![]() |
Originally Posted by tkey75
(Post 18351164)
If she fails at what is probably the simplest of tasks - make sure everyone walks in this direction, not that direction - how can she be trusted for something more challenging?
As for Sen. Lautenberg and his concerns about sterile area exits, perhaps he has stock or financial interests in a company that can install glass boxes to isolate exiting pax until the monitoring TSO hits a release button. For our safety, of course. :rolleyes: I wouldn't be surprised to see taxpayers funding over-priced one-person-wide exit lane restrictions in the future, to simplify the task of the monitoring TSO. |
Originally Posted by ralfp
(Post 18346780)
Don't they have alarms that go off when people enter through the exit?
But the presence of the motion-enforcing sensors (SAN has some also) still has to be backstopped by a human security presence. Or is it the sensors backstop the human? Either way, if a SINGLE screener without motion sensors as backup can be so easily distracted, then that layer of security is as penetrable as cheesecloth and might as well not exist. But shhhh, don't talk about it or else the bad guys might find out.
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 18351589)
I wouldn't be surprised to see taxpayers funding over-priced one-person-wide exit lane restrictions in the future, to simplify the task of the monitoring TSO.
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 18351589)
Maybe it would help TSOs who perform this function to stay awake and on task if they were required to ask each exiting pax to say his/her name. :rolleyes:
. |
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 18351589)
...
As for Sen. Lautenberg and his concerns about sterile area exits, perhaps he has stock or financial interests in a company that can install glass boxes to isolate exiting pax until the monitoring TSO hits a release button. For our safety, of course. :rolleyes:
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 18351589)
I wouldn't be surprised to see taxpayers funding over-priced one-person-wide exit lane restrictions in the future, to simplify the task of the monitoring TSO.
At MEM they appear to be reconfiguring the main checkpoint (leading into Terminal B, for those who care). They have put up a solid, floor-to-ceiling wall for an exit lane that is approximately 4-foot wide, probably enough for 2 people side-by-side to exit. There are generally 2 TSA employees standing on each end of this new hamster tunnel, for a total of 4, to control entrance and egress through the exit lane. It's effing insane. |
I'm sure she was just chit-chatting with another TSA employee, probably with a cup of hot, steaming coffee in her hand, ready to throw in the face of anyone who confronts her.
You wonder how many people walk past snoozing TSA workers each day and are not detected. |
Originally Posted by barbell
(Post 18352330)
There are generally 2 TSA employees standing on each end of this new hamster tunnel, for a total of 4, to control entrance and egress through the exit lane. It's effing insane.
It's no less stupid, though. |
I'm waiting for the day where we see a "Newark success thread."
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.