New regional business class seat revealed
Business Class seat revealed by same Twitter acc, reported by omaat it appears that they are using the Collins Air Rest seat. A bit surprised with the finishing as it doesn’t look like the traditional green/blue seat covers I’ve been accustomed to see on CX planes (bar KA’s now retired first class) |
A bit more on this: https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...ess-class-seat
And yes, it's the Collins Air Rest, which is already in service with Oman Air's Boeing 737 MAX – so these pics of the Oman Air seat will offer a bit more of a clue on Cathay's version (including that, as expected and in common with the current CX/KA regional business class seat, it lives in and reclines into its own fixed shell). https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...f8ef1ed493.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...2d912f8572.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...c00d3a1a0d.jpg |
New regional business class seat revealed
Looks a bit disappointing to me. I hope it’s not another fail - will have to look up some reviews of Oman air seat to see how comfortable it could be.
|
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 32877343)
Looks a bit disappointing to me. I hope it’s not another fail - will have to look up some reviews of Oman air seat to see how comfortable it could be.
Though what are the differences between this and the old KA regional business class? On a personal level I would hope CX picks a more attractive colour scheme than Oman Air. Now as long as they do not repeat fixed shell seats for economy, though it is about time that someone in the new generation thinks this is a wonderful idea. |
Looking at the pics I hope that they don't use the A321 on any routes I fly.
|
Here's a review of the Oman Air seat. The reviewer starts off by saying "this is like a super luxurious premium economy seat...."
|
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 32877673)
|
In my experience, most (non-flatbed) regional business class is like a good premium economy seat – that's certainly how I generally describe this category.
It can be (and often is) better-appointed than your long-haul premium economy product, because it's 'business class' and thus your top-most cabin on those jets (whereas premium economy always sits below 'proper' business class, and sometimes there's even first class above that). As a matter of fact, it can also work the other way: Cathay's first-gen premium economy seat was a modified Zodiac/Weber single-aisle business class seat which Korean Air used for regional business class while American and Delta rolled it out as ‘first class’ on some Boeing 737s and 757s. So yeah, quite some crossover between premium economy and regional business class. |
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 32877673)
Here's a review of the Oman Air seat. The reviewer starts off by saying "this is like a super luxurious premium economy seat...."
|
This seat does seem to have more privacy... but also it looks quite cramped and not as spacious as the old one
Also CX is cutting # of J seats on the A321 in half, even those planes are going on longer regional routes? I remembered that KA A321s have 24J spread across 6 rows... This plane could be a nightmare on regional red-eyes |
The bulk head seats are gone too! seems like all seats are identical.... Those fake leg rest is useless for tall people.
|
and that is all they can do? good or bad thta SQ doesnt compete with cx
i honestly thought first when i saw photo (without reading headlines) i was like "wow thats a really cool Premium econony/business minus which is it" |
Originally Posted by fakecd
(Post 32878125)
and that is all they can do? good or bad thta SQ doesnt compete with cx
i honestly thought first when i saw photo (without reading headlines) i was like "wow thats a really cool Premium econony/business minus which is it" Not really sure what's the major improvement in this seat, other than a small divider? Feels more like CX only install this seats, just to have a slimmer shell so they can put more seats in the back :mad:
Originally Posted by shd9
(Post 32877854)
This seat does seem to have more privacy... but also it looks quite cramped and not as spacious as the old one
Also CX is cutting # of J seats on the A321 in half, even those planes are going on longer regional routes? I remembered that KA A321s have 24J spread across 6 rows... This plane could be a nightmare on regional red-eyes 24 was probably an overkill except for PVG but they couldn't have done 16? Longer Regional? I'm going to see this on KTM then, Eff me :td::td::td: At least I never had the pleasure of BLR :D |
Originally Posted by Short hair Francis
(Post 32880166)
Good Point fakecd, they couldn't have use the BE Diamond Seat like the SQ 7M8s?
