![]() |
I don't like the new reservation system, nor the new time table: it is not accurate: for example, if you have a flight operated by a 767, you can't know whether it is a 767-200 or -300: they are listed as "767-200/300"; and of course, it is not possible anymore to know whether it is a 767-200 or -200ER!
Then, LY only owns 757-200s, and yet, flights operated by 757-200s are listed as "757-200/300" :confused: The flight schedule timetable is not good; I prefered the older one very disappointing:mad: |
Originally Posted by mikebg
(Post 9525934)
However bad they may seem, I don't think they will ever get as bad as BA got with the shambles of the T5 Heathrow opening ;)
Are you comparing the first few days of one of the largest and most sophisticated airport terminals for one of the biggest airlines in the world to a long over due internet booking system for a small airline !?!?!?!?! |
Wow - the new "online schedule" function is really BAD. The old one was much better, in comparison. There is no way to tell what a/c type is really going to be used. They don't show you per day, but rather per week. Its not possible that they use the same a/c type each day - never works that way with LY.
I just can't beleive that they put the new interface up without testing it first. This baby is sooooo not ready for prime-time. |
Originally Posted by LatusElAl
(Post 9526088)
Wow - the new "online schedule" function is really BAD. The old one was much better, in comparison. There is no way to tell what a/c type is really going to be used. They don't show you per day, but rather per week. Its not possible that they use the same a/c type each day - never works that way with LY.
I just can't beleive that they put the new interface up without testing it first. This baby is sooooo not ready for prime-time. |
Originally Posted by clubman
(Post 9525823)
And what makes you so sure of that...? :D
I am not sure they will solve it soon. There are too many basic mistakes in the system. I am trying to book a flight to AMS and back from SXF,,, doesn't work. Maybe after the Hagim. @:-) |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9526077)
lets keep thing in porportions
Are you comparing the first few days of one of the largest and most sophisticated airport terminals for one of the biggest airlines in the world to a long over due internet booking system for a small airline !?!?!?!?! |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9526077)
lets keep thing in porportions
Are you comparing the first few days of one of the largest and most sophisticated airport terminals for one of the biggest airlines in the world to a long over due internet booking system for a small airline !?!?!?!?!
Originally Posted by mikebg
(Post 9526495)
Well, considering that the UK government is trying to fix things up as best as they can, and there is talk of the entire top tier of BA management resigning, I would say that it is quite a monumental disaster. 450 cancelled flights in the first week, and at least 25,000 suitcases stuck is no small matter. The place was supposedly being dry-run for 3 months before it opened. It is, without doubt, one of the biggest British building fiascos ever (read the BBC and the UK newspapers and you will get a better picture).
Mike, I don't think ly787 doubted what you are saying regarding the T5 shambles. I agree that the whole T5 disaster was a total disgrace (still is in fact) you cannot compare the two. |
Originally Posted by LY777
(Post 9526071)
if you have a flight operated by a 767, you can't know whether it is a 767-200 or -300: they are listed as "767-200/300"; and of course, it is not possible anymore to know whether it is a 767-200 or -200ER!
The seating configurations are different; and the 763 is a much nicer newer aircraft. This new system sounds awful. Since we now have 2 LY insiders here, perhaps one of them would like to take this to their attention and get something done about it? |
actually there is a difference between the 767 and 767ER In the 767 the pitch in business is 55 and in the 767ER the pitch is 60.
|
Originally Posted by mikebg
(Post 9526495)
Well, considering that the UK government is trying to fix things up as best as they can, and there is talk of the entire top tier of BA management resigning, I would say that it is quite a monumental disaster. 450 cancelled flights in the first week, and at least 25,000 suitcases stuck is no small matter. The place was supposedly being dry-run for 3 months before it opened. It is, without doubt, one of the biggest British building fiascos ever (read the BBC and the UK newspapers and you will get a better picture).
Originally Posted by clubman
(Post 9526575)
I agree with ly787.
Mike, I don't think ly787 doubted what you are saying regarding the T5 shambles. I agree that the whole T5 disaster was a total disgrace (still is in fact) you cannot compare the two. With LY there is ALWAYS a feeling of "something is missing" or "not perfect", since the Borovitch are around. 1. Not exactly First Class. Its actually a Flat Business Class seat with business class "tray" food service. 2. The buisness class - better than they had but still not great. 3. The new AVOD only in TWO a/c. 4. The mood lighting never used properly. 5. New seats only in C and F - not in Y. etc etc etc Ah - and the "NEW" EWR lounge - outside the terminal in the Marriott. |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9526899)
When will LY's top tier start paying for their mistakes?
