![]() |
NoS Comming to SNA
So they've been building a new terminal (though all airside connected A-C) at SNA for about 2/3rds of forever, its finally almost there and walking back from gate 17 last night I was peeking over the paper covered glass to get a view of the new lobby and saw every checkpoint had a Rapidscan:td::mad:
|
Ugh. Not cool.:(
We fly international almost exclusively these days, so it's been a few years since we've flown SNA, but we sometimes fly out on domestic hops... can you say which airlines are to be served by the new terminal? |
Originally Posted by mr&mrs
(Post 17268779)
Ugh. Not cool.:(
We fly international almost exclusively these days, so it's been a few years since we've flown SNA, but we sometimes fly out on domestic hops... can you say which airlines are to be served by the new terminal? |
Originally Posted by ryan182
(Post 17268373)
So they've been building a new terminal (though all airside connected A-C) at SNA for about 2/3rds of forever, its finally almost there and walking back from gate 17 last night I was peeking over the paper covered glass to get a view of the new lobby and saw every checkpoint had a Rapidscan:td::mad:
|
Originally Posted by nachtnebel
(Post 17271808)
what a bunch of d*bags the TSA are. That was a nice airport, now useless. Oh well, just head over to LGB instead. What are they getting, L3 I hope.....
|
The round mostly transparent ones are the marginally less-bad millimetre wave (MMW); the boxy two-sided ones are the backscatter X-ray (BKSX).
|
Originally Posted by stifle
(Post 17272896)
The round mostly transparent ones are the marginally less-bad millimetre wave (MMW); the boxy two-sided ones are the backscatter X-ray (BKSX).
|
Originally Posted by nachtnebel
(Post 17274265)
If that makes a difference to folks.
|
Originally Posted by ryan182
(Post 17268950)
Though I'm not 100% space-wise if they could fit at A/B without some rearranging of things.
|
Originally Posted by whitearrow
(Post 17277068)
I really don't see how they could fit at A/B without a complete teardown and remodel of the entire screening areas. Those lines are single-file, narrow funnels that barely fit the WTMD and luggage x-ray.
Good riddance to TSA in SNA!!! :td::td::td::mad::mad: |
Originally Posted by whitearrow
(Post 17277068)
I really don't see how they could fit at A/B without a complete teardown and remodel of the entire screening areas. Those lines are single-file, narrow funnels that barely fit the WTMD and luggage x-ray.
|
They can't fit the technology right now at the current north or south screening checkpoints, but with the new one to open in a month or so, they can send lots of people down to the new one while they "upgrade" ( :rolleyes: ) the south checkpoint. Then close the north, send everyone to the south and new checkpoints, and "upgrade" ( :rolleyes: ) there.
The only possible savior would be money and space. They would have to take more area below in the baggage claim area for the electronics rooms, and I'm not sure SNA wants to give that up. Anyway, I believe Southwest is going to be the biggest user of the new gates and terminal, with UA and AA staying pretty much where they are. The new terminal opens November 14 (or so) and info can be found here. |
Or they'll just flat out lie (no, really) like I've seen them do several times at MSP. The main terminal there has 5 checkpoints available to passengers. Of those, 3 are completely NoS free. They will station employees to stand in front of the entrances to these obviously operational checkpoints and tell people that the lines at the NoS only checkpoints are faster. Of course, they slow the baggage screening at these NoS free checkpoints to a crawl so as to appear slower. The funny thing is, most people don't seem to buy it.
I would envision a similar situation at SNA where they stand in front of the entrances to A/B and aggressively direct people to the new concourse. It's how they roll. :td: |
Originally Posted by barbell
(Post 17282422)
Or they'll just flat out lie (no, really) like I've seen them do several times at MSP. The main terminal there has 5 checkpoints available to passengers. Of those, 3 are completely NoS free. They will station employees to stand in front of the entrances to these obviously operational checkpoints and tell people that the lines at the NoS only checkpoints are faster. Of course, they slow the baggage screening at these NoS free checkpoints to a crawl so as to appear slower. The funny thing is, most people don't seem to buy it.
I would envision a similar situation at SNA where they stand in front of the entrances to A/B and aggressively direct people to the new concourse. It's how they roll. :td: That said, I have to say I don't know if it is the lack of NoS machines or what, but the SNA TSA station is one of the best I've dealt with in the US lately. They work fast, are fairly nice, and move people through quickly. When something is wrong, or different, it clearly stands out. |
Originally Posted by ryan182
(Post 17268950)
Though I'm not 100% space-wise if they could fit at A/B without some rearranging of things.
My elderly mother who recently got the third degree at PHX was asking me why can't every airport be like SNA? She will be so disappointed she loves that place. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:24 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.