FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger-488/)
-   -   HoKeY Question (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger/42571-hokey-question.html)

LGA_UAL Apr 14, 2002 4:15 pm

HoKeY Question
 
I recently booked a ticket on CO to MEX in H and K. When I called to upgrade the agent said that this ticket was non-upgradable. I do not fly CO much but from what I have read here I thought all H,K,Y fares were upgradable?

UpgradeMe Apr 14, 2002 4:22 pm

HoKeY doesn't apply on flights to Mexico.

Assuming that your fare is published, I can't think of any reason the fare would not be upgradeable. Any chance there were simply no upgrades available?

LGA_UAL Apr 14, 2002 4:24 pm

Nope. The agent explicitly said that this fare basis was non-upgradable.

snake Apr 14, 2002 6:28 pm

Did ya call back and ask another agent?

LGA_UAL Apr 15, 2002 4:00 pm

I called back and the agent said it was non-upgradable because it was a holiday fare. However, last week, the agent I booked it with said "of course it is upgradable, it is booked in H and K." Do I have any recourse, or am I stuck in Y?

B747-437B Apr 16, 2002 12:51 am

Agents are clueless about Mexico upgrades. I called 3 times in December to ask and received answers ranging from "Mexico is only served by one class aircraft", "Mexican Government rules dont allow mileage upgrades" and "South America (sic) requires HoKeY".

tvx Apr 16, 2002 7:28 am

Yep, got an automatic upgrade for myself and my wife on my last trip to CZM-IAH. No problem--My wife even got her upgrade at the 3 day gold window (on a separate itinerary).

As I understand it, if automatic upgrades are available, the tix are upgradeable in general.

[This message has been edited by tvx (edited 04-16-2002).]

thesilb Apr 16, 2002 9:02 am

Definitely upgradeable. Get new agent or call we-care.

UA*AA Apr 16, 2002 2:51 pm

wrong thread

[This message has been edited by UA*AA (edited 04-16-2002).]

LGA_UAL Apr 16, 2002 6:29 pm

I called WeCare and the CSR said that the fare was defiantly NOT upgradable but she added a note to my record allowing me to change my dates/time in order to find a non-holiday fare without a change fee.

ResAgent86 Apr 16, 2002 9:20 pm

I work at CO in reservations. The KHY requirement only applies in the BusinessFirst cabin (a plane which has a J class of service). Other markets such as Mexico, San Juan or Caracas go by the fare rules. Some K fares are not upgradeable, and you would only know this by reading the "rule conditions" portion of the fare rules.

Generally, if you got a good price on a Latin or Caribbean plane with a "Business" class cabin, it is likely not upgradeable.

Old Gold Apr 18, 2002 10:06 pm

ResAgent86 I appreciate your information and input, you wrote:

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Generally, if you got a good price on a Latin or Caribbean plane with a "Business" class cabin, it is likely not upgradeable.</font>
I was looking to buy a couple of TUS-SJU tickets and upgrade with OnePass miles. The lowest fare is offered by AA, in the $600's, CO's lowest fare is over $1,000, the "International" segment is a "K" fare and includes the restriction:

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">OTHER CONDITIONS ...........
2. ONEPASS AWARDS OTHER ONEPASS PROMOTIONAL OFFERS OR OTHER CO MARKETING PROGRAMS MAY NOT BE APPLIED FOR TRAVEL ON FARES GOVERNED BY THIS RULE.</font>
What's going on in Houston? Why would I want to consider to fly CO under the circumstances?

EWR-COflyer Apr 18, 2002 10:32 pm

Old Gold: unless I'm mistaken, SJU routes from IAH are flown on a 738. Therefore there's no BizClass, only FirstClass. I always thought you could u/g a trip to SJU for 15k miles (17.5k?) one-way from any fare. I would assume that EUA might run (ha ha) on those flights too...

FWIW There is no (J) on IAH-SJU: C0 D0 Z0 E0.

thesilb Apr 19, 2002 9:04 am

The simple fact is Continental pricing in many markets is just not competitive any longer. I see this more and more, all the time now. It used to be "a little" higher, but CO fares in many markets are so very much higher now that I have to actually select other airlines. And, like you Old Gold, I'm an infinite elite, so its not an easy choice to swtich off Continental. But I cannot pay 1.5-3x the lowest available rate just to fly on Continental.

