![]() |
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
(Post 25313797)
Even in F - that's 5 F round trips Europe-Asia a year...! Obviously for Flyertalk that's nothing, but for most people, especially if they don't travel for work, that's quite a lot of time to have to spend flying (if not $$$).
|
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
(Post 25313797)
Even in F - that's 5 F round trips Europe-Asia a year...! Obviously for Flyertalk that's nothing, but for most people, especially if they don't travel for work, that's quite a lot of time to have to spend flying (if not $$$).
|
Originally Posted by m3red
(Post 25313882)
its both $$$$$$ and time flying!
|
I have always felt that where our personal travel expenditure is concerned (ie not just leisure travel, but maybe business travel too if the business happens to be your own, and so it's yourself who effectively picks up the tab) it all comes down to perspective and the balancing of priorities. I guess at one point or another, those priorities have to be considered by all except the mega-wealthy who are fortunate enough to have unlimited funds with no compromise necessary.
I myself am happy to (or perhaps that should read prepared to ) spend money on premium cabins for anything other than short-haul. But even some of my close relatives see it as a waste of hard cash .....extravagant even in some cases. And I have a good friend dating back to my Uni days who has since amassed FAR greater resources than I have (or ever will), and for whom F class travel would be a very minor spend in the context of his total assets and lifestyle overall. However .....he only ever flies coach - as our US friends would say ! And, although he & I have never discussed our differing views on cabin classes in any real depth, I DO know that he considers his investment in land and bricks & mortar to be far more 'useful' for the long term than the highly perishable product and transient enjoyment of an airline seat which you only occupy fleetingly for a matter of hours. Deep down.....I sense he's right and I'm wrong. But I also know that we don't always make our individual choices for wholly rational reasons. |
I dunno subject2load, I think deep down you're probably right and he's wrong. What the point of having all that money or assets if you don't benefit from them? My father in law is like this, pots of cash and assets but never spends any money, never goes anywhere and if he did I guarantee it would be coach. Now don't get me wrong, his money, his life, his choice, but ifI've got the funds and can buy myself some comfort, I'm gonna buy that comfort.
Of course this explains why I spend more than I earn and I'm always short of cash...... |
Interesting comments there paule23, and I fully understand the general point you make.
Just to clarify my own post a little .....the friend I mentioned DOES spend money, he is definitely no miser - in fact he spends big time. Far more than I ever will be able to. He is very generous and hospitable. It's just that he doesn't see the point of buying a larger seat which takes you to exactly the same place as the cheaper ones. And in all honesty, I do come across many people who could very comfortably afford the front of the plane, but who - for whatever reason - just don't consider it important within the context of all their other expenditure. I often wonder what a psychologist would make of it all ....... |
Originally Posted by subject2load
(Post 25315936)
Interesting comments there paule23, and I fully understand the general point you make.
Just to clarify my own post a little .....the friend I mentioned DOES spend money, he is definitely no miser - in fact he spends big time. Far more than I ever will be able to. He is very generous and hospitable. It's just that he doesn't see the point of buying a larger seat which takes you to exactly the same place as the cheaper ones. And in all honesty, I do come across many people who could very comfortably afford the front of the plane, but who - for whatever reason - just don't consider it important within the context of all their other expenditure. I often wonder what a psychologist would make of it all ....... From the point of view of the hospitality industry, there's no right or wrong answer - travel (and entertainment) is the ultimate discretionary spend and you start off from that basis when figuring out what people will pay for, and what they absolutely won't pay for. Cultural background and especially people's wealth journey (a euphemism for, how quickly did they become rich, and start off from the base line that people who are newly rich like to spend it) lets you tailor your product to the markets you serve. But never make the mistake that everyone in the same market thinks the same - I know lots of old money Europeans who love the EK bling :D Then again, I don't actually think the EK cabin is that bling - faux gold and wood doesn't count when you see some of the really "bling" stuff out there when you work in hospitality, so perhaps I have a different yardstick! I also know people such as this - comfortable 9 figure net worth, always flies Y from Asia to the US. Always. He justifies this by saying the people in Y are more interesting ;) The rest of his family like to fly J as F is "too extravagant". And then on the other hand, there are those people who always save up for J or F on their once a year trip. Neither is wrong and neither is anything in between, when it comes to air travel, simply one's views on what is important. One person's "wastefulness" is another's "luxury". |
Originally Posted by subject2load
(Post 25314747)
I have always felt that where our personal travel expenditure is concerned (ie not just leisure travel, but maybe business travel too if the business happens to be your own, and so it's yourself who effectively picks up the tab) it all comes down to perspective and the balancing of priorities. I guess at one point or another, those priorities have to be considered by all except the mega-wealthy who are fortunate enough to have unlimited funds with no compromise necessary.
