Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 34868199)
Any pilot with that attitude should lose license.
Originally Posted by Beetles
(Post 34866814)
Blaming the very real logistical issues at JFK that do not ever affect MSP (ever) on the workforce at JFK is just crass. NYC airports are what they are.
What’s crass is making excuses that pass the problem down the line, as the messes risk becoming not only more likely down the road but even a bigger mess for more travelers in the future. Excuses to defend the status quo or to marginalize criticism typically rely upon facts picked to avoid facing comparisons and the reality that there are problems which can and should be fixed. The excuse-making/accepting mentality mean problems get a pass despite what it means for the next messes to come. The “oh, but we/they are different” is just cover for excuses. I don’t buy the idea that DL@JFK shouldn’t and couldn’t do better just because it’s NYC. But if DL and the other airlines aren’t able and willing to be more proactive to minimize messes hitting travelers at JFK or wherever, then they need to be delivered a lesson by way of something like a US-equivalent to EC 261/2004. |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 34869088)
Losing licenses should be for serious stuff — not for a DL pilot landing with proper clearance to land and supplying entertaining communications to the passengers eagerly awaiting landing as soon as possible.
Management gets the employees it deserves. What’s crass is making excuses that pass the problem down the line, as the messes risk becoming not only more likely down the road but even a bigger mess for more travelers in the future. Excuses to defend the status quo or to marginalize criticism typically rely upon facts picked to avoid facing comparisons and the reality that there are problems which can and should be fixed. The excuse-making/accepting mentality mean problems get a pass despite what it means for the next messes to come. The “oh, but we/they are different” is just cover for excuses. I don’t buy the idea that DL@JFK shouldn’t and couldn’t do better just because it’s NYC. But if DL and the other airlines aren’t able and willing to be more proactive to minimize messes hitting travelers at JFK or wherever, then they need to be delivered a lesson by way of something like a US-equivalent to EC 261/2004. |
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 34869193)
They would actually believe it, beliving it an insult (or as a challenge) to their abilities if they couldn't.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 34869198)
If triggering themselves like that, then they should be subject to another test to see if the job is still truly suitable for their psychological state.
|
Originally Posted by Beetles
(Post 34866814)
Blaming the very real logistical issues at JFK that do not ever affect MSP (ever) on the workforce at JFK is just crass. NYC airports are what they are.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 34869088)
Losing licenses should be for serious stuff — not for a DL pilot landing with proper clearance to land and supplying entertaining communications to the passengers eagerly awaiting landing as soon as possible.
Management gets the employees it deserves. What’s crass is making excuses that pass the problem down the line, as the messes risk becoming not only more likely down the road but even a bigger mess for more travelers in the future. Excuses to defend the status quo or to marginalize criticism typically rely upon facts picked to avoid facing comparisons and the reality that there are problems which can and should be fixed. The excuse-making/accepting mentality mean problems get a pass despite what it means for the next messes to come. The “oh, but we/they are different” is just cover for excuses. I don’t buy the idea that DL@JFK shouldn’t and couldn’t do better just because it’s NYC. But if DL and the other airlines aren’t able and willing to be more proactive to minimize messes hitting travelers at JFK or wherever, then they need to be delivered a lesson by way of something like a US-equivalent to EC 261/2004. The day in question was one of the most challenging ever for ground crews across the country. At JFK, below-wing DL people were dealing with: - sudden drop in temperature after a day of rain: this meant anything sitting in water (all the jetbridges, for example) was frozen in place. - burst pipes in T4: geysers of water spewing throughout their workspace and offices requires ground crews to hustle to deal with that issue, taking time away from working flights - thousands of bags that were needing processing because of cancellations and misconnects. People here love to make snide comments about NYC work ethic or whatever. Fact is, it’s significantly harder to work there for many many reasons. And the line employees are trying damn hard. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.