![]() |
Originally Posted by unicon
(Post 18453276)
Actually, that is not necessarily correct. It all depends on the contracts between them. For example, for quite a while DL had a separate partnership with SQ while both of them were ST and *A members respectively.
|
Sorry for the thread hijack with my questions on airlines and alliances, but thank you very much, PVDtoDEL and unicon. The confusion on the subject has been cleared, and I've learned in the process! :)
|
Jet originally had all alliances asking them to join. But Jet claimed they were akin to Emirates, and so much better than everyone else, they didn't need to stoop that low and join an alliance.
Then AI went Star and IT went oneworld. And suddenly, Jet got a case of the me-toos (that's been happening a lot lately, with every daily injection of reality into Goyal's ego-driven fantasy). Jet's "hold out for everything" game has backfired on them, and now its about "let's not end up with nothing".
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
(Post 18452598)
If IT or AI join an alliance, then suddenly 9W can't work with their alliance partners.
|
Originally Posted by jasepl
(Post 18469422)
What complete garbage. Remember this? There are other examples of this as well. |
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
(Post 18469492)
Not really - for example, when IT was about to join OW, AA was preparing to start routing their intra-India connections on IT instead of 9W. Then AA dropped DEL, so it didn't matter anyway.
There are other examples of this as well. I suppose this definitive conclusion was arrived at by extrapolating? |
Originally Posted by jasepl
(Post 18469504)
That is one example, specific to one situation; there are far more examples to the contrary.
I suppose this definitive conclusion was arrived at by extrapolating? |
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
(Post 18469507)
Care to provide some examples to the contrary if there are so many?
|
Originally Posted by jasepl
(Post 18469513)
Nah... It will be reality-based, so, obviously, worthless. Far better to get it all form a textbook.
Call something garbage, and then not be able to provide even one example to the contrary. |
C''mon folks... no need to go after each other.
|
Originally Posted by phillystudent
(Post 18483322)
C''mon folks... no need to go after each other.
|
Back to the topic on hand, I just was able to secure 2 J redemptions on 338 (the 7:15 AM departure) for Friday, November 30th. Try looking at 338 if that's an option - there seems to be some mixed J availability around the end of November, beginning of December.
|
Originally Posted by phillystudent
(Post 18485182)
Back to the topic on hand, I just was able to secure 2 J redemptions on 338 (the 7:15 AM departure) for Friday, November 30th. Try looking at 338 if that's an option - there seems to be some mixed J availability around the end of November, beginning of December.
|
Originally Posted by jasepl
(Post 18490172)
Was that using Skymiles (or through another FFP)? Or Jet points?
|
Originally Posted by phillystudent
(Post 18491121)
JP - I'm trying to liquidate and move out. But wouldn't the D class inventory availability be the same across the board regardless of FFP, or is my understanding incorrect?
Not surprising that DL has fired 9W and IT. 9W doesn't even mention on their website/ press that they are fired from DL! |
Originally Posted by charms81
(Post 18491367)
Nope, 9W is the worst airline for award redemption. Not only is it worse in terms of award ticket allotment, it also has one of the worst redemption system for partner airlines. So lets say if Delta wants to request a 9W segment, it has to prepare the complete itinerary (with confirmed availability of all other partner airlines segments) and then 'submit' the request to 9W system. 9W system comes back with 'waiting list' or 'confirmed' status in 1 min -2 hrs. This award availability is not in sync with what you see in JPMiles system. So there is no way for a partner to check D/X availability without submitting these blind requests.
Not surprising that DL has fired 9W and IT. 9W doesn't even mention on their website/ press that they are fired from DL! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.