![]() |
Originally Posted by Here2There
(Post 16211954)
+1
I have not flown on Jet but if they end up finally joining an alliance, even the so called leftover one, I will fly them the first chance I get even if they dont join my preferred alliance. LH and ULH flights, don't benefit from hub and spoke system. In fact hub and spoke system would degrade revenue as well as aircraft utilisation. |
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16210896)
DO you think PIT-EWR-BRU-BOM/DEL-AMD model will attract more passengers thanr PIT-DEL/BOM-AMD or PIT-AMD?
|
Originally Posted by avm2806
(Post 16212666)
do you actually believe there is room for a PIT-AMD or a PIT-BOM flight? SERIOUSLY???
It's not the city pair that's significant, it's the mode. I never said there is room for PIT-AMD or even PIT-BOM. You can pick any city within the range of a nonstop. The issue isn;t which cities are suitable for ULH, but whethther hub and spoke is better than nonstop. Do you understand? |
I understand just fine, and like many others on here am not the biggest fan of your condscending attitude... the debate is been on going between hub and spoke and ULH... Airbus went for the hub and spoke with 380, Boeing the other way the ULR's and the 787's and honestly the debate still hasn't been answered...
So far most ULH flights have proven to be unsuccesful. AI's arent profitable, SQ had to change the config on their transpacs and so on. AA's DEL-ORD might be considered succesful seasonally - but they have just chosen to drop one flight a week for the summer... Delta couldn't survive on BOM-JFK and after the NW merger went with flying via AMS... So given the success rate thus far... what make you think 9W would succeed... The only true success on ULR flights has been EK and they work a hub and spoke system with ULR's as a part of them rather than isolated ULR sectors... |
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16210896)
A hub in Europe is not all that useful as you think. It cannot pickup passengers (O&D) between Brussels or any other European city and the U.S just because it has a hub.
Having people connect in DEL, now that Delhi has T3 or in any other Indian airport capable of handling transfers, with a nonstop to the final destination is better than stopping in Brussels. Even if we don't Very few overseas hubs are successful, even. What an airline needs is some non-stops between a decent Indian airport and carefully chosen north American destinations. DO you think PIT-EWR-BRU-BOM/DEL-AMD model will attract more passengers thanr PIT-DEL/BOM-AMD or PIT-AMD? If you want a hub in DEL, that wouldn't make much sense either because ULH flights are expensive to run (carrying all that fuel is expensive). PIT-DEL-MAA would be much more expensive than PIT-BRU-MAA. |
finally....i've been waiting for jet to introduce non-stop flights between delhi & ny for as long as i can remember....
|
Originally Posted by srirams
(Post 16218254)
Why not? 9w sells tickets between NA and Brussels, and considering the competition, they are one of the better choices.
Originally Posted by srirams
(Post 16218254)
So you want PIT-DEL, PIT-BOM, PIT-AMD, PIT-MAA, PIT-BLR, etc? I don't see that happening.
If you want a hub in DEL, that wouldn't make much sense either because ULH flights are expensive to run (carrying all that fuel is expensive). PIT-DEL-MAA would be much more expensive than PIT-BRU-MAA. Did you not read that I just picked a city to illustrate the contrast between a UScity-EWR-BRU-BOM/Delhi-IndianCity and UScity-DEL/BOM-IndianCity. You guys get hung up in the city names instead of following the argument. This, even after I stated that the city pair isn;t the issue, but that the issue is ULH vs hub and spoke with a hub in a foreign city. |
Originally Posted by avm2806
(Post 16216281)
I understand just fine, and like many others on here am not the biggest fan of your condscending attitude... the debate is been on going between hub and spoke and ULH... Airbus went for the hub and spoke with 380, Boeing the other way the ULR's and the 787's and honestly the debate still hasn't been answered...
So far most ULH flights have proven to be unsuccesful. AI's arent profitable, SQ had to change the config on their transpacs and so on. AA's DEL-ORD might be considered succesful seasonally - but they have just chosen to drop one flight a week for the summer... Delta couldn't survive on BOM-JFK and after the NW merger went with flying via AMS... So given the success rate thus far... what make you think 9W would succeed... The only true success on ULR flights has been EK and they work a hub and spoke system with ULR's as a part of them rather than isolated ULR sectors... Yes, ULH with a hub is what's needed, with a hub in India, not in Europe. An Indian airline must be able to connect major Indian cities with major destinations nonstop. Otherwise they will continue to lose to the likes of EK and SQ. |
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16210896)
A hub in Europe is not all that useful as you think. It cannot pickup passengers (O&D) between Brussels or any other European city and the U.S just because it has a hub.
