![]() |
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
(Post 16875703)
notsosmart, nationality has nothing to do with knowledge of food, regardless of where that food comes from.
There is a true, in-bred food "culture" in many countries, (France, Italy, etc.), which doesn't exist in others. The foodie phenomenon is an artificial attempt at creating such a culture. Fundamentally, this is a good thing, as others have pointed out. But too many people here (in the USA, where I live, so I know), take it to a silly extreme all the while professing to intrinsically understand something that they really don't. Just because something is for sale at Dean and DeLuca it doesn't necessarily mean it's good, and that the purchaser can claim some sort of mystical knowledge of the product that they didn't know existed 3 weeks ago. The same goes for the granola Whole Foods crowd (of which I am a part-time member). |
Originally Posted by Alpha
(Post 16876039)
The phenomenon you're describing is largely specific to those obnoxious people. You see many more people "thinking about what they are eating" because you run in circles where people talk about it. I would argue that the notion that it's spreading to the parts of the country that need to start caring more about their diets is demonstrably false and largely impossible because the "farm to table" thing (in its current form, at least) is far more expensive than those people can afford. The farm-to-table zeitgeist demands much more than a backyard garden. And in any event, for the poor, a garden is not the beginning of some teleological progression toward a healthy "food cycle (insert foodie buzzword here)" or something. It's easy to forget that the ultimate reason poor people tend to eat less healthfully is that healthful food is more expensive; mass produced crap is always going to be cheaper.
I don't think it's an impossible cycle to break, but as with most things that are common in our moderately wealthy circles, they have virtually no resemblance to or effect on what happens in urban ghettos and rural America. You might as well be sticking your head in the sand if you think that only eating at restaurants with locally sourced ingredients and growing tomatoes on your fire escape has anything to do with what Joe Schmo in rural Kansas is eating for lunch. Indeed, fast food continues to be a growing industry in spite of the fact that increasing numbers of affluent people now refuse to eat it. And I agree that much of the discussion is happening among those who wouldn't eat fast food anyway, but I disagree that it is not happening elsewhere. I grew up in poverty, eating fast food nearly every meal after the food stamps were used up, as did most of my friends. Nearly everyone I grew up with is now very focused on what they eat, and many of them are not exactly "affluent." I think that's a good thing. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:48 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.