![]() |
Overbooking First Class
This has been discussed here and at the DO's before, and the general understanding has been that F is never intentionally overbooked. Here, though, it looks like I've found at least one example where that's not the case. Check this flight out:
[KVS Availability Tool 3.0.2/Lite - Apollo: ITN/US-ARL] Code:
IAH Houston George Bush Intercnt'l TX US [KIAH] |
I bet it's just a miscommunication between the fleet scheduling department and revenue management regarding what type of airplane will ultimately operate that flight.
|
I show that it's a 12 seater in FCLass.
|
Looks like the Apollo data is slightly out-of-sync:
[KVS Availability Tool 3.0.2/Platinum - Sabre: ITN/UK-ASB] Code:
IAH Houston George Bush Intercnt'l TX US [KIAH] |
Originally Posted by KVS
(Post 9061967)
Looks like the Apollo data is slightly out-of-sync:
Originally Posted by sfogate
(Post 9061957)
I show that it's a 12 seater in FCLass.
|
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 9062088)
Interestingly, CO.com shows it as a 737-500 with 8 FC seats. Possible it's in the process of being changed, and all the systems haven't been updated yet.
[KVS Availability Tool 3.0.2/Platinum - Amadeus Seat Map: 28 Feb 2008/CO 821/IAH-JFK/735/F] Code:
A B | E F |
just checked shares and the aircraft type is a 737-500 and config is 12fc 112yc. Hope this helps
|
I wasn't aware that such a config existed in the CO fleet?? 733 maybe?
|
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 9062895)
I wasn't aware that such a config existed in the CO fleet?? 733 maybe?
|
Correct
Originally Posted by burghboys
(Post 9062926)
Its funny I just read effective 31jan06 all 737-500 aircraft have been configured with the new 8/106 seating. who knows?
|
I still maintain what I wrote in post #2 (or something along those lines). :p
|
AA used to routinely overbook First by 1 seat on domestic flights.
|
The 735 is like a cruel joke
I would love to see CO jettison the 735 from its fleet entirely. I cannot figure out why they fly those planes from EWR to a market like MIA, I'm really sick of it. 8 seats (2 rows) in FC, and the "bulkhead" is a weird fabric-y contraption, so the second row of FC reclines into the first row of coach. Pitiful.
|
Originally Posted by skipmnyc
(Post 9063763)
I would love to see CO jettison the 735 from its fleet entirely.
I cannot figure out why they fly those planes from EWR to a market like MIA, I'm really sick of it. 8 seats (2 rows) in FC, and the "bulkhead" is a weird fabric-y contraption, so the second row of FC reclines into the first row of coach. Pitiful. |
Originally Posted by OptionsCLE
(Post 9061753)
This has been discussed here and at the DO's before, and the general understanding has been that F is never intentionally overbooked. Here, though, it looks like I've found at least one example where that's not the case. Check this flight out:
[KVS Availability Tool 3.0.2/Lite - Apollo: ITN/US-ARL] Code:
IAH Houston George Bush Intercnt'l TX US [KIAH] |
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 9063308)
I still maintain what I wrote in post #2 (or something along those lines). :p
|
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 9069710)
A lot of airlines have this. I'm not sure why it matters so much. Are the folks in the Y bulkhead that much more prone to kicking your seat back when you're in row 2 compared to, say the folks behind you in FC if you were seated in row 1? Frankly, I like the curtain because it gives that row in Y more legroom which comes in handy to pre-book in case the upgrade doesn't clear...
|
Originally Posted by skipmnyc
(Post 9063763)
I would love to see CO jettison the 735 from its fleet entirely. I cannot figure out why they fly those planes from EWR to a market like MIA, I'm really sick of it. 8 seats (2 rows) in FC, and the "bulkhead" is a weird fabric-y contraption, so the second row of FC reclines into the first row of coach. Pitiful.
|
Forgive me if this is common knowledge, but what aircraft is the chosen replacement for the 737-500?
|
Originally Posted by vatraveler
(Post 9072370)
Forgive me if this is common knowledge, but what aircraft is the chosen replacement for the 737-500?
Routes that are on 737-500 may be upgraded to the 737-300 and 737-700, while those may be replaced by 738 and so on. |
Well some of the 735s are leaving the fleet. But it will be quite some time (years) before the 735s are all gone. There's just too many of them, and the number of 735s being retired is smaller than the number of 738s and 739-ERs being delivered.
|
Originally Posted by ssullivan
(Post 9073059)
Well some of the 735s are leaving the fleet. But it will be quite some time (years) before the 735s are all gone. There's just too many of them, and the number of 735s being retired is smaller than the number of 738s and 739-ERs being delivered.
|
Originally Posted by Hartmann
(Post 9073126)
Come on baby, 735 on IAH-LBB ^
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 9073159)
That would just spoil the entire experience that is flying into LBB. An agonizing hour in an ERJ without free alcohol is the proper way to prepare oneself for time there. :p
|
LOL.... If they upgrade service into LBB I may just have to try it out to see what it is like to fly into and outta LBB on a big plane. While I may have left LBB I am now flying outta of either TUL or OKC and have to wake up real early or leave late to experience the big planes. Funny thing is that the planes and the departure times between these two cities are about the same so the price is the determining factor. Fly on 737-500. :)
|
Originally Posted by rkkwan
(Post 9072390)
CO is taking new deliveries of 737-800 and 737-900ER for its domestic mainline service, and taking the 737-500 out. They are not direct replacement, but to renew the fleet and increase the average number of seats per aircraft.
Routes that are on 737-500 may be upgraded to the 737-300 and 737-700, while those may be replaced by 738 and so on. Also, while the 733 is larger than the 735, I'm not quite sure I would call that an "upgrade." Remember the 733 is the oldest plane in the CO fleet, and the oldest a/c operating (N16301) is now nearly 23 years old. |
Originally Posted by TWA Fan 1
(Post 9073743)
You are almost certainly right but please note that the 737-700 is one of the longest range 737's (with the 739ER) and will likely continue to serve the longer haul 737 routes (such as EWR to northern South America).
Also, while the 733 is larger than the 735, I'm not quite sure I would call that an "upgrade." Remember the 733 is the oldest plane in the CO fleet, and the oldest a/c operating (N16301) is now nearly 23 years old. |
Based on the retirement and winglet schedules, it seems like the 733 will be retiring faster as the 738/739ER's come online. The 735's will probably be in the fleet until either CO mainline renegotiates so that CO can get some EMB-190 class ships, or Boeing comes out with their 737 replacement with a ~110 seat version.
|
Deleted (Dupe)
|
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
(Post 9073159)
That would just spoil the entire experience that is flying into LBB. An agonizing hour in an ERJ without free alcohol is the proper way to prepare oneself for time there. :p
Agony is taking one of the Chautauqua CRJ flights on that route. |
Originally Posted by Scott6067
(Post 9073593)
LOL.... If they upgrade service into LBB I may just have to try it out to see what it is like to fly into and outta LBB on a big plane.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:13 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.