Originally Posted by darkhound
(Post 27024168)
Probably because it's a frugal/calculating mindset that got them to where they can spend $100k in the first place.
Separately, many are business spenders. Spend $100k, much of which will get reimbursed. But the fee is out of pocket. |
I think what might be JP Morgan Chase's goal is to cull the herd regarding the JPM Palladium Card. The original intent of the Palladium Card was to offer a premium product for JPM Private Bank clients. People found a loophole and were able to apply for the card without having any relationship with JPM PB. Then the retail bank side of Chase started offering the Palladium Card to Chase Private Client customers. I think now with the Chase Sapphire Reserve card coming out, JPM Chase would like to migrate current CPC clients with the Palladium card to the CSR and make it once again a JPM Private Bank product. I don't think that most Palladium card holders who are JPM PB clients would cancel their cards for the CSR. Since I don't think that they can force migrate customers from Palladium card to Chase Sapphire Reserve they might offer the some kind of bonus to entice people to make the switch and bring the Palladium card back to its original intent of being a JPM PB product.
|
Originally Posted by AAdmiral
(Post 27025403)
... I don't think that they can force migrate customers from Palladium card to Chase Sapphire Reserve....
|
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 27025565)
What would be the obstacle? Citi forced transitions from Chairman MasterCard to Prestige MasterCard.
|
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 27025565)
What would be the obstacle? Citi forced transitions from Chairman MasterCard to Prestige MasterCard.
|
Originally Posted by AAdmiral
(Post 27025403)
I think what might be JP Morgan Chase's goal is to cull the herd regarding the JPM Palladium Card. The original intent of the Palladium Card was to offer a premium product for JPM Private Bank clients.
|
Originally Posted by AAdmiral
(Post 27026363)
When Citi forced the product change from Chairman MC to Prestige MC were any card holders allowed to keep the Chairman MC or were all Chairman MC card holders transitioned to the Prestige MC? .
It will be interesting (for me) to see if Chase abandons the JP Morgan brand for credit cards or if they raise the annual fee and take a pass at competing with American Express Centurion. I don't see any point to having both a $450 card and a $595 card. |
Palladium Card was officially shows on Chase Private Client Website? So It is not only for JPM PC right now.
https://www.chase.com/online/private...ge-banking.htm Also If Palladium Card change to CSR, how about the hiding Credit line? And Private Jet benefits? To someone, the unlimited Credit line is the priority. The CSR could not replaced Palladium Card. Not like Prestige Card and Chairman Card in Citi-Bank, Chase-Palladium and Chase-Sapphire-Reserve are totally different product. The Annual fee for Palladium is the Money (low rate) you loss in CPC Saving account (250k in discover saving account is $2500 per year) plus the $595, that is larger than Amex-Centurion Card. Originally Posted by mia View Post What would be the obstacle? Citi forced transitions from Chairman MasterCard to Prestige MasterCard. |
Originally Posted by darkhound
(Post 27024168)
Probably because it's a frugal/calculating mindset that got them to where they can spend $100k in the first place.
Separately, many are business spenders. Spend $100k, much of which will get reimbursed. But the fee is out of pocket. |
Originally Posted by Shaw Yu
(Post 27027408)
Palladium Card was officially shows on Chase Private Client Website? So It is not only for JPM PC right now.
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 27027287)
It will be interesting (for me) to see if Chase abandons the JP Morgan brand for credit cards or if they raise the annual fee and take a pass at competing with American Express Centurion. I don't see any point to having both a $450 card and a $595 card.
|
Originally Posted by AAdmiral
(Post 27029767)
Obviously JPM would need to add more features to the card like a full lounge membership published as a benefit which would be the United Club since they have a relationship with United. Also they would need to offer elite hotel status with their partners such as Marriott, Hyatt, IHG, Fairmont Hotels since Chase issues all of the above credit cards for the respective hotel chains. Elite airline level with United and/or British Airways would be another feature needed. This would start to truly put the Palladium on par with Amex Centurion. Add Avis Chairmans Club membership to counter Amex Centurion Hertz Platinum and we have a true competitor. Obviously these are some of the things on my wish list for making the Palladium Card better. Adding these benefits or some would make paying a higher annual fee justified.
IMO, lounge status is overrated. Every "highend" card gets you lounge status these days. And you can just pay for a yearly membership. United is only good for domestic. Better is airline status, if they can swing it. I'm not big on hotel status at boring chain hotels, especially the likes of Marriott and Hyatt, or even IHG and Fairmont. Much better would be annual black status at GHA or similar for unique boutique hotels. I find rental car status to be useless and a gimmick. |
Originally Posted by darkhound
(Post 27032697)
I'm ok with a higher annual fee but they should start with making sure the Palladium gets basic benefits that the Reserve will get. For example, 3x on travel and dining. If you're going to be paying a high AF, you want simplicity. You don't want multiple cards for no reason. Right now, Palladium doesn't even have 2x on dine, as Preferred has. Pretty pathetic.
Originally Posted by darkhound
(Post 27032697)
IMO, lounge status is overrated. Every "highend" card gets you lounge status these days. And you can just pay for a yearly membership. United is only good for domestic.
Originally Posted by darkhound
(Post 27032697)
Better is airline status, if they can swing it. I'm not big on hotel status at boring chain hotels, especially the likes of Marriott and Hyatt, or even IHG and Fairmont. Much better would be annual black status at GHA or similar for unique boutique hotels. I find rental car status to be useless and a gimmick.
|
Moderator action
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:07 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.