![]() |
Newark Security SHUT DOWN - Security Breach
Confirmed via person at Newark and breaking news update on ABC at 11 AM.
|
Happens all the time. ESP in EWR & LAX
|
Newark website says:
Be advised, due to an incident occurring at Terminal C there will be flight delays. |
Newark Security SHUT DOWN - Security Breach
Just arrived from FLL. Airport is a mess. Flights arriving but not departing. Security shut down.
|
This is really silly. First of all, we need more competent TSA who are not distracted on the job, talking about when their shifts end and other jobs they're applying for.
Secondly, at mega-hubs like this, some kind of compartmentalization is needed, so that if/when a breach happens, you don't have to evacuate the entire planet and rescreen... |
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/08/...t-hours-apart/
After an extensive search, it was determined that the passenger left Newark for a flight to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, according to the TSA. |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19063558)
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/08/...t-hours-apart/
So does this mean the pax will be "questioned" when they arrive in CLE? ;) I thought there was a management shake-up not too long ago at EWR that was supposed to help TSA get it together. What is the problem with this airport? |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 19063590)
More likely everyone on the plane will have to undergo precautionary screening on arrival (including ID and BP, I'm sure) to ensure that the pax didn't hand something evil off to a fellow pax/conspirator. Pity the poor sod on that flight who somehow manages to lose his/her BP during the flight. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19063558)
So does this mean the pax will be "questioned" when they arrive in CLE? ;) |
Originally Posted by SomeGuy
(Post 19063657)
Pity the person who bought a bottle of water in Newark and still has it when they land in Cleveland.
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 19063590)
More likely everyone on the plane will have to undergo precautionary screening on arrival (including ID and BP, I'm sure) to ensure that the pax didn't hand something evil off to a fellow pax/conspirator. Pity the poor sod on that flight who somehow manages to lose his/her BP during the flight. :rolleyes:
I thought there was a management shake-up not too long ago at EWR that was supposed to help TSA get it together. What is the problem with this airport? |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19063726)
Or was flying in F and was given a bottle of water by one of the F/A's ;)
|
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19063558)
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/08/...t-hours-apart/
After an extensive search, it was determined that the passenger left Newark for a flight to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, according to the TSA. You can bet I will do it of I'm ever caught up in this idiocy. |
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 19064037)
We've discussed this many times: a passenger who is terminating at CLE and declines to be screened. This is a variation on the theme of returning from OCONUS at an airport with no way to exit except through the terminal and refusing screening.
You can bet I will do it of I'm ever caught up in this idiocy. |
UA flights EWR-CLE there is a 9:00AM flight, next flight 2:48PM unless the passenger was very early for the 2:48PM flight. I know this becuase I fly this route on a regular basis, last month missed the 9:00AM from a connection
and had to wait till 2:48PM. I did not mind that is I enjoy my time at EWR, expecially at the United Club. As far as TSA is concerned, how can this happen. Did you see how many TSA employees they have at checkpoints. Even the exit has 2 people ever since some walked through the exit last year. |
Originally Posted by buckeyefanflyer
(Post 19064155)
As far as TSA is concerned, how can this happen?
|
Just what does this mean? Like in English, please:
a passenger left a checkpoint without proper security screening. My second thought: The TSA lets someone walk away without completing screening and 1000's of people are affected? And, just how does someone just walk away? They clear me and I can walk around. They clear my stuff and I can pick it up if I have been cleared. This is only explained by pure incompetence. |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 19064282)
This is only explained by pure incompetence.
"THIS! IS! TSA!" |
Originally Posted by Bttc
(Post 19064049)
I'd love to see this. Bet you'd get arrested, but it would be worth it--they'd never be able to get a conviction in court(or even a DA to prosecute).
Back to the main topic, I was there for the infamous "guy walks through an unguarded exit lane" terminal dump at EWR 1.5 years ago. I was already on my airplane, with the door closed, ready to push back when they threw us out. It took close to 2 hours to evacuate the terminal, and a few more to get everyone back in. Thousands of innocent passengers were haphazardly herded through a narrowing corridor to the land-side of the terminal. If ever a terrorist wanted to attack a large group of people in a confined space, the TSA appeared inclined to hand them such a target...in the name of "security", of course. |
It was the second incident that day!
There was an earlier problem in the day. The BOMB SQUAD had to clear an oversized bag that hadn't been screened. They are out of their minds.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/201...al_locked.html "...In the earlier incident, which occurred at about 6:30 a.m., a large checked bag was sent on to be loaded on board an aircraft before being properly screened, said a statement released by TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis. Officials closed the oversized baggage screening until the bag was found at 7:19 a.m., and the oversized baggage area was reopened. The bomb quad cleared the bag at 9:25am..." |
Law enforcement sources told Fox 5 News what officials left out – that the woman had tested positive for residue of possible explosive material on her hands, and slipped away from the TSA before she could be thoroughly screened.
Read more: http://www.myfoxny.com/story/1919978...#ixzz22iCdrhvp Another story says it happened at 10, which doesn't make any sense if she was on the flight to Cleveland that would have already left. Then again not much of this makes much sense. |
duplicate post, sorry
|
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 19065170)
Law enforcement sources told Fox 5 News what officials left out – that the woman had tested positive for residue of possible explosive material on her hands, and slipped away from the TSA before she could be thoroughly screened.
|
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 19065170)
Law enforcement sources told Fox 5 News what officials left out – that the woman had tested positive for residue of possible explosive material on her hands, and slipped away from the TSA before she could be thoroughly screened.
|
Originally Posted by saulblum
(Post 19065277)
So what was the cost this morning of that false positive combined with TSOs' incompetence?
