FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger-488/)
-   -   Acy (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger/696038-acy.html)

EddieG May 22, 2007 6:32 pm

Acy
 
Does anyone know why CO left ACY and is there any chance of them coming back considering traffic is up by 30% and EWR needs some refief (Not that ACY will do much)

njshawn May 22, 2007 8:23 pm


Originally Posted by EddieG (Post 7781484)
Does anyone know why CO left ACY and is there any chance of them coming back considering traffic is up by 30% and EWR needs some refief (Not that ACY will do much)


I am not sure they have room but Continental could do a good business at ACY. I know many people south of exit 109 like me that would much rather go to ACY then EWR. I like EWR it's just the hold ups taking off and landing are getting very old.

dmbfan222 May 22, 2007 8:34 pm


Originally Posted by njshawn (Post 7782065)
I am not sure they have room but Continental could do a good business at ACY. I know many people south of exit 109 like me that would much rather go to ACY then EWR. I like EWR it's just the hold ups taking off and landing are getting very old.

I definitely agree. The question is would people be willing to go some places through ACY->CLE rather than straight from EWR?

sbm12 May 22, 2007 8:39 pm

ACY is going to mostly pull from PHL traffic, and from EWR traffic to a lesser extent. CO won't fly there for the same reason that they don't fly to TTN. Based on where they'd be going (CLE and IAH as a VERY remote possibility) they figure their pax are more likely to go via EWR or just deal with the connection that they'll have out of PHL anyways. For the folks who who raather fly out of ACY than EWR, PHL is the other option that CO makes available. I doubt that CO is losing all that much business by not having service there.

IAH_FLYER May 22, 2007 8:45 pm

ACY= Atlantic City, before anyone (FCTSTY) asks.

SkiUtah May 22, 2007 9:07 pm

CO in ACY had everything against them.

To start the flights were at terrible times. They were not convenient for weekend AC trips and made for some long connection times.

Also the fligts were rediculously over priced. If you wanted to go to Atlantic city from cleveland it was like three to five times more than going to vegas. seriously. the prices were insane. This made the flights only connecting passengers in CLE didnt give any chance for O&D on the route. If continental had tried with more convenient times and cheaper fares they would have succeeded in ACY. I think the boost 30% you say is that DL has had great success in ACY even adding service to MCO non-stop and the area is growing. DL has much much more resonable fares out of ACY than continental had and much better timed flights actually giving the routes a chance to succeed.

another thing i think why DL has done so well in ACY and CO failed was that CO operated to the very small and limited CLE hub as DL is operating service to its super hub in ATL. DL actually cancelled the CVG flights and changed them to ATL and mco flights.

also i think TTN would be better for CO than ACY. Northern NJ is just full of CO FFs and looking for an alternate to EWR. I would definitly try TTN over newarks hours of delays sitting on the runway sometimes. ACY is not a real alternative to EWR and is a completely different market as it is far away and is really more of an alternate to PHL than it is to EWR. In the summer too it is way too far away with all that parkway traffic to be an alternate. I think CO would be fantastic in TTN and could survive in ACY if they tried with cheaper fares and well timed flights as people in south jersey need an airport as the recent passenger numbers are showing

Weatherboy May 22, 2007 9:09 pm

Acy/ttn
 
I think CO would more likely bring service to ACY than they would TTN.

After all, DL is currently servicing TTN now.

I'd rather see CO expand PHL operations before exploring ACY (or TTN) routes.

SkiUtah May 22, 2007 9:22 pm

TTN would simply be to please FFs in northern NJ with a less crowded, closer to your house alternate such as how CO serves multiple houston airports and how UA flys out of carlsbad california and AA services DAL etc etc. I agree with you though since DL seems to be doing well out of TTN no reason to put this on the priority list, but as EWR delays are getting worse and awful it is something that in the future might be a big hit to please high revenue FFs

puddy May 23, 2007 9:48 am


Originally Posted by SkiUtah (Post 7782338)
TTN would simply be to please FFs in northern NJ with a less crowded, closer to your house alternate such as how CO serves multiple houston airports and how UA flys out of carlsbad california and AA services DAL etc etc. I agree with you though since DL seems to be doing well out of TTN no reason to put this on the priority list, but as EWR delays are getting worse and awful it is something that in the future might be a big hit to please high revenue FFs

