Cathay Dragon biz seats
#16
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
#17
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Programs: SQ PPS SOLITAIRE, AA ,HHONOR GOLD, BONVOY GOLD, IHG PLAT
Posts: 2,041
Also,, have you seen the blankets on KA (even in J) ? They look like they haven't been washed in months, just wrapped in a wrinkled old bag. I wouldn't dare touch one.
I wish KA had a better hard/soft product, but in reality they beat SQ Y only with a better seat. In every other dept., SQ Y > KA J.
#18
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: HKG,SIN,CAN
Programs: CX MPC DM, HU FWC Gold
Posts: 213
Sorry I don't agree. I can't see how I am getting even an inch more pitch than AK/AA domestic narrow body seats. And, I'm ashamed to say, the quality of food is much better on those airlines.
Also,, have you seen the blankets on KA (even in J) ? They look like they haven't been washed in months, just wrapped in a wrinkled old bag. I wouldn't dare touch one.
I wish KA had a better hard/soft product, but in reality they beat SQ Y only with a better seat. In every other dept., SQ Y > KA J.
Also,, have you seen the blankets on KA (even in J) ? They look like they haven't been washed in months, just wrapped in a wrinkled old bag. I wouldn't dare touch one.
I wish KA had a better hard/soft product, but in reality they beat SQ Y only with a better seat. In every other dept., SQ Y > KA J.
#19
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: BA SL, CX GR, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 579
Sorry I don't agree. I can't see how I am getting even an inch more pitch than AK/AA domestic narrow body seats. And, I'm ashamed to say, the quality of food is much better on those airlines.
Also,, have you seen the blankets on KA (even in J) ? They look like they haven't been washed in months, just wrapped in a wrinkled old bag. I wouldn't dare touch one.
I wish KA had a better hard/soft product, but in reality they beat SQ Y only with a better seat. In every other dept., SQ Y > KA J.
Also,, have you seen the blankets on KA (even in J) ? They look like they haven't been washed in months, just wrapped in a wrinkled old bag. I wouldn't dare touch one.
I wish KA had a better hard/soft product, but in reality they beat SQ Y only with a better seat. In every other dept., SQ Y > KA J.
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Sorry to disagree. I do not find KA to be this bad. The seats are not flatbed ones, but are nice enough for regional journeys. They have reasonable space and recline, and more importantly, they don’t recline into the space of the pax behind. Soft product is also fine, excellent services from the crew, although one may argue catering on KA or even CX could be better.
#21
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Programs: SQ PPS SOLITAIRE, AA ,HHONOR GOLD, BONVOY GOLD, IHG PLAT
Posts: 2,041
Sorry to disagree. I do not find KA to be this bad. The seats are not flatbed ones, but are nice enough for regional journeys. They have reasonable space and recline, and more importantly, they don’t recline into the space of the pax behind. Soft product is also fine, excellent services from the crew, although one may argue catering on KA or even CX could be better.
Honestly, those seats are not very good for a 4 hour flight. Is it possible seat pitch is a bit tighter on the A320 vs A330 ?
This is the case both ex: HKG and ex: CCU.
FYI - I do not have high standards for food, especially in the air.
#22
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 60
I agree with the down hill trend of KA J food. Was on a HKG/PVG flight a few weeks' ago for full dinner service. The entree was ONE pathetic single piece of scallop laying on top of some lettuce. The bread was hard as a rock on one side. The main is a hit a miss. Sometimes the regional flavour of the day is good (I think I had some good claypots before) but this time was some average Chinese food which I cannot recall now. Then there is the ice cream - nothing spectacular. Although I noticed they now offer 4 white and 4 red wine choices.
KA J food used to be miles ahead of CX on the same route but now I think the gap is very narrow.
KA J food used to be miles ahead of CX on the same route but now I think the gap is very narrow.
#23
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 207
Ok but we are booked now. In any case the connection is short and I liked the idea of using Cathay. I wanted to experience this airline and we get into PEK reasonably early at around 1700 IIRC. That I like as we fly back to Chicago the next day at 1200. We are staying at the airport Hilton so we should be able to get to our room fairly quickly.
Thanks for the help.
Larry
Thanks for the help.
Larry
#24
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
Maybe it is route specific then. The food on the route I am always on, HGK-CCU vv is always a cheap Y meal in J (SQ Y is better). The blankets are always dirty, wrinkled, and sealed in obviously reused plastic bags.
Honestly, those seats are not very good for a 4 hour flight. Is it possible seat pitch is a bit tighter on the A320 vs A330 ?
This is the case both ex: HKG and ex: CCU.
FYI - I do not have high standards for food, especially in the air.
Honestly, those seats are not very good for a 4 hour flight. Is it possible seat pitch is a bit tighter on the A320 vs A330 ?
This is the case both ex: HKG and ex: CCU.
FYI - I do not have high standards for food, especially in the air.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
I can't recall ever taking a four hour KA flight, but can attest to the fact that food on the Shanghai routes has taken a nosedive (i.e. approaching CX levels) on the Shanghai routes.
#26
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
I've flown HKG-KUL route quite a few times, it is scheduled about 4 hours. I found the service being quite boring as they normally finish meal service quite quickly after take off and will take your tray away around 1.5 - 2 hrs into flight. Left us nothing to eat or drink for the rest 2 hours. Of course you can ask for something, however for whoever new, the experience will be bad.
#27
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 207
Ok so checking back after the flights and all was fine. We basically had two 4ish hour flights with a change of planes in HK. The seats for these shorter flights were fine, food was good enough and the service was very good. Thanks for the input. Larry
#28
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: AC SE MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 904
I've flown HKG-KUL route quite a few times, it is scheduled about 4 hours. I found the service being quite boring as they normally finish meal service quite quickly after take off and will take your tray away around 1.5 - 2 hrs into flight. Left us nothing to eat or drink for the rest 2 hours. Of course you can ask for something, however for whoever new, the experience will be bad.
#29
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: BA SL, CX GR, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 579
I think that’d be just the meal service for regional flight.
#30
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
Neither CX nor KA have snacks in the galley during short flights, and both are just a meal in regional J. Just want to make the point this really isn't about KA so much as it is about CX regional + KA. Same goes for the title of this thread.
Coffee, water, drinks etc are available throughout just hit the call light.
And you could always ask for something if you're still hungry. Something will almost certainly still be available from meal service, maybe some fruit or bread etc.