Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Chase | Ultimate Rewards
Reload this Page >

Proprietary Sapphire Reserve directly competes with United Cards

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Proprietary Sapphire Reserve directly competes with United Cards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2019, 7:58 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SFO
Programs: AS 75K (OW), SK Silver (*A), UR, MR
Posts: 3,346
Proprietary Sapphire Reserve directly competes with United Cards


“Sapphire Reserve Strains JPMorgan’s Ties With United Airlines

Bank faces tough balancing act: promoting its own card while keeping happy airline partner that wants more money for miles”


https://www.wsj.com/articles/sapphire-reserve-strains-jpmorgans-ties-with-united-airlines-11561627802

I have both cards and heading favorably in the CSR direction due to the considerable perks. I may keep the United card though given the paid bags outweighing the annual fee.

Last edited by vanillabean; Jun 27, 2019 at 9:39 am Reason: Title clarification
vanillabean is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 9:12 am
  #2  
Moderator: Travel Buzz
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 3,099
True, this! Unfortunately I can't access the article because I'm not a subscriber, but I get the gist. The writing was on the wall 2 years ago, when consumers massively KEPT their CSR's at renewal time. Our household downgraded 3 United cards to the fee free version, and kept the CSRs. It doesn't help that United award flights got so tremendously expensive to redeem. I like long haul business class, and its become a slow trek to get enough points to find a motivating redemption. By leaving the points parked at Chase as UR's, I'm not locked in.
StartinSanDiego is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 10:02 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC (LGA, JFK), CT
Programs: Delta Platinum, American Gold, JetBlue Mosaic 4, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Diamond,
Posts: 4,895
The solution seems simple - allow credit card holders to earn PQM at various spending thresholds like Delta/AMEX do
Adelphos is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 10:30 am
  #4  
mia
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,955
United executives have told JPMorgan they believe the Sapphire Reserve card is competing directly with the airline’s cards and siphoning off customer spending, according to people familiar with the matter
UA is OK with Chase issuing cards for other airlines, but not with Chase promoting its own rewards program? Simple enough to fix. UA can:

  • withdraw from Ultimate Rewards
  • cap annual transfers from UR to UA
  • change the UR to UA transfer ratio

Any one of these changes would encourage people who want to accumulate UA miles to use a UA co-branded card.
mia is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 10:44 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,848
Originally Posted by mia
UA is OK with Chase issuing cards for other airlines, but not with Chase promoting its own rewards program? Simple enough to fix. UA can:
  • withdraw from Ultimate Rewards
  • cap annual transfers from UR to UA
  • change the UR to UA transfer ratio
Any one of these changes would encourage people who want to accumulate UA miles to use a UA co-branded card.
the article mentions that Citi hasn’t been able to get AA to become a TYP transfer partner, so I guess they saw the writing on the wall. The question here is: when does UA’s transfer partner contract expire?
SightseeMC likes this.
notquiteaff is online now  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 11:04 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,881
Originally Posted by mia
Simple enough to fix. UA can:
  • withdraw from Ultimate Rewards
  • cap annual transfers from UR to UA
  • change the UR to UA transfer ratio

Any one of these changes would encourage people who want to accumulate UA miles to use a UA co-branded card.
And/or increase earn rate on UA card spending.
Troopers is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 1:17 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 81
I don't know exactly how these co-branded cards work, but somebody nerfed the 40% points bonus for spending at least $25K / year on the Explorer card. That was a nice incentive to keep the card in one's wallet (Guess they thought the 2x for dining was a suitable replacement). The Amex/Delta and Citi/Barclays/American cards, as weak as they are, offer incentives for actually using their cards. What did UA expect? Were we supposed to use their cards out of the kindness of our hearts?
Adelphos and cuthroat like this.
holyPockets is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 2:11 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
At least CSR holders have an idea of what their TYPs are worth. UA miles are black-boxed value; you have no real incentive to compile them. That is purely United's fault. As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 6:17 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PHX, ICN
Programs: OZ Diamond Plus, Marriott Gold
Posts: 502
Originally Posted by BearX220
At least CSR holders have an idea of what their TYPs are worth. UA miles are black-boxed value; you have no real incentive to compile them. That is purely United's fault. As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
TL;DR: it appears UA's overall strategy is minimizing point liability instead of driving incremental revenue from increased reward value

