travel (and I almost always travel with briefer visits to cities than just about everyone else recommends), but given the distances and flights and such, this seems like I may be spending more time traveling than visiting.

So is this itinerary at all feasible? Or is too aggressive? What particular parts will be toughest to do?

(Note: Have particular reasons for Hyderabad and Gulbarga, though Gulbarga could be replaced with another rural / off-the-beaten path location.)

Day 1- Delhi
Day 2- Agra
Day 3- Jaipur
Day 4- Hyderabad
Day 5- Hyderabad
Day 6- Gulbarga
Day 7- Mumbai
Day 8- Mumbai

Thanks.

it's doable but aggressive....you will definitely be spending more time traveling....

Way too aggressive. You will spend all your time traveling between these places and not see anything in any depth. I spent 2 full days in Agra it took a day to ge between Agra and Jaipur including a visit to fateipur sikri (sp?) and 3 full days in Jaipur. There is so much to see just between Delhi, Agea and Jaipur.

Definitely too aggressive. I think you are dramatically underestimating the time it takes just to get between city and airport in each place. This can take, literally, hours, depending on traffic/time of day. If you have 8 days I would limit it to 3 cities max. There is a lot to do in Delhi alone, for instance, well more than the half-day your itinerary appears to allow.