I myself am happy to (or perhaps that should read prepared to ) spend money on premium cabins for anything other than short-haul. But even some of my close relatives see it as a waste of hard cash .....extravagant even in some cases. And I have a good friend dating back to my Uni days who has since amassed FAR greater resources than I have (or ever will), and for whom F class travel would be a very minor spend in the context of his total assets and lifestyle overall. However .....he only ever flies coach - as our US friends would say ! And, although he & I have never discussed our differing views on cabin classes in any real depth, I DO know that he considers his investment in land and bricks & mortar to be far more 'useful' for the long term than the highly perishable product and transient enjoyment of an airline seat which you only occupy fleetingly for a matter of hours. Deep down.....I sense he's right and I'm wrong. But I also know that we don't always make our individual choices for wholly rational reasons. |
Originally Posted by subject2load
(Post 25304576)
Plus, worth remembering that acquiring status is one thing ; maintaining it can be costly. |
Originally Posted by subject2load
(Post 25314747)
Deep down.....I sense he's right and I'm wrong.
A lot of folks perceive that flying F means 'having arrived' / being extremely rich. So long as you can keep them separate, one should be fine. |
Originally Posted by jackiedada
(Post 25317110)
I would tend to agree with your friends philosophy. Once you've done it a couple of times, you definitely wonder if it makes sense to pay so much for such a transient and fleeting experience, especially since its no different from your earlier one.
A lot of folks perceive that flying F means 'having arrived' / being extremely rich. So long as you can keep them separate, one should be fine. I'm in the camp of I'd rather not fly that fly Y for more than 4 hours. |
Originally Posted by m3red
(Post 25313853)
I might list out my flights for what I needed to get plat - its quite obscene!
|
Originally Posted by jbflyboy84
(Post 25317576)
I'm not sure if others feel the same, but I would quite intrigued to know the EK flying that you do in order to gain/maintain Plat. I achieved Gold last year and have just renewed again and all that flying was in Y on average at least once per month on varying stage lengths.
|
Originally Posted by jbflyboy84
(Post 25317576)
I'm not sure if others feel the same, but I would quite intrigued to know the EK flying that you do in order to gain/maintain Plat. I achieved Gold last year and have just renewed again and all that flying was in Y on average at least once per month on varying stage lengths.
On the other hand, perhaps a list might be too much information for some. I suspect most of us already have a more-than-adequate picture based on previous posts ...... |
Originally Posted by m3red
(Post 25317474)
Its not making me wealthier thats for sure but I enjoy it as does my wife - you only live once.
I'm in the camp of I'd rather not fly that fly Y for more than 4 hours. Before buying our first J ticket, I spent much time in convincing my wife than convincing myself whether I can afford it :D. And not anymore..!!! These days we set aside the vacation money first, and work out which amongst the three needs priority, i.e flights, hotels, shopping etc. So going into Dubai means, lot of shopping so will compromise on flights. Its 6.5 hrs in Y in A380. Really not very difficult. When travelling to South Asia, flights gets priority. You end up paying the same money as you will pay for Dubai. Plus, you get a chance to enjoy the lounges in transit. In any case, nothing is right or wrong here, money is a relative thing. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.