Short of points to renew DM
#16
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
I think sscywong is referring to full Y fare ex-HKG. Unfortunately, CX isn't that stupid. (and this is why Cathay Dragon's frequent exhortation for CX to sell cheapo biz class fares ex-HKG is difficult, although it isn't impossible and I like the suggestion. Just saying there are more variables that must be dealt with).
.
.
Last time I tried to price HKG-PEK-HKG, $6,000 HKD. Changed it to TPE-HKG-PEK-HKG-TPE, the price reduced to $2,800 HKD. Ridiculous.
#17
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
I'll go on the record. I have around 700 points (not 800 points as the lucky poster that got renewed to DM), but they are all C class travel, and most of them J/D fares. If Cathay also renews me that would REALLY impresses me, and definitely win my loyalty back.
#18
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SPG Pt, Le Club Accor GO, Shangri-La GC Jade
Posts: 1,327
Well, I've figured something out (I'm sure experts here already figured this out and posted somewhere in here). Just take a short-hop to TPE (not on Cathay because of price.....) and then origin the flight from TPE and all of a sudden you get more than 50% off.
Last time I tried to price HKG-PEK-HKG, $6,000 HKD. Changed it to TPE-HKG-PEK-HKG-TPE, the price reduced to $2,800 HKD. Ridiculous.
Last time I tried to price HKG-PEK-HKG, $6,000 HKD. Changed it to TPE-HKG-PEK-HKG-TPE, the price reduced to $2,800 HKD. Ridiculous.
That's also why while our company "encourage" us to buy cheaper fare class econ tix I keep buying Y fare... Even ex-HKG B fare doesn't allow free no-show go-show... I simply don't want to worry about "I need to change my flight" in the middle of my overrun meeting.... And not to say now only Y fare can let me have guaranteed seats up to T - 24 hours
That said, for personal trip that I can plan ahead I'll definitely make good use of ex-whatever appropriate
#19
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 27
Unless OP's been flying all short hauls.. otherwise it is very unlikely that he/she would have more than 1200 cps in the updated system.
It is actually good to know. My wife is 40 points away from renewing her GO at end of Dec. I guess she can relax now without doing a MR which will be a waste of few thousand HKD.
Is your DM renewal date end of Oct or Nov?
I received my new DM pack on 3 Nov
#20
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
#22
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
#23
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 27
#24
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
#25
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,170
as far as good gesture is noted, inconsistency plants sense of unfairness to others and do more damage. granted not everyone is aware of stealth renewal but all it takes is Apple Daily to report (in fact, any reporters here?) and agitate the masses.
i respect rules. i want my FFP program to be clear and transparent... not moving goalposts subject to mood of prevailing CEOs
#26
Join Date: Jan 2006
Programs: AAdvantage Asia Miles Air China
Posts: 870
see their inconsistent bending of rules just makes people like Cxfan1960 more annoyed... i would be if i were you... someone who suffered last year have no recourse yet DM this year seems to get free extension. where do you draw a line?
as far as good gesture is noted, inconsistency plants sense of unfairness to others and do more damage. granted not everyone is aware of stealth renewal but all it takes is Apple Daily to report (in fact, any reporters here?) and agitate the masses.
i respect rules. i want my FFP program to be clear and transparent... not moving goalposts subject to mood of prevailing CEOs
as far as good gesture is noted, inconsistency plants sense of unfairness to others and do more damage. granted not everyone is aware of stealth renewal but all it takes is Apple Daily to report (in fact, any reporters here?) and agitate the masses.
i respect rules. i want my FFP program to be clear and transparent... not moving goalposts subject to mood of prevailing CEOs
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,556
I've been a Cathay DM for more than 10 years and I've never received such "joker". The two-years that I literally just-missed (one case 3000 miles, another case less than 1000 miles), I called MPO to appeal and no avail, the best is one-to-two months extension.
I'll go on the record. I have around 700 points (not 800 points as the lucky poster that got renewed to DM), but they are all C class travel, and most of them J/D fares. If Cathay also renews me that would REALLY impresses me, and definitely win my loyalty back.
I'll go on the record. I have around 700 points (not 800 points as the lucky poster that got renewed to DM), but they are all C class travel, and most of them J/D fares. If Cathay also renews me that would REALLY impresses me, and definitely win my loyalty back.
But I have two real examples, one GO family, the other DM best friend, where they were renewed ex-post although they were below re qualification levels.
I can understand that this is not a published and systematic benefit at any airline and that they must have some algorithm that select people.
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,556
CX is historically ruthless to people who pay serious $ to the airline, but fail to make the grade the next year. This situation (renewing at 800, and with the number of similar anecdotes that are piling up here and in other threads) is definitely a new thing. I am perhaps taking this too far a stretch, but given some of the changes that are happening on the customer side, I think Hogg must have a different leadership style / philosophy than Ivan Chu and we're seeing some effects immediately. (one other positive thing not mentioned in here: prices for staff travel were just reduced for many routes. I'm all for anything picking up staff morale, because selfishly it helps us the customer. We the paying customers ultimately pay the price when staff hate their job and don't trust the CEO).