From what I can gather, only the TTN-BOS flights are doing well. It seems that they have discontinued the TTN-ATL flight as of June 7. Two flights show up in Delta's flight schedule after June 7 but no frequency is listed. I could only book a TTN-ATL flight by making a connection in BOS. Someone on the Delta board said the last ATL flight he was on had 5 passengers. V

Very disappointing. I was hoping to fly from there in June. But, I do believe the Boston flights are doing well. They seem close to full when I have done some spot checking.

crnk May 23, 2007 11:21 am


Originally Posted by SkiUtah (Post 7782338)
TTN would simply be to please FFs in northern NJ with a less crowded, closer to your house alternate such as how CO serves multiple houston airports and how UA flys out of carlsbad california and AA services DAL etc etc.

CO doesn't fly to HOU. They only offer service to IAH. However, they offer IAH service to EWR, JFK, and LGA. However, DL does service both IAH and HOU, but I'd bet HOU is limited to ATL service and not SLC....at least I've never seen HOU-SLC service all the times I have looked.

STT757 May 23, 2007 2:53 pm

There are plenty of CO FF's im Monmouth and Ocean County who would travel to ACY, 3 daily ERJ's to CLE from ACY and 3 daily DH-8-200s from TTN also to CLE.

It would give CO fliers another option.

Hartmann May 23, 2007 3:14 pm


Originally Posted by crnk (Post 7786252)
CO doesn't fly to HOU. They only offer service to IAH. However, they offer IAH service to EWR, JFK, and LGA. However, DL does service both IAH and HOU, but I'd bet HOU is limited to ATL service and not SLC....at least I've never seen HOU-SLC service all the times I have looked.

AA services both IAH and HOU as well (with HOU flights going to DFW only).

fly co to see the yanks May 23, 2007 4:00 pm


Originally Posted by STT757 (Post 7787769)
There are plenty of CO FF's im Monmouth and Ocean County who would travel to ACY

i think that's the point. would continental (CO) simply cannibilize their newark (EWR) business by offering atlantic city (ACY) flights?

PhillyPhlyer40 May 23, 2007 6:17 pm


Originally Posted by Weatherboy (Post 7782276)

I'd rather see CO expand PHL operations before exploring ACY (or TTN) routes.

Wonder WHY they got rid of PHL-EWR :td: :td: :td:

KENNECTED May 23, 2007 7:19 pm


Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40 (Post 7788662)
Wonder WHY they got rid of PHL-EWR :td: :td: :td:


Most likely because its more convenient and cheaper for consumers to take Amtrak or New Jersey transit to Philly than take a plane.

That route was probably expense to run and not profitable.

New York City Flyer May 23, 2007 7:36 pm


Originally Posted by Cheap Elite (Post 7788888)

Most likely because its more convenient and cheaper for consumers to take Amtrak or New Jersey transit to Philly than take a plane.

That route was probably expense to run and not profitable.

Not to mention anything that can be done to reduce congestion at Newark is important. Why further clog your airspace with little planes to Philadelphia when you can partner with Amtrak and build a station at Newark Airport. Smart move on Continental's part there.

I was waiting for somebody to say, "why would Continental canibalize their Newark hub" with flights at Atlantic City, Trenton, and elsewhere. Glad to see I wasn't the only one thinking about that. Continental wants to drive traffic to Newark and strengthen the hub, not weaken it.

fly co to see the yanks May 23, 2007 9:02 pm


Originally Posted by New York City Flyer (Post 7788989)
I was waiting for somebody to say, "why would Continental canibalize their Newark hub" with flights at Atlantic City, Trenton, and elsewhere. Glad to see I wasn't the only one thinking about that. Continental wants to drive traffic to Newark and strengthen the hub, not weaken it.

that someone was me. ;)

New York City Flyer May 24, 2007 6:26 am


Originally Posted by fly co to see the yanks (Post 7789388)
that someone was me. ;)

Yes, you and I must have been awake that day in Business School class. :) :cool:

HobokenFlyer May 24, 2007 6:29 am

ooohhhhhh...fight....FIGHT!!!!

