![]() |
I have a trip into MSP in October. I was not planning to go to the MOA, but I think I will plan to go now.
Just so I can cancel it. |
Originally Posted by sbagdon
(Post 17075683)
I'm really torn by this one.
MOA is a business, and not public space (by some definitions). They aren't a highway, or a park, or a beach (or at least public versions of those examples). And they can conduct their business any way they wish... just as any of my local malls, or gas stations, or grocery stores are businesses. If "security" for a business asked such follow-up questions (at a Best Buy, or a Home Depot, or wherever), at that point, I have the choice of conducting my business there... or not. On the other hand, these businesses also have to follow the law. If a private non-LEO security guard shared private information, and this sharing violated a law, I look forward to that business being litigated into debt or even bankruptcy. And it might also be the discovery process, to identify if private entities are permitted to treat their customers this way. I don't really care what MOA does. They won't get my business, but they're a private entity. But DHS is encouraging these actions (see something, say something). And the federal government is actively investigating people for such benign behavior as forgetting their cell phones or taking photos of a tourist attraction, instead of telling the overzealous, anxious people who work at MOA to go pound sand. |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 17077917)
I have a trip into MSP in October. I was not planning to go to the MOA, but I think I will plan to go now.
Just so I can cancel it. |
Originally Posted by Polar Man
(Post 17076081)
I am not particularly surprised there is a show on TLC called "Mall Cops". If follows the mall cops at MOA. From what I saw of it the few times I flipped through it seamed that they were pretty full of themselves.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sit...ps_422x218.jpg There's a notion, perpetuated by films and comic strips, that mall security personnel are the Barney Fifes of law enforcement, exercising serious police muscles over the most minor infractions. Now we get the lowdown. Here comes "Mall Cops: Mall of America," a half-hour reality series shot at Minnesota's famous and gigantic Mall of America and, well, that silly stereotype turns out to be pretty much the case. Ouch! :p |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 17077917)
I have a trip into MSP in October. I was not planning to go to the MOA, but I think I will plan to go now.
Just so I can cancel it. |
Well, they start questioning me for no reason and they may be getting a little note from my lawyer. Spouse works law enforcement, they have no right to question someone for no apparent reason. Steal a t-shirt yes, act suspicious yes, break the law yes. Shop in the mall? No.
|
Originally Posted by VelvetJones
(Post 17076222)
This is extremely dangerous in more ways than one. First off, this whole thing sounds like an end-around for the 4th amendment.
Federal government partnerships with the private sector have been taken on to do all sorts of evasion around restrictions or requirements placed on the federal government. Federal government partnerships with foreign governments or foreign corporations have been taken on to do all sorts of evasion around restrictions or requirements placed on the federal government. Federal government partnerships with domestic corporations or individuals have been taken on to do all sorts of evasion around restrictions or requirements placed on the federal government. Then there is what the federal government does itself by off-shoring/outsourcing personnel and/or activities. The federal government loves the "see something, say something" program -- it enables a more massive monitoring of even US persons who have violated no law and are unlikely to be lawfully subject to police authority under an applied standard of reasonable suspicion or probable cause applicable to LEOs well within the US. The MOA is but one of many places where this kind of thing is occurring. |
Originally Posted by oldpenny16
(Post 17075263)
Any company that does this sort of questioning, in this case Mall of America, deserves to loose customers.
|
Originally Posted by Geek007
(Post 17079682)
Well, they start questioning me for no reason and they may be getting a little note from my lawyer. Spouse works law enforcement, they have no right to question someone for no apparent reason. Steal a t-shirt yes, act suspicious yes, break the law yes. Shop in the mall? No.
|
Originally Posted by Dovster
(Post 17080089)
You would think that they would want to tighten the grip they have on customers.
|
Originally Posted by IslandBased
(Post 17080784)
Is the MOA still a major destination for foreign shoppers?
|
Originally Posted by IslandBased
(Post 17080784)
Is the MOA still a major destination for foreign shoppers?
Originally Posted by Dovster
(Post 17080827)
Personally, I would not sit in an aluminum tube for 16+ hours just to go to a mall, but if I was in MSP for some other reason I would probably stop in at the mall.
|
Originally Posted by IslandBased
(Post 17080784)
Is the MOA still a major destination for foreign shoppers?
|
The reason: Guards thought he might pose a threat because they believed he had been looking at them in a suspicious way.
Originally Posted by CelticPax
(Post 17075148)
I heard this segment on the radio driving home. Very chilling! :eek:
I have no doubt about the records keeping either. I'm taking the advice of another recent thread and demanding a privacy act sheet if they ever try to photocopy my ID. Then again, I've stopped flying, but if it happens at a subway or something, I'll keep it in mind. The Mall of America is getting a call and possibly a letter from me. It's one of those destinations that are on my list to visit someday, but no more! Mike |
I think Rosedale is much nicer than MOA and alot less hassle too.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:07 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.