FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Candy shuts down checkpoint (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1296068-candy-shuts-down-checkpoint.html)

RichardKenner Dec 30, 2011 6:02 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 17716188)
I would disagree with that.

Flying a plane without booked passengers and then having to accommodate them on other flights is a flight operation.

No, I stand by my statement. flight operations refer solely to the motion of aircraft, not to what or who is on the aircraft. Moving a passenger from one flight to another when the departure time of neither flight is affected does not affect flight operations. Are you really claiming that if three passengers for a flight are in a single vehicle which has a flat tire and they have to be rebooked for a later flight that the flat has impacted "flight operations"?

Boggie Dog Dec 30, 2011 7:50 pm


Originally Posted by RichardKenner (Post 17718574)
No, I stand by my statement. flight operations refer solely to the motion of aircraft, not to what or who is on the aircraft. Moving a passenger from one flight to another when the departure time of neither flight is affected does not affect flight operations. Are you really claiming that if three passengers for a flight are in a single vehicle which has a flat tire and they have to be rebooked for a later flight that the flat has impacted "flight operations"?

The single solitary reason for a commercial passenger aircraft to be placed in motion is to move a passenger(s).

I understand that TSA is claiming that no flights were delayed or cancelled. That is very likely true in this case. If you want to limit your definition to this then that is perfectly alright but I am using a broader understanding of commercial passenger aircraft operations.

RichardKenner Dec 31, 2011 6:14 am


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 17719008)
The single solitary reason for a commercial passenger aircraft to be placed in motion is to move a passenger(s).

I don't want to keep beating a dead horse here, but the above is not at all true. Even leaving aside the issue of cargo, if there ends up with a situation where there are no passengers on a particular flight, the airline will more often than not have to operate the flight anyway to put the aircraft and crew in the proper position for a later flight.

InkUnderNails Dec 31, 2011 7:49 am

Despite the various definitions of the FAA, the airlines and the TSA the flight operations some passengers may have been significantly disrupted. The actual number remains unknown and may be trivial.

jtodd Dec 31, 2011 7:49 am

Did the bags, of the passengers that missed the flight, make the flight? Or were they pulled off of the aircraft?

cordelli Dec 31, 2011 8:20 am


Originally Posted by InkUnderNails (Post 17720826)
Despite the various definitions of the FAA, the airlines and the TSA the flight operations of the passengers were significantly disrupted.

Which flights and how many people? The only thing we know is a woman who showed up late missed her flight. The 12:05 flight already left when the terrorist candy was screened, and the next flight was the 12:35 American.

The flights leaving after the American flight the woman was late for were very close to 1, so those people probably made their flights. To me it would seem that only one flight, the 12:35 American flight had a possibility of being affected, though again arriving at security a half hour before flight time is really pushing it.

Everything relating to people missing flights is related to the quote from one woman who was late anyways and relaying what the airline supposedly told her.

Nobody else has confirmed there was any delay.

InkUnderNails Dec 31, 2011 10:21 am


Originally Posted by cordelli (Post 17720921)
Which flights and how many people? The only thing we know is a woman who showed up late missed her flight. The 12:05 flight already left when the terrorist candy was screened, and the next flight was the 12:35 American.

The flights leaving after the American flight the woman was late for were very close to 1, so those people probably made their flights. To me it would seem that only one flight, the 12:35 American flight had a possibility of being affected, though again arriving at security a half hour before flight time is really pushing it.

Everything relating to people missing flights is related to the quote from one woman who was late anyways and relaying what the airline supposedly told her.

Nobody else has confirmed there was any delay.

Very well, I withdraw my snarky comment, at least for now.

That does not relieve the TSA of an apparent overreaction in its procedure in this case.

As for the title of the thread, I am reminded each time I see it about a Candy I once met that could shut down more than a checkpoint, but that is a story best left untold.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:02 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.