With LY there is ALWAYS a feeling of "something is missing" or "not perfect", since the Borovitch are around. I think that the root problem with the First Class product (and I have told EL AL's management this directly on more than one occasion) is rather like those Israelis who, in the 1980's would say that the economic solutions which cures the British and European economies would not work in Israel, because the Israeli economy 'was different' and the rules which worked in the rest of the world wouldn't work here. Of course, as we now know, they were quite wrong. I think that somehow, EL AL's management feel that 'EL AL is different', and what works for other airlines First Class product doesn't apply to them. Now, they may be correct with respect to some things, but I am not at all convinced. They make a big noise about the price of A class to NYC being reduced as a result of making it more cramped, but all that happened was that BA reduced their prices as well ... for a 'real' F product! Having been in the new 772 F cabin last week for the first time, all I can say is that the whole thing probably boils down to 60 cm. I reckon that by adding 30cm to each row in F they would have a F product where the window seat passenger doesn't need to climb over and disturb the aisle passenger (because of this I always book seats D or G in the new F on the 772). That boils down to one row of economy seats ... what can I say? |
Originally Posted by mikebg
(Post 9527047)
I don't think that Borovitch has anything to do with the current malaise. They are in it for the money. If the management makes more money they will stay. If not, they will go.
I think that the root problem with the First Class product (and I have told EL AL's management this directly on more than one occasion) is rather like those Israelis who, in the 1980's would say that the economic solutions which cures the British and European economies would not work in Israel, because the Israeli economy 'was different' and the rules which worked in the rest of the world wouldn't work here. Of course, as we now know, they were quite wrong. I think that somehow, EL AL's management feel that 'EL AL is different', and what works for other airlines First Class product doesn't apply to them. Now, they may be correct with respect to some things, but I am not at all convinced. They make a big noise about the price of A class to NYC being reduced as a result of making it more cramped, but all that happened was that BA reduced their prices as well ... for a 'real' F product! Having been in the new 772 F cabin last week for the first time, all I can say is that the whole thing probably boils down to 60 cm. I reckon that by adding 30cm to each row in F they would have a F product where the window seat passenger doesn't need to climb over and disturb the aisle passenger (because of this I always book seats D or G in the new F on the 772). That boils down to one row of economy seats ... what can I say? 2.I dont know what they are taking about "lowering" the First Class fares. I have noticed that they are back up to what they were and even this morning I posted that I saw on the new website First class fare in May to NY was almost $10,000!!! $12,000 to LAX!! 3.Pitch in First is about 72". In Business its 60". I recently flew on the new a/c in First back from HKG. Luckily we were only 4 pax, i didnt even want to think about how it would have been with 12 pax! The food was good, but i think its unexceptable to serve the food on trays. I dont care that thats the only way they can serve the window pax - then they should either call the service BUSINESS class or increase the pitch! 4. I hope everyone know and realizes that the seat in First is almost the same exact seat as in the Business Class. The difference lies in the pitch and a little bit in the width. The LY First Class seat is usually used by airlines that have 6 across in Business (mostly in A340's) What really annoyed me was that EL AL makes the "BIG NOISE" on how these new 772 have the latest and most sophistacted technology and produst when actually its not so. The AVOD is new - ok. The mood lighting is relatively new - but hardly anyone in LY knows how to properly use it. BUT the seats!! - Those seats have been around for a few years: 1. South African's Business class in the A340 is the same seats as LY has now in First. It was introduced over 3 years ago. http://www.flatseats.com/Gallery/SA-J-1.htm 2. Finnair's Business is same as new LY Business but was introduced over 2 years ago http://www.flatseats.com/Product/new...air-050106.htm 3. Austian's business is same as new LY buisness Also from over a year ago http://www.flatseats.com/Gallery/OS-5.htm 4. Iberia's Business is the LY First Class seat but with a little less pitch than LY's first. 5. The only airline that uses the same LY First seats in First is AIR MAURITIUS, but they have 80". And it was introduced over a year ago as well. http://www.flatseats.com/Product/news-mau01Jan.htm I would hardly call these seats the latest and best! |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9527936)
3.Pitch in First is about 72". In Business its 60". I recently flew on the new a/c in First back from HKG. Luckily we were only 4 pax, i didnt even want to think about how it would have been with 12 pax! The food was good, but i think its unexceptable to serve the food on trays. I dont care that thats the only way they can serve the window pax - then they should either call the service BUSINESS class or increase the pitch!
|
so now the booking works
but still not possible to book returning from a different destination. |
Originally Posted by apirchik
(Post 9493290)
Is Amadeus the global one or a new El Al system with a very unique name?
