![]() |
Explosive Trace Detection
Can anybody interpret this ETD result:
|
I can't interpret but from my observation of TSA ETD practices at DFW yesterday I would suspect the validity of these tests. My bag was pulled for extra screening, the culprit was a ziplock with some candy and cheese crackers. The screener took a used ETD swab and sampled the ziplock bag all while wearing gloves that were potentially already contaminated. I observed the exact same process by a different screener checking a ladies toaster snacks except he tested each wrapped package.
I would at a minimum require the screener to test their gloves for contamination before testing a travelers property and I question reusing test swabs at all. Edit to add: Just a side note, all the concern over a bag of candy while my CPAP didn't get a seconds notice and my Kippy bag never came out of my bag. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 30015091)
I can't interpret but from my observation of TSA ETD practices at DFW yesterday I would suspect the validity of these tests. My bag was pulled for extra screening, the culprit was a ziplock with some candy and cheese crackers. The screener took a used ETD swab and sampled the ziplock bag all while wearing gloves that were potentially already contaminated. I observed the exact same process by a different screener checking a ladies toaster snacks except he tested each wrapped package.
I would at a minimum require the screener to test their gloves for contamination before testing a travelers property and I question reusing test swabs at all. |
If anything it shows that the TSA might want to upgrade its printers. This looks like a dot matrix printout from 1985.
|
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 30015016)
Can anybody interpret this ETD result:
That will be $211,235,386.26 please, TSA. TIA. |
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 30015116)
IF you have the presence of mind to do so, you should always require clean gloves and a clean swab before testing anything. Not always easy to do in the face of mass confusion at a checkpoint however.
|
I've only had them recheck a bag due to that once. My carry on bag had ripped in Amsterdam airport and I bought a new bag after security check airside. In Atlanta they said their machines showed explosive trace but couldn't find anything and seeing I had a receipt for buying the bag airside and the tags were still attached (nothing sharp in my hand luggage) they waved me off. I still haven't figured out how that bag could have been contaminated |
Looks a little like NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) where you get visible peaks at certain values on a spectrum of spin states.
Those peaks might correspond to nitrates, which are common in explosives. Also in food preservatives. Given that only around 1 set of luggage in 50 million is packed with explosives I think the whole charade is mostly for psychological effect. |
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/305180/
TSA TO THE RESCUE: It was reported this week that a TSA agent in Austin missed a passenger’s loaded gun. On the other hand, yesterday TSA agents took great pains to chemically analyze the small bag of kitty litter I had packed for the kitten I was transporting. |
Originally Posted by KDS
(Post 30101056)
<a href="https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/305180/">https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/305180/</a><br /><br /><br /><br />Sigh......grrrrrrr......
Wonder how long it will take before the TSA Blog lists the miss like they do the finds? TSA officer at Texas airport missed loaded gun, according to police reports |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 30102094)
|
Originally Posted by YadiMolina
(Post 30113134)
Interesting, and admirable, reaction by the passenger. If that were to happen to me (I own no firearms), I casually leave the secure area and deal with it elsewhere.
|
Originally Posted by YadiMolina
(Post 30113134)
Interesting, and admirable, reaction by the passenger. If that were to happen to me (I own no firearms), I casually leave the secure area and deal with it elsewhere.
It was interesting that they fired the clerk instantly while sexual assaulters go unpunished. I guess he got fired for embarrassing the TSA. |
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 30117511)
I don't know why people feel the need to self-incriminate when they make it through a TSA checkpoint with something? The simplest thing would have been for the guy to leave the secure area, go back to his car, hide the gun somewhere inside, and go through security again. Now, he runs the risk of a punitive TSA administrative fine. But, the good news is that it got a TSA clerk fired.
It was interesting that they fired the clerk instantly while sexual assaulters go unpunished. I guess he got fired for embarrassing the TSA. |
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 30117511)
I don't know why people feel the need to self-incriminate when they make it through a TSA checkpoint with something? The simplest thing would have been for the guy to leave the secure area, go back to his car, hide the gun somewhere inside, and go through security again. Now, he runs the risk of a punitive TSA administrative fine. But, the good news is that it got a TSA clerk fired.
It was interesting that they fired the clerk instantly while sexual assaulters go unpunished. I guess he got fired for embarrassing the TSA. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.