Safe Scanning Technology?
 

So in my mind there are two objections to the NoS. One is privacy and the other is safety (radiation). We use ultrasonics to see into the human body and consider it safe enough for a fetus. Can this technology be adapted to an airport scan? It would completely eliminate one of the objections to the body scanning, and could in theory find "buried" objects or be used to clear WTMD alarms.

As far as I know, ultrasound requires contact. That is a non-starter for speedy scanning of people.

In some airports, they offer the "back scatter" scans which do not emit radiation.

I'm so baffled by this statement that I don't know what to say.

Ummm... you might want to do a little research on this. :eek:

The backscatter machines in the airports use X-rays. The millimeter wave scanners are the safer ones.

I'm guessing a TSO must have told you this????:confused::confused::confused:

Whoever told you this lied to you.:rolleyes:

Oh, you're right. I got them confused. My bad.

What I also don't understand is if the millimeter wave technology is safer, why wouldn't that be the default option in all airports as opposed to having backscatter?

Because TSA doesn't care about safety.

TSA is about power.

That and there is some documentation that shows that th MMW machines might unzip your DNA. So while it is safer, I wouldn't call it safe.

Chertoff didn't represent the MMW company but did represent the Backscatter company and had a direct financial interest in TSA buying Backscatter.

He pushed for the purchase and did not disclose his personal interest until cornered on a news show.

DHS graft!

Also, Rapistscan...ermmm, I mean Rapiscan, is a client of Michael Chertoff's consulting firm. Not sure whether or not L3 is, so that would give Rapiscan and their backscatter cancertrons a leg up on L3 and their MMW gene-shredders.

Actually there are three. Unfortunately, the third is often forgotten about. Yet it is the MOST important, EFFICACY !!! Without (which IMHO there is none) it the other two are moot.

Ultrasound requires skin contact. Further, to get good contact it requires lube. That said to get useful images it requires proficiency. That is not going to happen with the current crop of screeners. Which is why so much of the current technology is automated because of the lowest denominator of the TSO hired.

Because they already have a bunch of the backscatter machines. And there aren't any studies saying that the backscatter machines are unsafe... of course they won't let any third parties actually test the machines. :rolleyes:

The MMW machines use a much higher frequency and lower power beam... but again they won't let any third parties test the machines.