Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2020, 4:41 am
  #3691  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
I emailed scotgov about testing for travel and they replied saying it is not a priority and they want testing capacity for local testing.
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 4:43 am
  #3692  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
Swedish figures are getting so low, surely it must be go green next week. Another anomaly within Europe is Bulgaria -- figures have been good for a while now but still red for everyone. Singapore not going green for others is an odd one, too.

At 30 per 100k, Denmark red-lists countries so I imagine that by next week, if the trend continues, the UK will be on the Danish red list.
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 1:04 pm
  #3693  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,238
Boris is clearly not for testing on arrival as per the BBC, and again the 7% “myth’” is mentioned.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54031912
13901 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 2:05 pm
  #3694  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: LHR, LGW
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,444
Originally Posted by 13901
Boris is clearly not for testing on arrival as per the BBC, and again the 7% “myth’” is mentioned.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54031912
I have no idea regarding the 7% figures origin or evidence base but if they can only test 7 out of every 100 passengers without causing absolute chaos or uproar then that’s the only sense I can make for it.
rockflyertalk is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 3:05 pm
  #3695  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,238
Originally Posted by rockflyertalk
I have no idea regarding the 7% figures origin or evidence base but if they can only test 7 out of every 100 passengers without causing absolute chaos or uproar then that’s the only sense I can make for it.
It was discussed at length on this thread (but might’ve since been removed), however it referred to the fact that, allegedly, airport-based testing would intercept only 7% of potential positives. As I said, brunos debunked the paper on which the information was based and, in fairness, it seems to be flying in the face of what many other countries are doing. Anyway, testing is not going to be implemented, no matter how much the industry, or the press, scream about it.
orbitmic and rockflyertalk like this.
13901 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 3:15 pm
  #3696  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,238
Canada has started a study to measure the efficacy of a 14-day quarantine vs a rigorous testing policy. The study will take place over September with arrivals to Toronto. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.

source: https://onemileatatime.com/canada-co...-travel-study/
13901 is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 3:46 pm
  #3697  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: LHR, LGW
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 3,444
Originally Posted by 13901
It was discussed at length on this thread (but might’ve since been removed), however it referred to the fact that, allegedly, airport-based testing would intercept only 7% of potential positives. As I said, brunos debunked the paper on which the information was based and, in fairness, it seems to be flying in the face of what many other countries are doing. Anyway, testing is not going to be implemented, no matter how much the industry, or the press, scream about it.

Ok I missed all that. It’s hard to keep up with it all. But if LHR tried to test 4 flights loads of passengers who landed within an hour and even at 50% passenger loads, I really struggle to see how this could be done effectively and efficiently. I think it’s a way forward but it needs an efficient and high capacity operation for an airport like heathrow.
rockflyertalk is offline  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 5:40 pm
  #3698  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,851
The latest thinking is not to do any tests at the airport, I too think it would be a logistical nightmare if it does succeed in getting more people flying. But instead to invite people to self isolate initially, then at some point between day 5 to day 8 they could go for an NHS test, and be released sooner if negative. Grant Shapps has gone on the record on Friday suggesting this option (kite number 17 I would guess).
DaveS and rockflyertalk like this.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old Sep 4, 2020, 11:44 pm
  #3699  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,238
How can it be a logistical nightmare if other airports in Europe can do it? I was driving around LHR and there are lots of car parks lying around absolutely empty, including the NHS drive thru testing facility. Even the car park for T5 was empty.

If Rome FCO, once renowned for being the most disorganised airport in Europe, has managed to create testing for passengers coming from 4 countries within a couple of days then I refuse to believe that the UK can’t do the same. If there is a political will then there will be a way, but alas there isn’t.
orbitmic and DaveS like this.
13901 is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2020, 12:17 am
  #3700  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: M&S Elite+
Posts: 3,658
If there is profit in the tests they will find a way to do them. At £150 or £100, I am sure they can be very profitable. At IST they charge TL250=£25.

The Daily Mail are leading on this story again. Time to write to your MP if you would like to see this change.

Last edited by DaveS; Sep 5, 2020 at 1:24 am
DaveS is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2020, 4:07 am
  #3701  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,851


Here is the data for Saturday. Sweden has had a small data correction, though it doesn't change the overall improvement. Luxembourg is now below 100 for the first time in a while, though that's partly due to the data timelines. Not much good news elsewhere, other than perhaps Greece seems to have levelled off a bit. Elsewhere Gibraltar has hit 225, whereas South Africa (54) has now had 10 days of reductions.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old Sep 5, 2020, 4:58 am
  #3702  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,937
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave

Here is the data for Saturday. Sweden has had a small data correction, though it doesn't change the overall improvement. Luxembourg is now below 100 for the first time in a while, though that's partly due to the data timelines. Not much good news elsewhere, other than perhaps Greece seems to have levelled off a bit. Elsewhere Gibraltar has hit 225, whereas South Africa (54) has now had 10 days of reductions.
South africa starting to move out of winter so the situation improves as it warms up?
DaveS likes this.

Last edited by NWIFlyer; Sep 5, 2020 at 10:45 am Reason: Remove chart image
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2020, 5:00 am
  #3703  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,937
With Portugal now over 41 you perhaps need to question the decision not to have put it onto Englands quarantine list.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2020, 5:01 am
  #3704  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London, Sth Africa or LAS
Programs: VS Silver, BA Blue - finally; but hotels.com Gold :)
Posts: 1,858
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Here is the data for Saturday. Sweden has had a small data correction, though it doesn't change the overall improvement. Luxembourg is now below 100 for the first time in a while, though that's partly due to the data timelines. Not much good news elsewhere, other than perhaps Greece seems to have levelled off a bit. Elsewhere Gibraltar has hit 225, whereas South Africa (54) has now had 10 days of reductions.
Yes, South Africa has been trending down for a while; the Western Cape region projecting to 29.5 if the last week's numbers repeat. Which would be comparable to many in C-W-S's chart. Albeit the testing levels are not as high as in the UK, but probably not far off others in the chart.

Meanwhile Iceland is now at around 24, of which 1/3rd of that is the border testing (and which clouds their headline ECDC stats).

One curiosity for me, following C-W-S's chart is the ongoing divergence, again, of Spain, France, Italy and UK from Germany. I'm aware of things Spain are doing poorly, similarly some mis-steps here and there in UK .... but little good insight as to what Germany are consistently doing well and better.
If anything, adjusting and extrapolating for testing levels puts Germany even further in front. Is it the purity of the lager? presumably there are lessons to be learning.
alex67500 and DaveS like this.
littlefish is offline  
Old Sep 5, 2020, 5:16 am
  #3705  
Hilton 10+ BadgeAccor 10+ Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Rhineland-Palatinate
Programs: *A Gold (A3), HHonor Gold
Posts: 5,703
In Germany there are currently no clear explanation for the current decrease, we are not sure of why it is going better compared to a few weeks ago. There are probably several factors in there.
fransknorge is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.