![]() |
NPR:
NBC News: DHS backup border funding plan would take millions from TSA, other agencies The funding from TSA includes $50 million planned for advanced screening equipment and $3 million collected from loose change left in trays at airports. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 31107794)
Sounds to me like another all-expenses-paid (by the taxpayer) summer vacay for favored employees.
Yeah....it would be a real cool place for a summer vacay for favored employees in such places as Douglas, Naco, and Nogales....... :rolleyes: |
I would see TSA screeners as a liability in that role.
|
Yes, I have been along the Arizona and New Mexico borders.
I know folks who would jump at a chance to do this: per diem, nowhere to spend money anyway, so suck up all the OT you can, it's not forever. It's like summer camp - yeah, it's hot (without the AC that these guys will get every chance they can), dusty and maybe buggy, but no kid wants to miss it - especially if your allowance piles up while you are away. The ordinary rules are relaxed, you're outside your normal management oversight, in fact, you're in a situation where oversight and accountability are going to be minimal at best - there will be people who want this. I've taken worse short-term assignments for long-term gain. |
While "deploying" employees to the border, TSA is also hiring 2000 more screeners to cover the summer rush. Allegedly, some have already been hired and trained. I would tend to believe that those already trained aren't increasing the staffing but are replacing screeners who have left the agency.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...s-rise-1468450 And TSA is planning to hire an additional 2,000 employees, including bag screeners, she said. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 31128496)
I know folks who would jump at a chance to do this: per diem, nowhere to spend money anyway, so suck up all the OT you can, it's not forever.
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 31128496)
The ordinary rules are relaxed, you're outside your normal management oversight, in fact, you're in a situation where oversight and accountability are going to be minimal at best - there will be people who want this.
|
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
(Post 31141650)
Funny..... EVERY CBP Agent I know has been pissed to get sent down here.... counted the days to get the hell out of here.....and asked not to come back....
Not sure who you heard that from but it's a complete cluster F' down here due to POTUS/his staff/Congress Critters, etc.....all being down here trying to "check things out." It’s not as popular as some CBP PreClearance assignments, but some people are fine with it at first anyway. |
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/imm...other-n1007961
The Department of Homeland Security is requesting $232 million from the Transportation Security Administration to fund border operations in the event that Congress does not agree to fund $1.1 billion of its funding request, according to documents of a contingency plan obtained by NBC News....TSA programs identified as funding sources include $50 million set aside to buy advanced airport screening equipment and $64 million from a worker’s compensation fund set aside for injured TSA employees in 2010. The funding also includes $3 million collected from lose change left in trays at airports. |
Im curious as to why folks are typing "deployment". That would imply the writer is suggesting this is somehow not deployment? (I'd hazard a guess that some feel only the military "deploys"...but the word means more than just that... I deployed a parachute many, many times...for instance...;))
P.S. Took a drive through southern AZ one Summer.... You couldn't pay ME enough to go work there....(And Im an Aussie...not exactly unfamiliar with heat!) |
Originally Posted by trooper
(Post 31144005)
Im curious as to why folks are typing "deployment". That would imply the writer is suggesting this is somehow not deployment? (I'd hazard a guess that some feel only the military "deploys"...but the word means more than just that... I deployed a parachute many, many times...for instance...;))
P.S. Took a drive through southern AZ one Summer.... You couldn't pay ME enough to go work there....(And Im an Aussie...not exactly unfamiliar with heat!) But it's a dry heat.:D |
Originally Posted by trooper
(Post 31144005)
Im curious as to why folks are typing "deployment". That would imply the writer is suggesting this is somehow not deployment? (I'd hazard a guess that some feel only the military "deploys"...but the word means more than just that... I deployed a parachute many, many times...for instance...;))
P.S. Took a drive through southern AZ one Summer.... You couldn't pay ME enough to go work there....(And Im an Aussie...not exactly unfamiliar with heat!) |
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
(Post 31141650)
Funny..... EVERY CBP Agent I know has been pissed to get sent down here.... counted the days to get the hell out of here.....and asked not to come back....
Not sure who you heard that from but it's a complete cluster F' down here due to POTUS/his staff/Congress Critters, etc.....all being down here trying to "check things out." I know that CBP officers are tasked to the breaking point and it is going to take more than repositioning workers from other agencies to resolve the problem. |
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 31145529)
I found it amusing that the TSA, which considers itself to be a military-like organization, used the word "deploy" to describe sending employees to the border. It becomes even more amusing when one learns that TSA is asking for volunteers to go to the border. TSA is sending individuals to the border, not organized units, which could perhaps be considered a "deployment."
Also, in many civilian career fields, DoD civil service employees can volunteer for deployment on an individual basis (and I know a number who have done so). |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 31145584)
My understanding was that almost all new hire CBP officers are stationed on the southern border. I'm sure there are exceptions..
They are tossing out huge bonus's if you take a focus city for a few years. AZ and CA wouldn't be that bad in the scheme of things..... if it was only for a few years. NM/Tex...? Screw that. There are some really, really, really outposts in those two states...... As for exceptions.... I know guys personally that have been on the Northern Border all their careers and got stuck down here on TDY for 90 days and were acting like crying kids..... Rumor has it that they are asking for CBP and Border Patrol Agents not along the boarder to come visit up to 90 days.....along with FAMS....before they start forcing the issue. What's next....VIPER Teams going to be sent down there...? LOL....LOL... |
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
(Post 31171910)
Use to be the case but now they are doing a lot more directed hiring (depending on the announcement). Bigger Cites are getting tossed in with Border towns to fill up their ranks.
They are tossing out huge bonus's if you take a focus city for a few years. AZ and CA wouldn't be that bad in the scheme of things..... if it was only for a few years. NM/Tex...? Screw that. There are some really, really, really outposts in those two states...... As for exceptions.... I know guys personally that have been on the Northern Border all their careers and got stuck down here on TDY for 90 days and were acting like crying kids..... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:08 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.