Do you think 9W can simply add North/South American or other destinations without feeding traffic into Brussels? ...
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16218927)
Does 9W have 5th freedom rights? As far as I know it does not. 9W can fly pax between a European city and an Indian city via BRU, as well as between a U.S. city and an Indian city via BRU. But NOT between BRU or any other european city and North America, without fflying them through. Get your facts right please.
|
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16218927)
Does 9W have 5th freedom rights? As far as I know it does not. 9W can fly pax between a European city and an Indian city via BRU, as well as between a U.S. city and an Indian city via BRU. But NOT between BRU or any other european city and North America, without fflying them through. Get your facts right please.
Also, given you seem to be quite knowledgeable about 5th freedom rights etc., appreciate if you could clarify whether those rights are for airlines of a whole country, or whether they are by specific airlines? Your question about "9W" having 5th freedom rights makes me think your position is that they are by airline (??). However, Wikipedia seems to not have its facts straight, and defines them as "granting a right to a country's airline(s)". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedoms_of_the_air |
There are not enough passengers than want to fly between a single US city and a single India city who are also willing to pay extra for a non-stop to profitably fly very many ultra-longhauls. It costs much more (because of fuel) to fly ORD-HYD non-stop rather than ORD-BRU-HYD.
3 steps to tranform 9W from the fringe stuggling airline they are now to a profitable world class leader: In less than 2 years time, complete: 1) Join Star Alliance 2) Codeshare 100% of SN's flight network. http://i.imgur.com/TsYCj.png 3) Fly their own planes (and ask to SN codeshare) the top 20 US airports to/from the top 10 India airports. ATL/ORD/LAX/DFW/DEN/JFK/EWR/IAH/LAS/SFO/PHX/CLT/MIA/MCO/MSP/SEA/DTW/PHL/BOS/IAD Map <--> BRU <---> BOM/DEL/MAA/CCU/BLR/HYD/GAU/AMD/PNQ/COK http://i.imgur.com/ozT5S.png If Star Alliance will not agree to #1; go ahead with steps #2 and #3 anyway - plan should still work. The above plan provides one-stop service between 200 city pairs on 9W metal and more than 1000 city pairs when you combine the SN and proposed 9W networks. Do the math. |
Originally Posted by wanaflyforless
(Post 16219376)
In less than 2 years time, complete:
1) Join Star Alliance |
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16218927)
Does 9W have 5th freedom rights? As far as I know it does not. 9W can fly pax between a European city and an Indian city via BRU, as well as between a U.S. city and an Indian city via BRU. But NOT between BRU or any other european city and North America, without fflying them through. Get your facts right please.
Geez. Another one of those. :rolleyes: I did not say I want PIT-DEL, nor PIT-BOM nor PIT-AMD. Did you not read that I just picked a city to illustrate the contrast between a UScity-EWR-BRU-BOM/Delhi-IndianCity and UScity-DEL/BOM-IndianCity. You guys get hung up in the city names instead of following the argument. This, even after I stated that the city pair isn;t the issue, but that the issue is ULH vs hub and spoke with a hub in a foreign city. |
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16219011)
Yes, ULH with a hub is what's needed, with a hub in India, not in Europe. An Indian airline must be able to connect major Indian cities with major destinations nonstop. Otherwise they will continue to lose to the likes of EK and SQ.
|
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16218927)
Does 9W have 5th freedom rights? As far as I know it does not. 9W can fly pax between a European city and an Indian city via BRU, as well as between a U.S. city and an Indian city via BRU. But NOT between BRU or any other european city and North America, without fflying them through. Get your facts right please.
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 16218927)
Geez. Another one of those. :rolleyes: I did not say I want PIT-DEL, nor PIT-BOM nor PIT-AMD.
Did you not read that I just picked a city to illustrate the contrast between a UScity-EWR-BRU-BOM/Delhi-IndianCity and UScity-DEL/BOM-IndianCity. You guys get hung up in the city names instead of following the argument. This, even after I stated that the city pair isn;t the issue, but that the issue is ULH vs hub and spoke with a hub in a foreign city. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:06 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.