![]() |
Originally Posted by RealHJ
(Post 17749169)
BTW, 1h20m connection at CAN won't present a problem, going from domestic to int'l terminal?
And at PVG how far from domestic arrivals is the int'l terminal? As for PVG, CZ uses terminal 1 for both domestic and international flights. What I originally posted was that if any of your flights are on the same flight numbers, these transitions should be quite smooth. |
Originally Posted by RealHJ
(Post 17746303)
The last one is booked on a DL 006 ticket as NGO-CAN, 1h20m connection there, CAN-HKG.
But, I only found out later (after ticketing) that the NGO-CAN flight has 1 stop in PVG (I did think before, wow! how come that NGO-CAN flight is so very long? well, that is why!), which means in PVG it changes from international to domestic flight (though it's the same flt. #, CZ380, continuing on to CAN), so really it is NGO-PVG(~2h conn)-CAN(1h20m conn)-HKG. All on CZ, 9am depart - 6pm arrive same day, all on one DL 006 ticket. Re: the return (first paragraph), BTW, is HKG-PVG (MU tkt), 2 nights there (but a few hours less than 48 hours), then SHA-TSA (DL tkt). Both flights on MU, but on two different tickets (one MU, second DL) and PNRs.
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 17748050)
You'll be fine. Was that really the easiest way to get from Japan to Hong Kong? Wow!
Originally Posted by RealHJ
(Post 17749169)
With DL SlyMiles, yes, as DL then has blackout dates for CI (NGO-TPE-HKG would have been faster) - though CI flights are then bookable via other SkyTeam airlines (e.g. AF/KL can then book CI flights no problem), it's just that Delta chooses to block all CI flights at certain times, and MU has no availability, and CZ only "direct" flight NGO-CAN (CZ 380) is actually NGO-PVG-CAN, and CZ doesn't fly PVG-HKG unfortunately.
So, in short, yes, unfortunately.. :( A full day, 9am-6am, just to get NGO-HKG... BTW, 1h20m connection at CAN won't present a problem, going from domestic to int'l terminal? And at PVG how far from domestic arrivals is the int'l terminal? |
Originally Posted by RealHJ
(Post 17749169)
With DL SlyMiles, yes, as DL then has blackout dates for CI (NGO-TPE-HKG would have been faster) - though CI flights are then bookable via other SkyTeam airlines (e.g. AF/KL can then book CI flights no problem), it's just that Delta chooses to block all CI flights at certain times, and MU has no availability, and CZ only "direct" flight NGO-CAN (CZ 380) is actually NGO-PVG-CAN, and CZ doesn't fly PVG-HKG unfortunately.
So, in short, yes, unfortunately.. :( A full day, 9am-6am, just to get NGO-HKG... BTW, 1h20m connection at CAN won't present a problem, going from domestic to int'l terminal? And at PVG how far from domestic arrivals is the int'l terminal? |
Copy of past visa needed?
I am about to apply for a tourist visa and the NY consulate instructions indicate that applicants who've visited China previously include a photocopy of the most recent previous visa. My last trip was over twenty years and three passports ago. Needless to say, I cannot find the passport. From your experience, is it necessary to show an old visa?
If this topic has been covered in the past, my apologies. Thanks. MC |
I wouldn't worry about it since so much time has passed.
|
Originally Posted by ispflyer
(Post 17813760)
I am about to apply for a tourist visa and the NY consulate instructions indicate that applicants who've visited China previously include a photocopy of the most recent previous visa. My last trip was over twenty years and three passports ago. Needless to say, I cannot find the passport. From your experience, is it necessary to show an old visa?
If this topic has been covered in the past, my apologies. Thanks. MC However, I must warn you that the NY Consulate is a bit of a rogue operation and puts its own rules in place for applicants. Even though at most other missions in the USA, you'd get your 12-month multiple entry visa to which you are entitled (at the same price), NY will often only give out single- or double-entries. Especially if you don't have visas already in your current passport. If you will be needing to make multiple forays into China during the next year, I suggest that you reconsider using the NY Consulate (even though I see from profile you are in NY) and use a visa agent and ship your passport off to them with application. Chicago or Houston are both better Consulates that don't put additional burdens or restrictions on applicants, and contrary to popular belief, you can apply for a visa at any Chinese mission in the USA, not just the one designated for your region. No direct mail-in to any Chinese Consulate allowed anymore. |
To the experts:
I am trying to use our UA/CO miles to fly from Asia to US instead of using our AA miles, for biz class seats. Using AA miles would be so much easier as CX is a non-stop and quite easy to find availability when are a week to 10 days before departure. However We already have had redeemed a J/F r/t in November, and a F one-way departing in a few days, I feel the need to preserve our AA miles and start using other Alliances. DL redemption is a no go after seeing how convoluted others itineraries can become. I can live with the UA/CO redemption of 1 to 2 connections. Looking at CO booking engine - about 80% of the award seats involve CA going thru PEK, the remaining is on OZ thru ICN, with rare occasion I see NH is there going thru NRT. Leaving from BKK, even the TG flight is going thru PEK. It looks very obviously to me that in order to use CO miles, we would have to transit in China. My question is, do I need any Chinese Visa before hand for flying HKG/PEK/USA or HKG/PVG/USA? |
Originally Posted by jiejie
(Post 17813836)
Chicago or Houston are both better Consulates that don't put additional burdens or restrictions on applicants,
|
Originally Posted by jiejie
(Post 17813836)
However, I must warn you that the NY Consulate is a bit of a rogue operation and puts its own rules in place for applicants.
