Community
Wiki Posts
Search

China Southern to leave Skyteam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2018, 1:03 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,394
Originally Posted by BenA
Huh. That article doesnt actually quote anyone saying Xiamen leaving. I mean, we all assume it's going to happen at some point if not immediately, but I wonder if it's just the author assuming it will happen because it's a CZ subisidary, or if it's actually sourced with a statement from a spokesperson. (I ask because Reuters specifically reached out to a Xiamen spokesperson and was explicitly told they're staying for the foreseeable future, so somebody here on one side or the other is confused..)
I misread the article, where it said MF was owned by CZ I read it as they were taking them with them leaving ST.

I'm sure there will be individuals for this will be impactfull , but it's a drop in the bucket for DL especially. And it might even help them move some traffic to the DL/MU orbit.
kop84 is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 4:13 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond 1.7MM, Starlux Insighter, Bonvoy Titanium, Hilton Gold, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,947
Originally Posted by moondog
CX doesn't want any Chinese carriers in OW. If AA drops its HK routes, perhaps they will change their tune.
This is indeed the common perception, and who can blame them - why deal with any competition at all? But, as I said, I think the combination of government pressure and their diminishing financial situation could change the calculus.

My hot take is that CZ wouldn’t be leaving SkyTeam unless they already had a new alliance membership ready to go behind the scenes. They’re saying publicly they are fine moving forward as independent to save on alliance membership fees, and perhaps this is true - so much of their business is domestic and they’ve never really been a huge connecting player anyway. But I don’t buy it - with the AA investment in CZ and the years of OW rumors, I firmly believe this is already sorted out behind the scenes and CZ will join OneWorld, possibly with an announcement as soon as January 1 once this formally takes effect.

As you say, AA is probably a party to the whole negotiation. If a TPAC joint venture is announced involving some of these players, I won’t be surprised at all. I’d be surprised if it’s a straight up route-cancellation-for-membership deal, though, for compliance reasons if nothing else.

Edited to add after further thought: One possible outcome if you are right and CX does hold the line is a deep AA/CZ joint venture partnership that excludes CX and other alliance partners entirely, similar to DL/VS. If that happens, they may not enter OneWorld, but it will raise serious questions about the alliance dynamics with CX and could force them into a bit of self imposed isolation as others simply work around their obstinance.
BenA is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 4:20 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond 1.7MM, Starlux Insighter, Bonvoy Titanium, Hilton Gold, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,947
Originally Posted by kop84
I misread the article, where it said MF was owned by CZ I read it as they were taking them with them leaving ST.

I'm sure there will be individuals for this will be impactfull , but it's a drop in the bucket for DL especially. And it might even help them move some traffic to the DL/MU orbit.
You didn’t misread it - they explicitly say that MF is leaving too in the article you shared, so you’re not going crazy. It’s just that there’s conflicting information out there, so only time or a clarification will tell which article is correct.
BenA is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 5:51 pm
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by BenA


This is indeed the common perception, and who can blame them - why deal with any competition at all? But, as I said, I think the combination of government pressure and their diminishing financial situation could change the calculus.

My hot take is that CZ wouldn’t be leaving SkyTeam unless they already had a new alliance membership ready to go behind the scenes. They’re saying publicly they are fine moving forward as independent to save on alliance membership fees, and perhaps this is true - so much of their business is domestic and they’ve never really been a huge connecting player anyway. But I don’t buy it - with the AA investment in CZ and the years of OW rumors, I firmly believe this is already sorted out behind the scenes and CZ will join OneWorld, possibly with an announcement as soon as January 1 once this formally takes effect.

As you say, AA is probably a party to the whole negotiation. If a TPAC joint venture is announced involving some of these players, I won’t be surprised at all. I’d be surprised if it’s a straight up route-cancellation-for-membership deal, though, for compliance reasons if nothing else.

