![]() |
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 18702725)
When you pay a corkage fee, the waiter gets nothing of that unless you tip them.
|
Originally Posted by TBD
(Post 18702770)
True - but that's an issue for the waiter and restaurant, no? I'd happily give the $15 corking fee to the waiter and not the restaurant. Why should I pay both entities if only one actually did something?
Chris |
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 18703110)
As a server at a restaurant that gets a fair share of bottles brought in, I've always thought it would be most fair to pay a $20 corkage, with $10 of that going to the house and $10 to the server. Then you wouldn't have to tip additionally unless you felt otherwise inclined.
Chris |
if this is a grand cru, the wine has a $3-400 shelf price. the wine list price would be around $450-600.
if this is a second or third, and not a grand cru, shelf is a bit over $200, and would be on the wine list at around $300-350. seems to me that $100 would be a reasonable corkage fee. for the hundred bucks: bring the bottle in two days in advance. keep it on its' side as it has been stored. to start service, have them put it in a cradle, and open it. never with rotation. smell the decanter and the glasses for detergent. if detergent smell, rinse twice in red wine. if smell is ok, rinse just once. the rinse wine does not have to be expensive, but should be dry.(i have presumed all along this is a red.) does not take much. check glasses one last time have the wine candled with the transfer to the decanter. an 86 probably will not throw much sediment, as it is pretty young. bring a bottle of something you will really like, that you know will be a good substitute if the 86 is off. 25 yo bordeaux is pretty young, but if it has not been stored properly, or with bad luck, have something decent to keep from ruining the evening. the second bottle should be a corkage free, unless it is on the restaurant menu. |
They want you to purchase their wine is all. Just purchase something off of the menu. The only way I would consider paying the $22 is if I went to purchase a $3 bottle of wine. Congratulations by the way.
|
Originally Posted by slawecki
(Post 18703735)
bring the bottle in two days in advance.
keep it on its' side as it has been stored. to start service, have them put it in a cradle, and open it. never with rotation. smell the decanter and the glasses for detergent. if detergent smell, rinse twice in red wine. if smell is ok, rinse just once. the rinse wine does not have to be expensive, but should be dry.(i have presumed all along this is a red.) does not take much. check glasses one last time have the wine candled with the transfer to the decanter. an 86 probably will not throw much sediment, as it is pretty young. bring a bottle of something you will really like, that you know will be a good substitute if the 86 is off. 25 yo bordeaux is pretty young, but if it has not been stored properly, or with bad luck, have something decent to keep from ruining the evening. the second bottle should be a corkage free, unless it is on the restaurant menu. |
Originally Posted by TBD
(Post 18703448)
I'm on board with splitting the income. $20 still seems excessive. Even using the typical 10-20% tip guideline, your $10 is equivalent to a $50-$100 bottle!
Case in point, I worked for a long time at a nicer restaurant that didn't have any corkage. Regular guests would go to the liquor store and buy the exact same bottle of wine as was on our list, come in and drink it, and then not tip at all on the bottle of wine. A corkage fee with some substance would have prevented that. Chris |
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 18712438)
I agree that it might seem like a lot for people who haven't often paid corkage fees, but the restaurants don't want you to bring in your own wine. They want you to order off of their list so they can make a profit. The "sweet spot" price should be one that is high enough to prevent people from bringing in their own "non-special" wine, but not so high that it makes people not want to dine there.
Case in point, I worked for a long time at a nicer restaurant that didn't have any corkage. Regular guests would go to the liquor store and buy the exact same bottle of wine as was on our list, come in and drink it, and then not tip at all on the bottle of wine. A corkage fee with some substance would have prevented that. Chris I believe that the reasonable corkage fee ought to be somewhere around the expected profit margin (as opposed to revenue) from beverage service at an average table of the restaurant. And I'd be surprised if that number is greater than $15-20 or so per table on average. It ought to be viewed as a means of compensating them for their opportunity cost that they are sacrificing by not getting to sell the patron some alcohol to accompany their meal. On top of that, tipping on the corkage IS appropriate, because that compensates the server, whereas the corkage compensates the restaurant for their opportunity cost sacrificed by not selling the patron the sort of wine an average table buys. Of course, there are quite a few restaurants that have recognized the value in cultivating wine enthusiasts as a client base, because they tend to be among the opinion leaders in matters of trendy restaurants and cuisines, and those restaurants do this by offering very economical (say $10-12 a bottle) corkage fees. This sort of corkage pricing at least covers the cost of providing the wine service, while also tending to encourage more repeat business among the wine enthusiast clientele, as well as positive word of mouth from these customers, who, as I stated above, tend to be opinion leaders in terms of creating buzz in the community folks who appreciate good food and wine. That being said, it's one thing to offer cheap corkage on special bottles, that are unique, and beyond the typical restaurant's ability to stock in their cellar inventory, but it's quite another to offer cheap corkage on any old $12-20 bottle that's currently on sale at the BevMo, and happens also to be on the restaurant's wine list for $30-50. I can certainly see why a restaurant would feel abused in that scenario - as after all, their value added should include not just the cost of serving the wine with proper stemware and wait-staff time, but also in properly choosing the better values among those widely available bottles, and offering good advice as to what wines pair particularly well with the particular dishes that they serve. |
Originally Posted by DJGMaster1
(Post 18712868)
That's all well and good if one is planning to drink a 3-5 year-old bottle of wine of the sort that is normally found on restaurant wine lists. But the OP is bringing a 25 year-old classified growth Bordeaux that certainly is worth in the hundreds of dollars at retail. IMHO, most restaurants should feel honored that the OP considers their cuisine to be worthy of his special wine.
