![]() |
Masks are going to be with us for a long time. They're annoying, but better to wear them and have things come back somewhat to normal, than to not, prolonging all of this. Even in the absolute best case imaginable with a vaccine, only a fraction of the world will be vaccinated in a year's time.
|
Whether masks stay or not depends on the public opinion (at least in democracies). Living in a place that introduced them early and extensively (they were compulsory everywhere in public), I can see major shift in public opinion after several months and the support for mask-wearing diminished. In the beginning, many (most) people wore them even before they became compulsory. These days I see people mostly ignore the rule wherever it's not enforced. Few months ago, social media was full of people advocating for masks, these days I see most people take them off at the earliest opportunity and if someone talks about masks, it's all about getting rid of them. I believe the shift in public opinion will be similar in western Europe.
Austria is getting rid of face masks in shops from mid-June (they remain compulsory in some settings, such as services, but I hope that will be discontinued soon too). Slovakia just announced that face masks will no longer be compulsory outside and in offices, although they remain recommended. As another update, Slovakia will no longer enforce social distancing in restaurants and bars, there will no longer be a required spacing between tables (although government still recommends 2 meters) and it was announced that clubs should be allowed to open soon. |
Originally Posted by sbrower
(Post 32441083)
It will be different for many. And I am not advocating for rushing. But I agree with some of the above (which is why I am shocked at the U.S. stock market recovery rate). It will mean no mask, no realistic chance of a quarantine at any stop (including, but not limited to, when I return home), full food and beverage service and MOST facilities being open (including museums, transportation, etc.). OR it will mean accepting that travel under the conditions I have described won't be possible for 5 years in the future (and, even if I come to accept that travel won't be able to resume pleasantly for 5 years, while I might take a trip here and there, it will be 25% of what it would have been).
|
If there's any place where it makes sense to wear a mask it's in a cramped and crowded place like a plane. If outbreaks start getting traced back to flights, then it's going to be bad for air travel. So for those who want to get back to normal, I'm not sure that this is the best fight to have.
|
Originally Posted by Doppy
(Post 32442956)
If there's any place where it makes sense to wear a mask it's in a cramped and crowded place like a plane. If outbreaks start getting traced back to flights, then it's going to be bad for air travel. So for those who want to get back to normal, I'm not sure that this is the best fight to have.
It's stuffy places (like offices!) with no air circulation and lots of talking/yelling people that you gotta watch out for. |
Originally Posted by Doppy
(Post 32442956)
If there's any place where it makes sense to wear a mask it's in a cramped and crowded place like a plane. If outbreaks start getting traced back to flights, then it's going to be bad for air travel. So for those who want to get back to normal, I'm not sure that this is the best fight to have.
Well, each to their own. At this point it seems that most "open" / least restrictive destinations in Europe are within my driving distance anyway. I miss a more substantial change of enviroment, but it will have to wait until airlines stop treating me like a bio hazard. |
So far, due to luck, testing constraints, and highly infectious nature of COVID-19, airlines have avoided blame as an environment where COVID-19 has been transmitted (they are of course responsible for the international spread of the disease).
BUT, with contact tracing and testing in place in some countries, as well as air travel starting again it is only a matter of time before super spreader events are identified that occurred on airplanes. By way of comparison, we know SARS was spread on airplanes: https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa031349 https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...9a97d8862a.png Lastly, there are health exceptions to wearing a mouth and nose covering if you cannot breath easily with one. If you are healthy and cannot breath easily then I suspect you are wearing the wrong type of mask. I predict that wearing a mask will likely become a pre-requisite for flying (hopefully only until the pandemic is over) in the same way as wearing a seat-belt is (i.e. the announcement would be "when not eating or drinking, you are required to cover your mouth and nose"). Of course some people won't follow this (as today with seat-belts), some people will complain, but the vast majority of sensible reasonable people will follow the instructions and everyone will be safer for it. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.