![]() |
Chicken sashimi
First time I had chicken sashimi.
Raw chicken - totally counter intuitive. Raw chicken hearts, gizzards, liver and breast with different sauces. It was pretty good. Hardest part was getting over the raw part and I didn't die. Would order raw chicken gizzard again, it was a neat texture. |
Chicken sashimi
Agreed, it tastes great. I have a hard time eating it though due to texture which I have been trained since a toddler not to eat.
|
Yeah, eating raw chicken goes against everything I have ever known.
|
What country did you eat this in?
|
Japan.
Only place I would even consider eating raw chicken. |
Personally I'm against eating raw chicken as I just don't trust it... but I've heard good things I guess.
|
Originally Posted by Taiwaned
(Post 26068979)
Japan.
Only place I would even consider eating raw chicken. |
I think I'd only eat it in Japan but when I'm there I do eat it quite a bit (but not as much as raw horse/basashi). What cuts are people finding unpalatable in terms of texture? That's just never been an issue for me with chicken sashimi while I do have a problem eating a lot of intestines due to texture.
|
The first time I tried it was in Miyazaki and 3 days later I was sicker than I had ever been (for about 3 days). I found out that a few of my co-workers as well as one of our hosts also got sick. The second time I tried, everything was fine. Still, it's not something I want to try again. Texturally, it is a bit strange to me.
|
I'd have a very hard time eating chicken sashimi, even if I knew it was super fresh and free from any diseases.
|
I've had it offered to me before but just couldn't do it, and I've eaten balut in Vietnam.
Sounds like I missed out though! Will be trying it should I go back to Japan one day. |
Originally Posted by Jams65
(Post 26090089)
The first time I tried it was in Miyazaki and 3 days later I was sicker than I had ever been (for about 3 days). I found out that a few of my co-workers as well as one of our hosts also got sick. The second time I tried, everything was fine. Still, it's not something I want to try again. Texturally, it is a bit strange to me.
|
Can I ask a stupid question? Won't one get extremely sick from eating raw chicken? Eating it raw goes against everything I've been told my whole life.
|
Originally Posted by swag
(Post 26094482)
After what happened, you had it again??? :eek:
|
Originally Posted by Taiwaned
(Post 26066150)
First time I had chicken sashimi.
Raw chicken - totally counter intuitive. Raw chicken hearts, gizzards, liver and breast with different sauces. It was pretty good. Hardest part was getting over the raw part and I didn't die. Would order raw chicken gizzard again, it was a neat texture. |
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 26095379)
Can I ask a stupid question? Won't one get extremely sick from eating raw chicken? Eating it raw goes against everything I've been told my whole life.
In any case, h-e-double-hockey-sticks no. |
I've gone as far as fugu to find the world's best sashimi. To me, even the best chicken is just basic sustenance food. Can't see it as legitimate sashimi, just seems like a novelty. Which I will pass on.
|
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 26095379)
Can I ask a stupid question? Won't one get extremely sick from eating raw chicken? Eating it raw goes against everything I've been told my whole life.
If the chicken is slaughtered in a way that does not contaminant it with material from the intestinal tract it is just as safe as any other meat. |
Originally Posted by powerplantop
(Post 26101314)
If the chicken is slaughtered in a way that does not contaminant it with
material from the intestinal tract it is just as safe as any other meat. for that matter, any other kind of raw animal (including fish sushi). Anyway, I've had it, and it's okay - I'd just as soon have hirame or something. |
Originally Posted by enviroian
(Post 26095379)
Can I ask a stupid question? Won't one get extremely sick from eating raw chicken? Eating it raw goes against everything I've been told my whole life.
|
Originally Posted by travellingwineO
(Post 26110247)
Eating under-cooked chicken is only dangerous if that chicken is infected with or colonized by Salmonella (or other bacteria. Salmonella is the most common and most notorious one). Salmonella is nearly endemic among chickens in the US. In many other parts of the world, salmonella in poultry is much less of a problem. Chicken that is not contaminated with Salmonella is perfectly safe to eat raw.
It should be noted, however, that salmonella and campylobacter are closely related and the infected chicken is safe to eat undercooked or raw if it has been slaughtered in a way that prevents the campylobacter to spread from the intestines. |
I'm reading this thread while eating cooked chicken and feeling a bit sick. I admit that I'm brainwashed by USA norms, but I find it hard to eat undercooked chicken and I would not eat it raw, even in Japan. However, I'm not an adventurous eater and I suspect I wouldn't be intimidated enough to succumb when faced with such a Japanese "test."
|
Originally Posted by hannisen
(Post 26110616)
There are other bacteria in chicken that will also cause food poisoning, besides salmonella where campylobacter is the main one. In Sweden there is little to no salmonella in chicken, but they still urge you to prepare it well.
It should be noted, however, that salmonella and campylobacter are closely related and the infected chicken is safe to eat undercooked or raw if it has been slaughtered in a way that prevents the campylobacter to spread from the intestines. addendum: Ok, I've just had a think about this and it makes no sense. If the offending bacteria came only from the gut, then it would only be present on the surface of any involved meat. If that were the case, chicken could be treated just like we treat lamb and beef- as long as the surface of the meat reaches a temperature that is sufficient to treat the offending bacteria, the interior temp would be irrelevant. Either Salmonella & Campylobacter are present in the flesh of the chicken, rather than just the gut, or the FDA is providing guidelines that vastly exceed what is necessary. Interesting.... |
It's mostly in the way chickens are processed in the US, dragged
through vats of liquid in which the bacteria have accidentally been introduced. The length of immersion has been said to be long enough so that pathogens can contaminate not only the surface but also to some degree the interior of the flesh - different from other meats, which are slaughtered and processed mostly dry, with any washing being done using running water spray rather than immersion. Seems to me that if chicken bathing were done in a sufficiently concentrated brine, this issue could be obviated. In any case, I'm comfortable eating rare or even raw chicken in other first-world countries and eating pink-in-the-middle chicken anywhere in the world. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:30 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.