Old Gold Apr 19, 2002 9:49 am

EWR-COflyer: You're right, the plane is a 738, but the printed rules, if I'm interperting them correctly, rule out OnePass mileage upgrades.

It's a vacation trip with the wife, so I don't want to play EUA-Companion upgrade roulette.

Why would I want to pay almost twice as much as the AA fare to fly CO on a fare that won't allow me to burn my OnePass miles to upgrade????....To earn more OnePass miles????? Gimmie a break! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/rolleyes.gif

venk Apr 19, 2002 10:25 am

One thing to consider in the real world. Often on certain routes, an airline has a regular clientale that fills up a significant capacity on that route at fairly low prices. Examples are corporate arrangements where one or more corporate clients can have regular "commute" traffic between the two locations. For example, IBM employees can apparently fly RDU-LGA on AA for less than $60 R/T with no Sat night stayover or advance booking requirements. IBM employees take up a lot of seats on such a route.

The other example is of travel/tour consolidators that get a bloc of seats.

Any airline that has such an arrangement is not really trying to compete with the others who may not have such arrangements in those routes. In other words, their lower priced fares are already "sold out". Unless they have a lot of empty seats available there is no need to reduce the price for such routes.

JonNYC Apr 19, 2002 11:29 am


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by venk:
One thing to consider in the real world. Often on certain routes, an airline has a regular clientale that fills up a significant capacity on that route at fairly low prices. Examples are corporate arrangements where one or more corporate clients can have regular "commute" traffic between the two locations. For example, IBM employees can apparently fly RDU-LGA on AA for less than $60 R/T with no Sat night stayover or advance booking requirements. IBM employees take up a lot of seats on such a route.

The other example is of travel/tour consolidators that get a bloc of seats.

Any airline that has such an arrangement is not really trying to compete with the others who may not have such arrangements in those routes. In other words, their lower priced fares are already "sold out". Unless they have a lot of empty seats available there is no need to reduce the price for such routes.
</font>
Well that's true, certainly, and bully for them if that's the case.

But that would seem to only amplify Old Gold's point-- why pay more to get less?

venk Apr 19, 2002 11:40 am

I agree Jon. Just wanted to point out that this may not be an endemic problem with CO in not wanting to be competitive. All airlines are non-competitive in specific routes.

CO has a lot of arrogance but this pricing is not necessarily a sign of such.

Old Gold Apr 19, 2002 11:54 am

I think that in the case I've illustrated there are two seperate issues.

The first is the non-competitive fare, we're looking at a mid-week departure, too.

The second issue is the inability to use OnPass mileage to upgrade on a fare that is obviously not a competitive match.

tvx Apr 19, 2002 12:28 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by thesilb:
The simple fact is Continental pricing in many markets is just not competitive any longer. I see this more and more, all the time now. It used to be "a little" higher, but CO fares in many markets are so very much higher now that I have to actually select other airlines. And, like you Old Gold, I'm an infinite elite, so its not an easy choice to swtich off Continental. But I cannot pay 1.5-3x the lowest available rate just to fly on Continental.</font>
Just thought I'd ask if you ran the flights on all the sites available. I usually try several sites several time before I book anything. I've seen fares change 3 times a day and gotten three different fares on three sites. I can usually beat my employer's contract quote (on another airline) on CO if I try hard enough.

Good hunting. . .



[This message has been edited by tvx (edited 04-19-2002).]

JonNYC Apr 19, 2002 12:34 pm


<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by venk:

CO has a lot of arrogance but this pricing is not necessarily a sign of such.
</font>
Agreed http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif


LGA_UAL Apr 19, 2002 2:28 pm

OG,

What website did you use to find that in the fare rules? I checked travelocity and ITN and neither of them displayed that line despite the fact that the agents said that this fare had that in there.

Old Gold Apr 19, 2002 3:28 pm

LGA_UAL: You have to use the CO website to find the upgrade restriction text, you won't find it on the rules displayed on ITN or Travelocity. It's displayed fairly close to the beginning of the fare rules.

If the fare's been changed you may not be able to find the rules for the fare basis you're ticketed in. I don't know of any way to pull up the rules for a ticket that has already been issued if the fare isn't still available. If that's the case you have to take their word for it.

p.s. Are you going to be around LGA on Thursday morning, by any chance?

[This message has been edited by Old Gold (edited 04-19-2002).]


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:18 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.