Here you go:
http://www.investigativeproject.org/...s/misc/360.pdf

Department of Justice good enough?

Sorry, it wasn't brown people sitting peacefully in their seats.

hmm. That crazy guy in Norway, the fellow with the blond hair and blue eyes who shot and killed all those young people a few weeks back... I would hate to have a knock on my door in the middle of the night for a warrantless search just because I was in *his* group.....Or get felt up more when I got on my flight because of those kind of genetics...

I remember quite well. I believe it was the neoconservatives under the Bush dynasty with the support and cooperation of the cowardly sheeple that now seem to make up the majority in this country. The blame can also be extended to Obama who never saw a civil rights violation that he didn't like. In the past liberals had usually been more supportive of civil rights. Obama is the start of a new trend where both parties in our two party dictatorship are equally enthusiastic about our new police state. When these people say 'anything to stop the terrorists' they really mean anything.

A crime was committed. A mass murder. But it was not a sufficient reason to change our form of government. It was just a convenient excuse for our government to seize power and that is exactly what they have done. But human rights are a zero sum game. The more rights our government has the fewer we have. The government and their police enforcers now have more freedom and we have less.

Mohamed Atta did not force us to change our system of government. We did it to ourselves. And if we are that cowardly it was inevitable. It would have happened eventually even if that merry band of suicide bombers hadn't taken out the world trade center.

Before you place all the blame on the neoconservatives, you should remember that our sitting liberal president just ordered the assassination of a US Citizen without any judicial oversight.

Yes, a US citizen vacationing in Yemen. Power corrupts. Absolute power, which is close to what POTUS has, will corrupt anyone who gets it.

Did you read my post? I don't see how it could be interpreted as placing all the blame on the neoconservatives.

But let's be fair. They are the ones who started this nonsense with the patriot act and the new millennium police state with more of a focus on internal threats, on domestic extremists, than on any external foe. The war on terror is like the war on drugs. It is really a war against Americans, a war against ourselves.

I am no fan of Obama and summary executions of US citizens without a trial is not something to take lightly. Obama is just carrying the torch, allowing the police state to move forward. Soon summary executions without a trial, or with a farce trial where guilt is presumed, will become more common. You can see the future in people's attitudes toward anyone accused of terrorism. No proof or even any real evidence is necessary. To be accused is to be guilty.

To be fair, we've had the guilty until proven innocent and then still suspected for some time. I point you to the Duke Lacrosse and many other rape or child porn cases.

That was an unusual situation with a rogue prosecutor, rogue police investigators, vengful community, intrigued media, pitiful and untruthful 'victim' and Nancy Grace; it is not really a fair paradigm for the US justice system. The closest thing to the Duke Lacrosse case in recent history is Amanda Knox.

. . . but this has little to do with the OP, so back on topic:

The most important goal of this lawsuit must to be to modify the behaivor of airline crews. A fat check from the carrier everyone LUVs to hate will acomplish nothing-- it will be considered the cost of doing business.

It never ceases to amaze me how fast CAIR shows up after one of these-- they are the ambulance chasers of Muslims in the post-9/11 airline climate. Would it kill them to wait more than 2 hours to come out with a statement of outrage-- being Muhammud on the spot every time makes them look somewhat seedy in my opinion.

I don't particularly trust the FBI when it comes to telling the truth about a special interest group that they decide to target

Well that makes things easy now doesn't it?

Look guys, I am in my seventies. If a pilot of F/A does not fell comfortable with a passenger, regardless of what race, religion, height, weight or whatever criteria you want to throw in, they should have the absolute right to remove this person from that particular flight. Had they removed one of the groups at 9/11 maybe one or two buildings would still stand. Would you have pressed on for suits and damages than as well?
These ( yes these and I mean musliins, which now seems to be politically incorrect because they destroyed the towers but seemingly have nothing to do with it ) people go through TSA without problem. Show me one post by a muslim being targeted and patted down and [B]complaining on FT!!! B[/But look at the cancer stricken people, breast cancer victims, or as in my life, my mother in law with the colostomy bag. And contrary what you guys are wishing for, no money for us:mad:

Surely she must have called. They know, they have the phone number on hand.
It's in their contacts. Everybody is prepared except a white guy. What a country:mad:

I think you have made your position clear: You are ok with racial and/or religious discrimination in the airline sector. I guess some people take the values of our country more seriously than others . . .

By the way, what's your opinion of the Japanese internment camps? Just curious.

Obviously.