There are reports from overseas in the past few weeks that prolong exposure standing near these sort of machines may lead to a significant risk of thyroid cancer. The studies were primarily about MRI technicians but they also speculated that security employees may be in more danger of this cancer because they aren't protected at all like the MRI techs. How do you feel about working next to these machines knowing they may give you cancer 10 years down the road?

That's baloney and you know it. If you ask to have your items in your view, "you're not going to tell me no". BS. Explain the multitudes of reports on here that clearly contradict that.

You "ask" about why people opt out of the WBI to serve your purposes of retribution and intimidation. If the TSA REALLY, REALLY was legitimately interested in what the public had to say, they'd eliminate the WBI, the shoe circus, the kippie bags and the fluid limits.

Look, the easy answer is this: We already go through the magnetometer. Why not walk through an ETP and be done with it? (And please don't insult my intelligence by claiming "technological concerns").

That is not what the head of DHS said. She clearly said that refusal only resulted in a trip thru the WTMD.

So how come you folks at SFO are doing patdowns?

Are you doing anything about it? Providing feedback up the chain of command with your concerns about how the WBI affects the quality of the security process, how it affects the public's view of the security process, etc? If not, then I don't believe "Your safety is our top priority". I believe "I do what I am told, no matter what, so I can pay the rent."

Unfortunately, you may be sincere and not want to intimidate us, but as I am sure you know, perception is reality. The perception is that everything about TSA is to intimidate the flying public and make them cower to all the rules, no matter how inane they may be.

And lastly, do you not understand how absolutely maddening the "that's the rules. I have NO control over it" line is? You have ABSOLUTE control over it! If you were sincere in your beliefs, you would either a) work with the chain of command to improve the process and failing that b) quit.

MMW or backscatter x-ray, neither detects explosives.

T-ray devices are no better at detecting explosives.

Politician. Liar. Lips moving. Check.

Could you please tell us in which terminal and what lanes lead to it? Is it used for primary or secondary screening?

And just to add to the chorus: WBI does not work. You should detect explosives, not images. Images can be anything, including perfectly innocent but very personal things you have no need to know about.

IOW you cant find it either. Why not just admit it?

It was an anology, but I'm sure that does not matter, right?

I get to handel all that already, so there is not going to be a difference in my duties on their account.

Oh get over it. Nothing detects explosives. All the technology does is detect elements that are commonly used in explosives, not the explosives themselves. ETD, ETP, WBI, MMW, none of it works without human assistance and intervention.

ETP and ETD only say that yes these elements are present. The actual detection of the explosives is done by the screeners.

WBI and MMW only give a picture of hidden items. Its screeners who decide if those items are hazardous or prohibited.

They all do exactly what they are designed to do, and they do it well. It’s the screeners who actually do the work of determining what is questionable, prohibited, or hazardous.

Calls for Full-Body Screening Devices Grow After Terror Attempt

"Dec. 29 (Bloomberg) -- A suspected terrorist’s attempt to blow up a U.S. airliner may override privacy concerns and intensify a push for full-body scanning equipment at airports.

U.S. officials charged a 23-year-old Nigerian man with trying to blow up Northwest Flight 253 as it prepared to land in Detroit on Christmas Day. President Barack Obama said yesterday he ordered a thorough review of the episode and called for new scrutiny of screening policies and technologies.

Metal detectors currently used to screen passengers wouldn’t have found the explosive allegedly carried aboard by the suspect, said former Federal Aviation Administration security chief Billie Vincent. Only more sophisticated devices such as low-level X-rays and millimeter-wave technology would work, Vincent said. "

More here

What the "security" perverts in love with strip searching toddlers and great-grandmothers fail to acknowledge is that strip searches -- physical or electronic -- do not detect explosives. Bomb-sniffing dogs, ETP and ETDs do detect explosives.

You seem to have jumped over the truth. Your second sentence above is a fiction.

The USA apparently provided Nigeria with several Nude-o-scopes. Not clear if they were in use at Lagos airport, or whether these were part of a tax-payer funded aid package or paid for by Nigeria.

Follow the money
 

I don't have time to research this right now, but we need to find out where the Nude-O-Scopes are manufactured and in what states do the manufacturer have a substantial presence.