![]() |
Diminished mental capacity not Pre eligible
Question #6 of the TSA PreCheck application apparently asks if the applicant is mentally diminished in any way.
The legal guardians of a 19-year-old with diminished mental capacity have been told he'll likely get turned down. What next? Mandatory crotch grope for all infants? Secondaries for all toddlers? Because in TSA's eyes, diminished mental capacity = crazed psycho? |
How is that quantified?
Back when I was caregiving, we used ADL's as one quantifier. Can the person dress themselves, feed themselves, toilet themselves, etc.? If otherwise physically able, does the person have mental capacity for self-care, or are they dependent? At TSA pre, that could be the ability to comprehend and follow direction from TSA staff independently, as well as comprehend the passenger's responsibilities as part of the Pre program, in exchange for potentially expedited processing. They deal with diminished mental capacity every day and apparently someone decided to make it a question for Pre. If the guardians of the 19YO lied on the application, in real life if they're with their charge then I seriously doubt TSA on the ground would care. Push 'em through and next. Should they lie? IDK, the government seems to be going more and more sideways and I can't really say 'no' with strong conviction anymore. :( |
Originally Posted by camachinist
(Post 26679832)
How is that quantified?
Back when I was caregiving, we used ADL's as one quantifier. Can the person dress themselves, feed themselves, toilet themselves, etc.? If otherwise physically able, does the person have mental capacity for self-care, or are they dependent? At TSA pre, that could be the ability to comprehend and follow direction from TSA staff independently, as well as comprehend the passenger's responsibilities as part of the Pre program, in exchange for potentially expedited processing. They deal with diminished mental capacity every day and apparently someone decided to make it a question for Pre. If the guardians of the 19YO lied on the application, in real life if they're with their charge then I seriously doubt TSA on the ground would care. Push 'em through and next. Should they lie? IDK, the government seems to be going more and more sideways and I can't really say 'no' with strong conviction anymore. :( The question is stupid and pointless and only disenfranchises decent people, just as it is doing here. How is it relevant to aviation safety? |
Here's a link to the thread on @AskTSA where the question arose:
https://twitter.com/AskTSA/status/735217810851409920 |
The qualification criteria for precheck are vety questionable. I read an article the other day that a woman was denied - She is a CEO - because 25 years ago she stoled a $25 necklace.
Precheck logic: petty theft 25 years ago = you want to commit murder/suicide Convicted terrorist and 2nd degree murderer = Precheck (Sarah Jane Olson) |
Seems like an ADA violation.
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 26679875)
They would be fools to lie and they know it.
The question is stupid and pointless and only disenfranchises decent people, just as it is doing here. How is it relevant to aviation safety? |
Originally Posted by chgoeditor
(Post 26680337)
I'm not defending the application, but presumably the logic is that someone with diminished mental capacity might be vulnerable to outside influences, and persuaded to carry something nefarious onto a plane.
|
Originally Posted by chgoeditor
(Post 26680337)
I'm not defending the application, but presumably the logic is that someone with diminished mental capacity might be vulnerable to outside influences, and persuaded to carry something nefarious onto a plane.
|
Originally Posted by chgoeditor
(Post 26680337)
I'm not defending the application, but presumably the logic is that someone with diminished mental capacity might be vulnerable to outside influences, and persuaded to carry something nefarious onto a plane.
I wonder if this disqualifies vets who have been diagnosed with PTSD? |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 26680645)
I wonder if this disqualifies vets who have been diagnosed with PTSD?
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 26680322)
Seems like an ADA violation.
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 26680645)
OK, but by that 'logic', no infants or very young children should be allowed Pre access, because their limited mental capacities mean they might be used by someone with nefarious intent.
I wonder if this disqualifies vets who have been diagnosed with PTSD? |
Originally Posted by Often1
(Post 26680749)
How would the ADA apply?
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in employment, transportation, public accommodation, communications, and governmental activities. |
Originally Posted by chgoeditor
(Post 26680337)
I'm not defending the application, but presumably the logic is that someone with diminished mental capacity might be vulnerable to outside influences, and persuaded to carry something nefarious onto a plane.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.