I think Bear is correct, big picture. The reason transferable points are gaining value so rapidly (and thus tilting the balance of value between bank cards and co-branded cards) is the rapid devaluation of individual award currencies. UA will push that for themselves even further with dynamic pricing, and have to use band-aids like pulling away from UR as a transfer partner. IMHO it's undoubtedly the right idea, if you're thinking short-term solutions to issues caused by your overall strategy, just like cutting benefits for CC users cuts costs. But that's all based on a strategy of minimizing the liabilities for point spend instead of incentivizing incremental revenue from increased CC or flight revenue.

I'm sure for us as consumers it will get worse (at least with the oligopoly airlines; smaller carriers may still sell loyalty value) before it gets better.
BearX220 likes this.
SightseeMC is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2019, 11:24 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: HNL
Programs: AS MVPG, HA Plat
Posts: 1,268
Originally Posted by notquiteaff


the article mentions that Citi hasn’t been able to get AA to become a TYP transfer partner, so I guess they saw the writing on the wall. The question here is: when does UA’s transfer partner contract expire?
And yet somehow Delta seems to be making it work with Amex, despite Skymiles being even more devalued than MP and MR being at least comparable to UR. Maybe United should try copying Delta and add some benefits to their cobrand cards that are actually valuable to frequent flyers. Or does the “Copy Delta” chapter in the management handbook only cover devaluations?
lsquare likes this.
WrightHI is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2019, 6:09 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott Titanium, Hertz President's Circle, UA Silver, Mobile Passport Unobtanium
Posts: 6,193
Originally Posted by WrightHI


And yet somehow Delta seems to be making it work with Amex, despite Skymiles being even more devalued than MP and MR being at least comparable to UR. Maybe United should try copying Delta and add some benefits to their cobrand cards that are actually valuable to frequent flyers. Or does the “Copy Delta” chapter in the management handbook only cover devaluations?
No, it covers price increases too.
RaginPlainsman likes this.
Diplomatico is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2019, 5:13 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
I haven't read the WSJ article since it's behind a pay wall.

But supposedly a lot of this discontent is coming from Kirby, who supposedly is the one who negotiated the current deal in 2015 with Chase which runs to 2025.
wco81 is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2019, 10:27 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 727
Great article. United supposedly has asked chase to pay more for its miles. When the sapphire reserve came out, United cards dropped. Mileage plus was 55% of carrier revenue.

For me the chase United is a keeper. Two lounge passes worth $10 each, can use card to defeat basic economy- three one way segment per year pays for itself. Used to use the primary car rental insurance but duplicated with chase sapphire and us bank altitude reserve.

Once I’m under 5/24 will get business version and drop personal explorer card. Business version is tax deductible, so effective $60 annual fee- two one way segments in basic economy to come out ahead.
schistosomiasis is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2019, 10:27 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,848
Originally Posted by wco81
I haven't read the WSJ article since it's behind a pay wall.

But supposedly a lot of this discontent is coming from Kirby, who supposedly is the one who negotiated the current deal in 2015 with Chase which runs to 2025.
Was he moonlighting? In 2015 he was still working for AA
notquiteaff is online now  
Old Jun 29, 2019, 3:22 am
  #15  
mia
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA & Marriott Perpetual Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 48,955
Originally Posted by schistosomiasis
.... Business version is tax deductible,....
The marketing label that a card issuer sticks on a card does not determine if the cost qualifies as a deductible expense. It's how the card is used that is important.
krazykanuck and GUWonder like this.
mia is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.