![]() |
Originally Posted by Sabai
(Post 18369422)
I would suspect that the Diesel Nine drivers are also among the most experienced pilots around, which is a good thing; I likes my pilots with a touch of gray.
|
Originally Posted by Down3Green
(Post 18369578)
Well, it's a good theory and I hate to mess with your comfort zone, but since the DC9 is the smallest and lowest paying equipment, it is also the most Junior. The Captains will likely be in their first Captain's seat and the F/Os are almost entirely from the most recent batch of new hires. With that said, the category is shrinking with the drawdown (only the DTW and the new ATL base are left) and as pilots are displaced to other planes, it will generally leave the most relatively senior Capts and F/Os within category flying those last couple flights.
|
Originally Posted by DLdweeb
(Post 18369741)
I'm not sure this is true. I have heard that DC9 captains are some of the most experienced, and they bid these routes because they can be back home the same day after the short runs the DC9s make. In addition, they actually enjoy flying these birds. Virtually every DC9 captain (and FO for that matter) I have seen seemed to be very experienced and not at all junior.
|
Originally Posted by DLdweeb
(Post 18369741)
I'm not sure this is true. I have heard that DC9 captains are some of the most experienced, and they bid these routes because they can be back home the same day after the short runs the DC9s make. In addition, they actually enjoy flying these birds. Virtually every DC9 captain (and FO for that matter) I have seen seemed to be very experienced and not at all junior.
I have flown on DC9-30's with USAirways and those planes were solid as a rock, the problem is they had a lot of delays with them. Obviously Delta's DC9-50s have gone through heavy maintenance checks and are in excellent condition, plus you are not getting novice pilots flying these planes. |
Originally Posted by adamj023
(Post 18369818)
Delta's mainline safety record speaks for itself, but the DC9-50 pilots are not going to be new trainees, because they do not teach new pilots how to fly the DC9-50 anymore and I agree with the previous poster, none of the pilots on the DC9-50 are going to be junior. They likely are going to be the oldest hires ready to retire rather than taking on new certifications for other aircraft now flying. There could indeed be pilots with certifications for multiple aircraft flying the DC9-50's but again, these are likely going to be people who were flying the DC9-50's previously.
I have flown on DC9-30's with USAirways and those planes were solid as a rock, the problem is they had a lot of delays with them. Obviously Delta's DC9-50s have gone through heavy maintenance checks and are in excellent condition, plus you are not getting novice pilots flying these planes. Now, compare the age/experience of DC-9 pilots with that of the junior league regional jet pilots on the RJ's that are replacing the DC-9s. Don't get me wrong. All, we can presume, are professionals with thoughts of safety in the forefront. But, one group has fewer years in the seat. |
Originally Posted by Sabai
(Post 18369422)
I would suspect that the Diesel Nine drivers are also among the most experienced pilots around, which is a good thing; I likes my pilots with a touch of gray.
|
Originally Posted by MM/PM widget
(Post 18370055)
My rule of thumb when I started flying was to fly on a plane younger than me flown by a pilot older than me. Obviously as I have aged both have been near impossible to achieve :cool: YMMV
|
Originally Posted by DLdweeb
(Post 18369741)
I'm not sure this is true. I have heard that DC9 captains are some of the most experienced, and they bid these routes because they can be back home the same day after the short runs the DC9s make.
Originally Posted by JGfromOC
Yeah, from what I know, the most senior pilots are the one's flying the shorter routes - same goes for the senior FA's. Not always, but by and large this seems to be the case
Originally Posted by adamj023
Delta's mainline safety record speaks for itself, but the DC9-50 pilots are not going to be new trainees, because they do not teach new pilots how to fly the DC9-50 anymore
Now, on the plus side, because of the general stagnation on the pilot side of the airline, even the most junior Captain has at least 10 years at DL, so it's not like they're wet behind the ears, but they are the most junior Captains at DL. Further, as someone who has over 6000 hours in DC9 derivatives, I'll be glad to tell you that it's a hell of a plane. You can drain every drop of hydraulic fluid out of it and remove all electrical power and it'll barely know the difference in terms of flying. |
To the OP...if you don't want a DC9...