Touch wood seems like its going fine. Best of luck to LY and everyone in TLV for the cutover. |
Three days later and still not possible to make a booking on the new system - returning from a different destination.
Disgrace |
Disgrace |
the good side and some bad
Good :There are no time limits now for ticketing...
Bad : There are places on I class to NY and as a PL I can get this place on D, The system doesn't know this rule... (not yet) LiorM |
Originally Posted by LiorM
(Post 9538172)
The system doesn't know
this rule... (not yet) |
Apart from the already mentioned hopeless online schedule, which cannot even tell you what aircraft will fly on any particular day (and the information IS available elsewhere) the schedule itself will not work on Firefox at all. I have never encountered ANY other airline website anywhere which will only work on Internet Explorer. Just which idiots are 'developing' the software for EL AL?
|
Originally Posted by JGPH1
(Post 9537514)
Touch wood seems like its going fine. Best of luck to LY and everyone in TLV for the cutover.
Have you read peoples posts here about it? (in the other thread...) Oh, and welcome to FT JGPH1! :) |
so when do the heads start rolling?
Haim Romano - should be the first to leave bring back Amos Shapira! |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9542062)
so when do the heads start rolling?
Haim Romano - should be the first to leave bring back Amos Shapira! I guess that by "cutting edge" they meant cutting the edge of the information given on the website (like the flight schedules) :D |
I must be missing something. I am trying to look in the Seats & Meals system. I have a PNR that starts with Z, not L or M. I don't see how I bypass the (let us convert your L or M PNR to a new one) system to be able to input my Z PNR.
|
Originally Posted by yosithezet
(Post 9544021)
I must be missing something. I am trying to look in the Seats & Meals system. I have a PNR that starts with Z, not L or M. I don't see how I bypass the (let us convert your L or M PNR to a new one) system to be able to input my Z PNR.
BTW - still no fixed the problems with the website |
Web-site
Originally Posted by mikebg
(Post 9539060)
Apart from the already mentioned hopeless online schedule, which cannot even tell you what aircraft will fly on any particular day (and the information IS available elsewhere) the schedule itself will not work on Firefox at all. I have never encountered ANY other airline website anywhere which will only work on Internet Explorer. Just which idiots are 'developing' the software for EL AL?
Dear Sir EL-AL's web-site homepage, as well as various applications such as the online reservation and check-in are applicable with Firefox. We are currently in an ongoing procedure of matching the web site with all of the popular browsers. The online schedule which has been launched as part of the new reservation system - Amadeus is a top tear system that provides a wide variety of useful information such as airplane models, terminals and more. You should be able to use the system also with the Firefox browser. In any case we will investigate your complaint with the supplier and we will make sure this application supports all of the popular browsers as promised. EL AL Rep. |
Originally Posted by clubman
(Post 9541645)
Going fine? It’s a load of c***! :td:
Have you read peoples posts here about it? (in the other thread...) Oh, and welcome to FT JGPH1! :) |
Originally Posted by EL AL Rep.
(Post 9548348)
EL-AL's web-site homepage, as well as various applications such as the online reservation and check-in are applicable with Firefox. We are currently in an ongoing procedure of matching the web site with all of the popular browsers.
The online schedule which has been launched as part of the new reservation system - Amadeus is a top tear system that provides a wide variety of useful information such as airplane models, terminals and more. You should be able to use the system also with the Firefox browser. I'm sorry to say that your website has some serious issues with compatibility to browsers that are not made by Microsoft and are not called Internet Explorer. I'm also sorry to say that while Amadeus should be better with compatibility to other browsers, it is only a component in your system and to get to those components you still have to browse via the main web pages of elal.com which (as mentioned) have compatibility issues. Amadeus indeed provides information such as airplane models but Carmel gave a specific model while Amadeus gives "Boeing 767-200/200ER" or "Equipment varies" - needless to say, this is a serious downgrade to the services given to the passenger by your website. apirchik. |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9548073)
Maybe thats the new PNR, no need to convert.
Originally Posted by EL AL Rep.
(Post 9548348)
EL-AL's web-site homepage, as well as various applications such as the online reservation and check-in are applicable with Firefox.