I don't know, them fightin' words in my neighborhood... ^ ^ ^ :D

KENNECTED May 24, 2007 6:51 am


Originally Posted by New York City Flyer (Post 7788989)
Not to mention anything that can be done to reduce congestion at Newark is important. Why further clog your airspace with little planes to Philadelphia when you can partner with Amtrak and build a station at Newark Airport. Smart move on Continental's part there.

I was waiting for somebody to say, "why would Continental canibalize their Newark hub" with flights at Atlantic City, Trenton, and elsewhere. Glad to see I wasn't the only one thinking about that. Continental wants to drive traffic to Newark and strengthen the hub, not weaken it.

Also, as someone else stated it makes more sense to have connections to Cleveland for those who don't want to drive as Newark and deal with potential delays let alone the drive to Newark.

Xyzzy May 24, 2007 7:00 am


Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40 (Post 7788662)
Wonder WHY they got rid of PHL-EWR :td: :td: :td:

I'm sure that the abysmal on-time performance had something to do with it. I was ticketed on CO2344 a few times and never actually took it due to delays and cancellations. When things got bad at EWR that was one of the first flights to get canceled. Unfortunately, many of the pax with BF connections to Europe were stuck for a day as by the time they were at PHL it was too late to get onto Amtrak and make it to EWR for their flights.

SkiUtah May 24, 2007 11:21 am


Originally Posted by New York City Flyer (Post 7790936)
Yes, you and I must have been awake that day in Business School class. :) :cool:

A few RJs flying out of ACY and TNN is not really canabalizing. it would not even put a dent in CO huge EWR operation

Thats why best case scenario CO can connect a few people who want an easy to use airport thru CLE, strengthen that hub, and also fill those seats people would have taken out of EWR. There is a potential to make even more money here but i think it would just be a nice gesture for CO to offer this as an alternateto EWRs irritating and often delays. DL offering service though to both makes it alot less likely for the service to ever come back or start :(

airzim May 24, 2007 12:47 pm

I think an expansion of US Helicopter from ACY and/or Trenton to the Wall Street Heliport to feed the morning and evening departures to both EWR and JFK.

The service could be cross subsidized by New Yorkers going to the Borgata. Plus give flexability of access to JFK and EWR with a quick connect at Wall Street.

It will never happen but it's an idea.

mbreuer May 24, 2007 12:56 pm

Another central NJ vote for ACY (not that it matters). Depending on cost, ACY might provide a phl alternative... some might pay a premium vs. PHL where CO competes with WN.

dmbfan222 May 24, 2007 1:31 pm


Originally Posted by airzim (Post 7793182)
I think an expansion of US Helicopter from ACY and/or Trenton to the Wall Street Heliport to feed the morning and evening departures to both EWR and JFK.

The service could be cross subsidized by New Yorkers going to the Borgata. Plus give flexability of access to JFK and EWR with a quick connect at Wall Street.

It will never happen but it's an idea.


I was just thinking the same thing a couple of weeks ago while I was stuck in traffic driving back from AC to Northern NJ. I think a NYC->AC helicopter would do well. Didn't Trump have one for a while?

KENNECTED May 24, 2007 2:18 pm


Originally Posted by mbreuer (Post 7793228)
Another central NJ vote for ACY (not that it matters). Depending on cost, ACY might provide a phl alternative... some might pay a premium vs. PHL where CO competes with WN.

Don't you mean US Air? Or am I missing something?

New York City Flyer May 24, 2007 2:32 pm


Originally Posted by Cheap Elite (Post 7793763)
Don't you mean US Air? Or am I missing something?

With everything going on with US Airways right now, every week its another "hiccup," this week its the pilot seniority list, I don't think anybody really thinks of US as a long-term major competitor, I think Southwest is the bigger concern / threat. Sure, US can sell some cheap fares, but will the high-yield pax continue to put up with another new inconvenience every week, for how long?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:36 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.