Interestingly, I think CX is keenly aware of a Hong Kong dynamic this last decade - the total death of the expat package - on the cost side, but hasn't realized it (or is just realizing it) on the revenue side. On the cost side, obviously CX is hiring local pilots and cutting all foreign pilots to a local package. Instead of the half million USD/year packages and living on the peak old school expat pilots enjoyed (perhaps some exaggeration, but not much), which is obviously unsustainable and completely unnecessary in this day and age. But on the revenue side, how tickets are purchased have changed. It's not a hardship to get people to move to Hong Kong. And local financial firms do not have to offer the same perks to employees transferring from NY or London, even if those employees enjoy lucrative compensation privileges simply as a result of their rank and industry.
What I mean is, 10 years agoI could point to multiple banks who had more "loose" travel policies in Asia versus North America, and part of that was the internal understanding banks needed to encourage talent to travel abroad to developing markets. (It also helped that emerging markets were seen as unlimited growth potential and Asia was exotic to guys in NY, so the tolerances for absurd Asian loss-making divisions were high). You would have vice presidents and below on equity capital markets teams flying primarily economy class in the US as dictated in their contracts, yet they'd be exclusively in J class in Asia. Well, those days are ending too.
Yet CX's MPC program still is designed for expat types, as Harbour Gent alludes to above, instead of folks who either pay for their own travel or self-direct it. Hong Kong's legacy as an expat banking center is one of the reason it hasn't been too big a deal for CX to be ruthless to travelers who maybe are DM for 5 years and "pay" (aka Morgan Stanley pays) a few hundred thousand in revenues to CX, but are quickly cut to GO or SL the first year they don't make the grade. This is acceptable behavior if that traveler was a VP in derivatives at Morgan Stanley, because realistically he might've just transferred to Dubai where he'll be flying Emirates, or to a different broker with a travel different policy, or the buy side. In short this traveler is under no illusion that his DM status is nothing but a result of his job at MS. It's almost a perk of the job.
But as expat-type packages and travel policies in Asia are cut, you end up filling J class with more self-directed spenders. And for those people the relationship with CX is more personal since there isn't a middle man like the employer (or, I know of multiple firms where the employer is paying, but the staff are legitimately choosing and "paying" for their own travel out of a budget allotment, and the staff are incenvitized in various ways to save costs for the firm).
Interestingly, I think CX is keenly aware of a Hong Kong dynamic this last decade - the total death of the expat package - on the cost side, but hasn't realized it (or is just realizing it) on the revenue side. On the cost side, obviously CX is hiring local pilots and cutting all foreign pilots to a local package. Instead of the half million USD/year packages and living on the peak old school expat pilots enjoyed (perhaps some exaggeration, but not much), which is obviously unsustainable and completely unnecessary in this day and age. But on the revenue side, how tickets are purchased have changed. It's not a hardship to get people to move to Hong Kong. And local financial firms do not have to offer the same perks to employees transferring from NY or London, even if those employees enjoy lucrative compensation privileges simply as a result of their rank and industry.
What I mean is, 10 years agoI could point to multiple banks who had more "loose" travel policies in Asia versus North America, and part of that was the internal understanding banks needed to encourage talent to travel abroad to developing markets. (It also helped that emerging markets were seen as unlimited growth potential and Asia was exotic to guys in NY, so the tolerances for absurd Asian loss-making divisions were high). You would have vice presidents and below on equity capital markets teams flying primarily economy class in the US as dictated in their contracts, yet they'd be exclusively in J class in Asia. Well, those days are ending too.
Yet CX's MPC program still is designed for expat types, as Harbour Gent alludes to above, instead of folks who either pay for their own travel or self-direct it. Hong Kong's legacy as an expat banking center is one of the reason it hasn't been too big a deal for CX to be ruthless to travelers who maybe are DM for 5 years and "pay" (aka Morgan Stanley pays) a few hundred thousand in revenues to CX, but are quickly cut to GO or SL the first year they don't make the grade. This is acceptable behavior if that traveler was a VP in derivatives at Morgan Stanley, because realistically he might've just transferred to Dubai where he'll be flying Emirates, or to a different broker with a travel different policy, or the buy side. In short this traveler is under no illusion that his DM status is nothing but a result of his job at MS. It's almost a perk of the job.
But as expat-type packages and travel policies in Asia are cut, you end up filling J class with more self-directed spenders. And for those people the relationship with CX is more personal since there isn't a middle man like the employer (or, I know of multiple firms where the employer is paying, but the staff are legitimately choosing and "paying" for their own travel out of a budget allotment, and the staff are incenvitized in various ways to save costs for the firm).
The world/industry is changing and company have become very cost conscious and ask for competitive quotes from different airlines with the flying pax having options to choose; the money being deducted from his/department account.
Should add that it is now difficult to recruit expats for work visa reasons.
#30
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
I guess she can now relax a bit now. Bottom line, she'll need to give MPC a call to give her another month to finish the other 40 cp.