And when the cost of this world class lunacy runs $8B/year, this morning's antics are but a minor drop in the bucket. :mad: |
Originally Posted by NY-FLA
(Post 19065578)
Come now, our favorite TSA shill on these boards has maintained that these tests are "Highly accurate"... and simultaneously claims that he completely understands the concept of false positives, too. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
And when the cost of this world class lunacy runs $8B/year, this morning's antics are but a minor drop in the bucket. :mad: http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2...i_team_st.html I sure hope none of the adults reassured them with, "I know this is a pain, but in the end it's all for our safety, and we cannot take any chances these days." |
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 19065170)
Law enforcement sources told Fox 5 News what officials left out – that the woman had tested positive for residue of possible explosive material on her hands, and slipped away from the TSA before she could be thoroughly screened.
Read more: http://www.myfoxny.com/story/1919978...#ixzz22iCdrhvp Another story says it happened at 10, which doesn't make any sense if she was on the flight to Cleveland that would have already left. Then again not much of this makes much sense. |
How is someone able to walk away without completing the screening? Especially when that person alarms for explosives, which are the only real threat to a plane. I don't want guns or knives on my plane, but they aren't as much of a threat as a bomb. I have a feeling this woman had no idea anything was wrong and a TSA screener told her it was ok to go.
Why do incidents like this happen at EWR so often? Does the TSA just have a higher level of incompetence there? |
nj.com/The Star-Ledger update from this morning, I called it
Local officials of the Transportation Security Administration eventually concluded the woman had boarded a United Airlines flight to Cleveland. But the security agency only arrived at its conclusion after the flight had landed in Cleveland at 10:45 a.m., and authorities were never able to talk to the woman or identify her by name. "She walked out of the checkpoint area before the screening process was complete," Ann Davis, a TSA spokeswoman, said in a statement. "Management at Newark will conduct a comprehensive review of the incident and will take appropriate action." |
Originally Posted by spd476
(Post 19068405)
Why do incidents like this happen at EWR so often? Does the TSA just have a higher level of incompetence there?
|
Originally Posted by spd476
(Post 19068405)
How is someone able to walk away without completing the screening? Especially when that person alarms for explosives, which are the only real threat to a plane. I don't want guns or knives on my plane, but they aren't as much of a threat as a bomb.
|
If they were passing through security at 8:45 as they are now saying, and the flight leaves at 9, they were probably not thinking about anything but getting through this silly line and to the gate.
The flight left at 8:52 (eight minutes early) so I really don't possibly see how the 8:45 time makes any sense, though it was at C104, which is fairly close to security. They probably have no clue they caused any issue and she's probably telling people hey, I was on that flight, I wonder who it was? |
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 19069006)
nj.com/The Star-Ledger update from this morning, I called it
Local officials of the Transportation Security Administration eventually concluded the woman had boarded a United Airlines flight to Cleveland. But the security agency only arrived at its conclusion after the flight had landed in Cleveland at 10:45 a.m., and authorities were never able to talk to the woman or identify her by name. "She walked out of the checkpoint area before the screening process was complete," Ann Davis, a TSA spokeswoman, said in a statement. "Management at Newark will conduct a comprehensive review of the incident and will take appropriate action." "She walked out." It's all her fault. "She walked OUT!" At least they narrowed the culprit down to some woman going to Cleveland. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by golfguy714
(Post 19069298)
I would bet my farm that the person in question did not alarm for explosives!
|
Originally Posted by goldelite8
(Post 19062987)
Confirmed via person at Newark and breaking news update on ABC at 11 AM.
Better not do it again!
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 19064805)
"This is madness!"
"THIS! IS! TSA!"
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 19065943)
Last sentence bolding mine: Nor does "slipping away" after testing positive under ETD ;)
|
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 19070278)
Of course she didn't, but the TSA can't say "she tested positive for Jurgens".
|
Originally Posted by TheGolfWidow
(Post 19069987)
"She walked out." It's all her fault. "She walked OUT!"
At least they narrowed the culprit down to some woman going to Cleveland. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by FlyingHoustonian
(Post 19073001)
But, is Cleveland ok?...:D
|
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 19073232)
Yes, she is doing just fine and she doesn't have any problem during her flight.
|
One of the online news sites
Poll: Did TSA Overreact at Newark Airport? The choices are Did the TSA overreact Sunday when it delayed or canceled 165 flights at Newark Liberty? Yes. And they're incompetent, too, for letting a woman just walk away. Yes, but I don't blame them for losing the woman. No, we can't be too careful at our airports. Other (tell us is the comments). It's early, only 13 votes, but ten of them choose option 1, the rest choosing anything for security. |
FOXNY.com: TSA Adminstrator Pistole claims that Newark(EWR) has been improved
Here is some reporting from Fox 5 News Reporter Lisa Evers:
MYFOXNY.com: TSA chief: improvements made at Newark Airport Posted: Monday, September 17, 2012 10:11 PM EST Updated: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:58 AM EST A short quote: Fox 5 has obtained the official memo from the TSA regarding recent security breaches at Newark Liberty International Airport. The report details three security breaches over a 12-hour period at the airport last month. It also points out specific security changes that have been made at the airport since then. I wonder how much of the report was cut-and-pasted from this thread? :pIt was a travel nightmare in august many wanted to forget: 3 TSA security breaches and terminal shutdowns in a 12-hour period forced canceled flights, and even overnight delays. In one incident, a woman who tested positive for explosives residue was allowed to get on a plane and fly away unchecked. and"Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials at EWR have made substantial improvements to their screening operations to help prevent future security incidents," TSA Administrator John Pistole said in the memo. "EWR has improved and streamlined its processes in regard to remedial training and discipline of individuals involved in security incidents." The TSA said it has improved communications with Port Authority police and briefed all TSA shifts on the need to pay attention to detail. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:54 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.