I wouldn't challenge it either, if I were in their situation. Being in quarantine would prevent me from infecting my friends and family with the virus if I happen to have it and CDC has shown evidence that it may be transmissible while asymptomatic. Furthermore, if I happen to be patient zero in a transmission chain that happens to start a pandemic in the US, I will be persona non grata with my face plastered all over social media, ESPECIALLY if it turns out that I challenged the quarantine that could have prevented it.

Happened to see this with some background historical info. I thought it was interesting at least..

Coronavirus and the Constitution

Depending on how it's done, forced isolation and quarantine can make some public health threats worse than they would otherwise be.

Blind faith in government -- or even public health authorities -- is not without its risks. And skepticism directed at those in positions of privilege has a long history of being the necessary handmaiden for progress.

While surely we disagree on many things, this is one where I'm in complete agreement. In m view, regardless of whatever Admin/Party in power, always operate from the assumption that Gov't exists to serve itself first before those they govern.

Moderator's Note: Keep Political Arguments out of the TSS Policy Debate Forum!
 

Reminder!

Serious question: how are we supposed to know where the line is?

Are comparisons of different countries responses allowed vis their political stances and response/s? If a country *makes* it a political response (eg. if Boris Johnson or Trump ordered X or Y "Because Those Dirty Foreigners...") then is it up for discussion? What's the context and line, pls?