1) Go to http://www.elal.co.il/ELAL/English/States/General/ 2) Input your LY Matmid number and password and submit 3) Click on My Account 4) Click on Account Balance 5) Click on Display Reports Do you consider the result to be a web site that works in Firefox?! I complained about it in September of 2006. It took El Al 2 months to respond to my complaint. 2 months! 2 months!!! Good thing I'm Gold. Imagine if I had no status. The guy I spoke with understood that the problem may be from a problem with the CSS style sheet. It was fixed within a month or so. Worked fine for a short period. Then reverted back to the same crap you see now. Does El Al take no pride in QAing your website and making sure it works? Also, why is it taking almost a week for points to post now? I flew on Saturday night and it is now Thursday. Before it would take only 2 days or so. |
Originally Posted by jonnye
(Post 9548367)
Clubman do you know what's the story with us seeing seatmaps now in EF or PNR's in CheckMyTrip.com?
Just about halfway through the PNR. Sayonara! |
Originally Posted by apirchik
(Post 9542423)
As far as LY is concerned, they have rolled out their new "Cutting edge", "state-of-the-art" reservations system with great success!
I guess that by "cutting edge" they meant cutting the edge of the information given on the website (like the flight schedules) :D |
Originally Posted by clubman
(Post 9541645)
Going fine? It’s a load of c***! :td:
Have you read peoples posts here about it? (in the other thread...) Oh, and welcome to FT JGPH1! :) |
Originally Posted by JGPH1
(Post 9552019)
All I've seen in the threads are some issues with the website. News from TLV seems to indicate that the cutover went very smoothly. People .....ing about seeing "Boeing 767-200/300" is hardly what one might call a show-stopper. :)
So you work for Amadeus? |
Originally Posted by JGPH1
(Post 9551931)
It all comes down to the old adage - "Garbage in, garbage out". Amadeus (and the LY website) display only the information provided. If LY publish "767" as the aircraft type in the schedule, the correct IATA equipment code translation for "767" is "Boeing 767-200/300", and that is what Amadeus (and therefore the website) will display. If LY publish "762" or "763", the correct IATA codes for the 767-200 and 767-300 respectively, then "Boeing 767-200" and/or "Boeing 767-300" will be displayed. It's not the system's fault.
|
Originally Posted by yosithezet
(Post 9552390)
You are telling us that we should be happy with the degradation in service?
|
Originally Posted by yosithezet
(Post 9552369)
How about check-in agents ... how did you say... ".....ing" about how the system just doesn't move when they are trying to check in you in TLV? Does that count as 'smooth'?
So you work for Amadeus? |
Originally Posted by JGPH1
(Post 9552019)
All I've seen in the threads are some issues with the website. News from TLV seems to indicate that the cutover went very smoothly. People .....ing about seeing "Boeing 767-200/300" is hardly what one might call a show-stopper. :)
but this discusiion should be continued in the other thread: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=797678 |
double post
|
1. JGPH1 - so its obvious you work in AMADUES now :)
It vey important the different a/c type: - Entertainment System - some have and some dont have, some have AVOD, some dont - Seat pitch - Different on different a/c type - some have average of 32" and some average at 34" - Try flying on a non ER 767 and an LY 763ER and you will understand many other differences. So finally its possible to returning from a different destination but only in ENGLISH !!!! The system doenst recognize returning from a different destination in hebrew !!!!!!! And thats 5 days after the system has been introduced. I noticed they alao added a "modify reservation" option !!!! maybe someone is reading this forum and taking notes. |
Originally Posted by ly787
(Post 9554205)
I noticed they alao added a "modify reservation" option !!!! maybe someone is reading this forum and taking notes.
1) The tab in to "Reservations" doesn't work in Firefox. If you move to Hebrew the tab to "עדכון הזמנות" does work in Firefox. 2) The page with the verification code has a screwed up html table and I have to scroll right to see the code and the box to put in the code. 3) I went to View Your Reservation in Firefox and put in my PNR and name. The "Continue" button doesn't work. 4) If you put in a wrong PNR you get to a page where you can put it in again but that also suggest to use a box below to sign into your account and see a list of upcoming trips. The button to submit this information... yep.. doesn't work. 5) Go back to the previous page to enter in the PNR correctly, the page keeps populating the mistaken PNR. Now, when in IE you finally get to the page listing the flights on the PNR, it actually looks good. I assume this is standard Amadeus HTML with LY having nothing but styling to do. 6) Clicking to Modify Passenger Details gives me not my LY Matmid number populated, but another one which is one one of the other PNR legs. 7) None of the personal details they have for me are in the details of the PNR. I have always said that we Israelis are great at developing technology but horrible at actually using it. The folks working on the website must be related to someone because they sure have no idea what they are doing when it comes to delivering a working web application. JGPH1 perhaps you folks at Amadeus can suggest to LY that you will help them on this one as it obviously makes the switchover look bad. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:03 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.