Edited to add after further thought: One possible outcome if you are right and CX does hold the line is a deep AA/CZ joint venture partnership that excludes CX and other alliance partners entirely, similar to DL/VS. If that happens, they may not enter OneWorld, but it will raise serious questions about the alliance dynamics with CX and could force them into a bit of self imposed isolation as others simply work around their obstinance.
I am close friends with a guy who many of you know (e.g. serial airline exec who built the DL brand in China). I asked him about Chinese airlines in OW several years ago, and he told me such will never happen because CX/KA can serve most of China via their nice airport in Hong Kong.
moondog is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 6:02 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
Originally Posted by moondog
I am close friends with a guy who many of you know (e.g. serial airline exec who built the DL brand in China). I asked him about Chinese airlines in OW several years ago, and he told me such will never happen because CX/KA can serve most of China via their nice airport in Hong Kong.
I think that logic holds true for a while.. but not indefinitely. China's air market is going to be huge. It will surpass the United State's in less than a decade, and will almost certainly be double that of the US by 2045. There's enough room for two carriers in a market that will hold 25%+ of the world's passenger volume.
ethernal is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 6:30 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GA
Programs: VA-PLT, QF-GLD, DL-GM, UA-ex1K, AA-exPLT, HH-DM, IHG-PLT, MR-GLD
Posts: 8,242
Originally Posted by BenA
They’re saying publicly they are fine moving forward as independent to save on alliance membership fees, and perhaps this is true - so much of their business is domestic and they’ve never really been a huge connecting player anyway. But I don’t buy it - with the AA investment in CZ and the years of OW rumors, I firmly believe this is already sorted out behind the scenes and CZ will join OneWorld, possibly with an announcement as soon as January 1 once this formally takes effect.
Interesting theory, but I give it a <1% chance of being right. CX isn't going to let them into OW, full stop.

I expect CZ to cozy up with a few OW members for the near future, and try to become a defacto member, hoping CX looks towards *A. But it certainly isn't a done deal, and won't be for some time.
CPMaverick is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 6:40 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond 1.7MM, Starlux Insighter, Bonvoy Titanium, Hilton Gold, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,947
Originally Posted by CPMaverick
Interesting theory, but I give it a <1% chance of being right. CX isn't going to let them into OW, full stop.

I expect CZ to cozy up with a few OW members for the near future, and try to become a defacto member, hoping CX looks towards *A. But it certainly isn't a done deal, and won't be for some time.
It’s certainly possible that the conventional wisdom about CX is correct - it is conventional, after all. This’ll be a fun one to watch from the sidelines either way. If we hit 2020 and CZ is still unaffiliated - either with OneWorld or at least an AA JV - I’ll cheerfully buy you folks a beverage of your choice at a future do
BenA is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 7:05 pm
  #23  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
@MoDs: we now have two threads on this topic, and there are likely to be more. I suggest consolidating them in the other Asian forum.
moondog is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 7:16 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GA
Programs: VA-PLT, QF-GLD, DL-GM, UA-ex1K, AA-exPLT, HH-DM, IHG-PLT, MR-GLD
Posts: 8,242
Originally Posted by BenA
It’s certainly possible that the conventional wisdom about CX is correct - it is conventional, after all. This’ll be a fun one to watch from the sidelines either way. If we hit 2020 and CZ is still unaffiliated - either with OneWorld or at least an AA JV - I’ll cheerfully buy you folks a beverage of your choice at a future do
I wouldn't bet against an AA JV... but betting against OW is easy money. IMO

It will be an interesting one!
BenA likes this.
CPMaverick is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 7:19 pm
  #25  
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,928
Originally Posted by moondog
@MoDs: we now have two threads on this topic, and there are likely to be more. I suggest consolidating them in the other Asian forum.
And one in the SkyTeam forum too...
Zorak is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 8:26 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Just booked what'll be final award involving CZ. CZ CHC-CAN then AF CAN-CDG-DUB. 90K for J.
flyerCO is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2018, 11:20 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PHX, SEA
Programs: Avis President's Club, Global Entry, Hilton/Marriott Gold. No more DL/AA status.
Posts: 4,422
Well this is a bummer mostly because China Southern has had some amazing J fares recently and I've been tempted to take one. The MQMs would have been delightful! But I guess if they join OW or at least an AA partnership I won't lose out completely, just on status.
Gig103 is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2018, 8:36 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
Originally Posted by moondog
@MoDs: we now have two threads on this topic, and there are likely to be more. I suggest consolidating them in the other Asian forum.
Fair but a lot of folks on the Delta forum don't read those other forums, and the type of impact will differ by airline. So I would recommend keeping a version of it here as well..
BenA likes this.
ethernal is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2018, 8:53 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,712
Originally Posted by BenA
Bummer, but not unexpected.

I wonder if and when this will affect Xiamen Airlines. They’re 55% owned by CZ, so you kind of expect they will follow the mothership, but they may wait to make the move for another year or two until CZ’s new alliance membership is solidified (almost certainly in OneWorld).

This leaves SkyTeam with a gaping hole in South China you can fly an A380 through, although I do agree CZ/MF weren’t really filling that hole well given the limited nature of the partnership. I wonder if HX would be interested in an alliance?
HX would actually be a pretty nice pickup. They’re trying to expand and become more relevant to global travelers. A DL partnership might make sense.
KDCAflyer is offline  
Old Nov 17, 2018, 9:44 am
  #30  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Originally Posted by ethernal
Fair but a lot of folks on the Delta forum don't read those other forums, and the type of impact will differ by airline. So I would recommend keeping a version of it here as well..
All links can point to the same thread. No big deal.
moondog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.