Thanks for the advice about the old visa and the warning about NY consulate. We were hoping to get the multiple entry visa, but don't have any actual plans for more trips. If we get it, great. If not, not a big deal. If I do go ahead and go in person to the NY Consulate, how long of a process (i.e. lines, etc) might I expect? |
Originally Posted by Happy
(Post 17814239)
To the experts:
I am trying to use our UA/CO miles to fly from Asia to US instead of using our AA miles, for biz class seats. Using AA miles would be so much easier as CX is a non-stop and quite easy to find availability when are a week to 10 days before departure. However We already have had redeemed a J/F r/t in November, and a F one-way departing in a few days, I feel the need to preserve our AA miles and start using other Alliances. DL redemption is a no go after seeing how convoluted others itineraries can become. I can live with the UA/CO redemption of 1 to 2 connections. Looking at CO booking engine - about 80% of the award seats involve CA going thru PEK, the remaining is on OZ thru ICN, with rare occasion I see NH is there going thru NRT. Leaving from BKK, even the TG flight is going thru PEK. It looks very obviously to me that in order to use CO miles, we would have to transit in China. My question is, do I need any Chinese Visa before hand for flying HKG/PEK/USA or HKG/PVG/USA? |
Originally Posted by Happy
(Post 17814239)
My question is, do I need any Chinese Visa before hand for flying HKG/PEK/USA or HKG/PVG/USA?
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 17814258)
Don't forget about DC, jiejie.
Originally Posted by ispflyer
(Post 17814653)
Thanks for the advice about the old visa and the warning about NY consulate. We were hoping to get the multiple entry visa, but don't have any actual plans for more trips. If we get it, great. If not, not a big deal. If I do go ahead and go in person to the NY Consulate, how long of a process (i.e. lines, etc) might I expect?
|
Originally Posted by jiejie
(Post 17816042)
While there normally aren't any special hassles or obstacles posed by DC Embassy, there seems to be a bit more variability in handing out the 12-month multiples vs the singles and doubles. Also the longer durations such as 90 days. On the latter two points, Chicago and Houston (and the west coast Consulates) seem to be more reliably cooperative.
|
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 17816136)
I was on board with you until you mentioned the "west coast". While I'm cool with Los Angeles, San Francisco is arguably even worse than New York. That having been said, after reading those recent tales about that embassy somewhere in Africa, I felt that we Americans have a pretty good deal... even if we have to pay more money for visas.
I do agree that despite the cost, once you get that 12-month multiple entry with 90 day durations, it's a lot better than most other nationalities who have to keep doing extensions and then run to HK for new visas, one or two entries and 30 days at a time. Over a year's time, Americans probably shell out less for Chinese visa purposes than others who need to make multiple visits. And bonus: we lucky USA passport holders get to do Mongolia border runs to re-activate another entry without need for Mongo visa! Let the Good Times Roll!.... One hasn't lived until they've done the border crossing visa run, stuffed in a jeep on top of millet sacks heading from Erlian to Zamyn Uud, with legs sticking out the window and 4 other people inside in similarly contorted positions. :p |
Originally Posted by moondog
(Post 17816136)
I was on board with you until you mentioned the "west coast". While I'm cool with Los Angeles, San Francisco is arguably even worse than New York. That having been said, after reading those recent tales about that embassy somewhere in Africa, I felt that we Americans have a pretty good deal... even if we have to pay more money for visas.
It's like China, everyone's got a reason why they need to cut... |
Originally Posted by mnredfox
(Post 17816781)
I can vouch that SF Consulate is a mad house. Not only is the line horrible, you get all the Chinese who think they have special rights cutting in line shouting to the employees "麻烦你,麻烦你".....
It's like China, everyone's got a reason why they need to cut... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:58 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.