Going back to the OP's point
Um, not to be snarky BUT... if you are flying from LAX to ORD and connecting thru DTW, you are clearly loyal to Delta vs the many other non-stops AA, UA, WN, etc, etc.... And if you're gonna be loyal to Delta by flying past ORD and connecting to DTW, then you're gonna have to fly on some DC9s once in a while.... |
Originally Posted by FL2009
(Post 18370229)
Going back to the OP's point
Um, not to be snarky BUT... if you are flying from LAX to ORD and connecting thru DTW, you are clearly loyal to Delta vs the many other non-stops AA, UA, WN, etc, etc.... And if you're gonna be loyal to Delta by flying past ORD and connecting to DTW, then you're gonna have to fly on some DC9s once in a while.... |
Originally Posted by EXLEFTSEAT
(Post 18360322)
These 9s are wonderful machines, they were with NW formerly and are of course well maintained. I recently flew a DC 3, which is considerably older. What a pleasure. That's what flying is all about. Enjoy the ride in a semi historic plane, I hear they will not be around with DL much longer. As another poster mentioned, I prefer the 9 to a Barbie Jet any time of the day.
Originally Posted by MileageAddict
(Post 18361611)
I love the DC-9s. I wish Delta had more of them.
Originally Posted by Tide_from_PAE
(Post 18362396)
I'm going to miss the DC9-50's and would like to be on the final DC9-50 flight or a DC9-50 retirement DO. From a technical standpoint, the aircraft can leave the gate under its own power, has proven to be very solidly built, has reasonable fuel economy on short routes, and was able to be "modernized" enough that most passengers won't be able to tell that the plane is 30+ years old unless they look in the cockpit.
I find it cool to be on an aircraft that is still in commercial service in the lower 48 after 30+ years. Normally, to fly on that old of an aircraft on a scheduled commercial airline, one has to fly to a 3rd world country or Alaska, the latter being a popular destination of smaller older aircraft. I was very happy when Delta started scheduling the DC9-50's out of ATL as it means that I can often start and end my trip by flying a DC9-50 to/from BHM. |
Originally Posted by StayingHomeIsBetter
(Post 18370018)
^
Now, compare the age/experience of DC-9 pilots with that of the junior league regional jet pilots on the RJ's that are replacing the DC-9s. Don't get me wrong. All, we can presume, are professionals with thoughts of safety in the forefront. But, one group has fewer years in the seat. All of the firms like Southwest, JetBlue, Delta, USAirways and United and more have excellent training procedures in their mainline fleet along with extremely well trained pilots. Time and time again these firms have shown their competency. But you are right, in the regional market, it isn't up to the same standards. You get these really young overworked pilots using in some cases turboprops which are minimalistic planes which even the most experienced pilots would have serious limitations working with. |
Originally Posted by adamj023
(Post 18369818)
Delta's mainline safety record speaks for itself, but the DC9-50 pilots are not going to be new trainees, because they do not teach new pilots how to fly the DC9-50 anymore and I agree with the previous poster, none of the pilots on the DC9-50 are going to be junior.
|
Originally Posted by adamj023
(Post 18369818)
Delta's mainline safety record speaks for itself, but the DC9-50 pilots are not going to be new trainees, because they do not teach new pilots how to fly the DC9-50 anymore and I agree with the previous poster, none of the pilots on the DC9-50 are going to be junior.
Originally Posted by simuflite
(Post 18371558)
Not sure where you are getting your information from.
|
Originally Posted by simuflite
(Post 18371558)
Not sure where you are getting your information from. The DC9-50 fleet has been extended into 2013 and the training equipment (including one full flight simulator) are being moved from MSP to ATL in the fall. New hires in recent months have gone to the DC9.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:14 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.