I believe that the reasonable corkage fee ought to be somewhere around the expected profit margin (as opposed to revenue) from beverage service at an average table of the restaurant. And I'd be surprised if that number is greater than $15-20 or so per table on average. It ought to be viewed as a means of compensating them for their opportunity cost that they are sacrificing by not getting to sell the patron some alcohol to accompany their meal. On top of that, tipping on the corkage IS appropriate, because that compensates the server, whereas the corkage compensates the restaurant for their opportunity cost sacrificed by not selling the patron the sort of wine an average table buys. Of course, there are quite a few restaurants that have recognized the value in cultivating wine enthusiasts as a client base, because they tend to be among the opinion leaders in matters of trendy restaurants and cuisines, and those restaurants do this by offering very economical (say $10-12 a bottle) corkage fees. This sort of corkage pricing at least covers the cost of providing the wine service, while also tending to encourage more repeat business among the wine enthusiast clientele, as well as positive word of mouth from these customers, who, as I stated above, tend to be opinion leaders in terms of creating buzz in the community folks who appreciate good food and wine. That being said, it's one thing to offer cheap corkage on special bottles, that are unique, and beyond the typical restaurant's ability to stock in their cellar inventory, but it's quite another to offer cheap corkage on any old $12-20 bottle that's currently on sale at the BevMo, and happens also to be on the restaurant's wine list for $30-50. I can certainly see why a restaurant would feel abused in that scenario - as after all, their value added should include not just the cost of serving the wine with proper stemware and wait-staff time, but also in properly choosing the better values among those widely available bottles, and offering good advice as to what wines pair particularly well with the particular dishes that they serve. As to the beverage markup, having seen what my various restaurants pay for the wines (about 10% less than liquor store prices on average, unless it's a large chain who has corporate pricing), I would say $20-$30 per bottle for most restaurants would probably be typical. Hence the $20 corkage makes sense to me. But, if I were running a restaurant, I'd make sure we had quality wine glasses and decanters so people would feel that they're getting a value for that cost. Having one night a week with no corkage could be a promotion to get the more wine savvy to come to the restaurant. But if I were a restaurant owner, it would only be on a night that I needed to drive some more business, as opposed to always having a cheaper corkage fee, but that's just me. Chris |
Originally Posted by JayhawkCO
(Post 18712922)
Having one night a week with no corkage could be a promotion to get the more wine savvy to come to the restaurant. But if I were a restaurant owner, it would only be on a night that I needed to drive some more business, as opposed to always having a cheaper corkage fee, but that's just me.
Chris |
Originally Posted by DJGMaster1
(Post 18712980)
Hey, as someone who is retired (and hence, every day is a day of leisure), I'm all in favor of $5 corkage on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. I'd be all over it.
It depends on restaurants. Sometimes they change it and sometimes not. It also depends on the type relationship you establish with waiter and other staff on first visit. |
$25 is pretty standard around here and I don't eat in Michelin Star type places. God knows what they charge ! I always corkage and I prefer to think of how much I saved, not how much I got nicked. If I give the sommelier a taste, I find the corkage is often waved. My 86s are tasting pretty good right now, but their peak may be in another 10 years IMO. I don't think my 85s are getting any better. It was a softer fruit forward vintage. wj
|
Originally Posted by TBD
(Post 18702647)
Americans are too frivolous to pay attention to where their money goes.
And your authority on this generalization is? To answer the question though, $22 seems reasonable and par for the course in a major American city. |
I think this depends on what the restaurant actually does. I've seen them come over, no decanter, uncork the bottle, pour into regular glasses without decanting, and leave the bottle for me to pour seconds. In that case, the $20 is a penalty fee for bringing my own bottle.
If they provide a proper decanting service, good stemware, etc, then the fee is for a service and perhaps reasonable. |
I appreciate all of the comments including those about the wine service and the Bordeaux wines of 1986. For those who are interested, I probably had about thirty 1986 Bordeaux wines at one time that I bought within a few years of the release date. I took a look tonight and found out I am down to a dozen. Some of the wines had price stickers on them. From what I can tell I paid between $21-$36 for the wines. The storage has been decent but not ideal. They have been stored under my basement stairwell. They have been exposed to 60-65 degree temps most of the time and less than perfect humidity. None of the wines I have tasted have been bad and most have been good to great.
Here's what I have remaining: Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande Chateau Cos D'Estournel Chateau Talbot Chateau Lynch Bages Chateau Meyney Chateau Leoville Barton Chateau Gruaud Larose My wife is a seafood nut who generally chooses bubbles over red any day. I may save my corkage fee for another restaurant experience. I am not worried about the storage conditions other than dealing with a dry cork. The wines still have a youthful appearance. I have a pressurized cork screw to get the tough ones out. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:34 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.