FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Cathay Pacific | Cathay (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay-487/)
-   -   Leg Space on Airbus A330.... (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay/538141-leg-space-airbus-a330.html)

Klaxon Mar 22, 2006 5:32 am

Good tip, I am taking NRT-DXB via HKG in two weeks and the HKG-DXB leg is a 330.

Kampai,
Klaxon :p

marcuslai Mar 22, 2006 6:47 am


Originally Posted by B-HQC
This is not a valid complaint.

You should have known before your flight that CX had 31-32" pitch in economy which is the industry standard. Regarding the video box restricting legroom, would you prefer to be flying another airline without PTVs?

no two ways about it, CX Y equipment blows unless u have an aisle seat on an exit row. :td: :td: :td: :td:

LH747FTL Mar 22, 2006 9:48 am

Have only flown twice on the 330 in Y - both times row 30 which is the first row. But I also tried a seat in the back - only comparable legroom has been on Lion Air, Orient Thai and Ryanair. It was horrible.

But sometimes I have a problem with the bulkheads too - had a 744 on FRA-HKG that had the audio/video controls fitted so that seat width was severely restricted. The ex-SQ on HKG-BKK had the usual remote so it was much better.

tfung Mar 23, 2006 9:20 am


Originally Posted by CMB Transit
Suggestion: Get the seats in exit rows or bulkhead rows in the middle
section (not the window sections). You'll get plenty more legroom in
those seats, plus no people reclining against you.

While more legroom is good, seats are quite a bit narrower in the exit and bulkhead rows.... For me, 50% of my comfort comes from legroom, the other 50% from seat width.. so I would just avoid the 330 and much rather get a seat on a 777...

UA 882 Mar 29, 2006 6:06 am


Originally Posted by christep
Er, just to be clear, CX doesn't offer AVOD in Economy. It does have an excellent AVOD in business and first.

Are you serious? And SQ gives you AVOD in all three classes? That's kinda a no-brainer...

B-HQC Mar 29, 2006 7:39 am

Fly SQ then. CX won't be missing your business.

F and J are where the money are, and CX at this point in time does not think that it is cost effective to install AVOD in economy. They might install AVOD in Y in a few years when they retrofit the new F & J cabins.

Given that CX's economy class product is still miles ahead of most airlines, and that they have a satisfactory load factor, CX has nothing to worry about.

LH747FTL Mar 29, 2006 12:03 pm


Given that CX's economy class product is still miles ahead of most airlines, and that they have a satisfactory load factor, CX has nothing to worry about.
Miles ahead by what standards? The difference I noticed between LH and CX was a menu and a useless amenity kit. Food was the same junk, and so were the seats and service. :rolleyes:

B-HQC Mar 30, 2006 1:43 am

LH does not even have PTV on its newest aircraft, or any of their aircraft for that matter (except the ex. Sabena ones). The reason - they are not making money in Y. Yields are extremely low. Similar to CX - but LH's situation is much worse, and they have taken it a step further.

CMB Transit Mar 30, 2006 3:18 am


Originally Posted by B-HQC
Fly SQ then. CX won't be missing your business.

F and J are where the money are, and CX at this point in time does not think that it is cost effective to install AVOD in economy. They might install AVOD in Y in a few years when they retrofit the new F & J cabins.

Given that CX's economy class product is still miles ahead of most airlines, and that they have a satisfactory load factor, CX has nothing to worry about.

While the 744 seats and the Enhanced Economy Class Seats (plus some
ex-SQ seats on A343) are decent, the CX seats on 34D and 333 are said
to be extremely narrow and uncomfortable, the BA/QF seats may be better
but they have less seat pitch than CX.

In terms of services, I think QF is already ahead of CX at least on the LHR-
HKG route, and the installation of AVOD would be another advantage of QF.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:18 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.