Not really sure what's the major improvement in this seat, other than a small divider? Feels more like CX only install this seats, just to have a slimmer shell so they can put more seats in the back :mad: 12J? :confused: 24 was probably an overkill except for PVG but they couldn't have done 16? Longer Regional? I'm going to see this on KTM then, Eff me :td::td::td: At least I never had the pleasure of BLR :D |
Maybe I took too many regional J as redeye flights, but I would have killed for some real recline akin to Qantas domestic J or even JAL Class J over this. Not to be.
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the SQ 7M8s have the Vantage seats? Which means there are alternating rows of 2-2 and 1-1. The 1-1 throne seats therefore have 4x more table/storage space compared to the 2-2 seats. I don't like the product inconsistency and would feel annoyed paying the same price if I could only get one of the 2-2 seats.
Don't really like this new color scheme, but it matches the previous KA F (cirrus) color scheme on the A330s. Looks more comfortable than the previous generation, will have to try it to know for sure. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 32880407)
Maybe I took too many regional J as redeye flights, but I would have killed for some real recline akin to Qantas domestic J or even JAL Class J over this. Not to be.
|
Originally Posted by clubeurope
(Post 32881732)
SriLankan’s A320 recliners has possibly got to have one of the best reclines (and legroom) I’ve ever seen. Sure this seat looks snazzy and all, but it really gives away the comfort. Unless CX commits on not flying these on longer regionals (which I doubt), it’s not much of an improvement :(
https://milelion.com/wp-content/uplo...an-A320-44.jpg |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 32881861)
This one https://milelion.com/2019/01/16/circ...mb-doh-review/ ?
https://milelion.com/wp-content/uplo...an-A320-44.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...43ac5f2d9.jpeg https://www.navjot-singh.com/airline...ss-airbus-a321 had this seat on a short red-eye to Seychelles and it was the best sleep i’ve had on a recliner |
Originally Posted by clubeurope
(Post 32881899)
this one, although that also looks pretty substantial
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...43ac5f2d9.jpeg https://www.navjot-singh.com/airline...ss-airbus-a321 had this seat on a short red-eye to Seychelles and it was the best sleep i’ve had on a recliner [photo deleted, wrong photo posted] |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 32881923)
|
Oh! My bad
I am really struggling to find a reclined photo of Qantas Domestic J. I don't think I even have one myself. This is the closest I can get. I do see where you're coming from about legroom but I am more of a width guy than a tall guy https://www.mapworld.com.au/blogs/ne...s-class-review https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/00..._2048x2048.jpg |
Originally Posted by Short hair Francis
(Post 32880166)
Good Point fakecd, they couldn't have use the BE Diamond Seat like the SQ 7M8s?
FYI: Vantage single-aisle LOPA https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...4ca7340370.jpg Render of Vantage cabin (Aer Lingus) https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...64c69ed393.jpg |
Originally Posted by clubeurope
(Post 32880293)
Singapore's installing Diamonds on their 737 max? I'm surprised they didn't go for the Vantage or that new narrow body direct aisle access seat
Originally Posted by cx4ever
(Post 32880558)
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the SQ 7M8s have the Vantage seats? Which means there are alternating rows of 2-2 and 1-1. The 1-1 throne seats therefore have 4x more table/storage space compared to the 2-2 seats. I don't like the product inconsistency and would feel annoyed paying the same price if I could only get one of the 2-2 seats.
Don't really like this new color scheme, but it matches the previous KA F (cirrus) color scheme on the A330s. Looks more comfortable than the previous generation, will have to try it to know for sure.
Originally Posted by djsflynn
(Post 32882264)
Not the Diamond: forthcoming Singapore Airlines (nee SilkAir) Boeing 787 MAX jets will use Thompson Aero's Vantage. Still lie-flat but the alternating 2-2 / 1-1 layout means it's not direct aisle access for everyone.
FYI: Vantage single-aisle LOPA https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...4ca7340370.jpg Render of Vantage cabin (Aer Lingus) https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...64c69ed393.jpg MY BAD:( CM 7M8s is using the BE Diamond, not the SQ ones. Guess the point is the same, why didn't they at least use the BE Diamonds like the AA 321T Business :mad::mad::mad: Too Bloody cheap on the Seat Pitch I guess :o |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 32880407)
Maybe I took too many regional J as redeye flights, but I would have killed for some real recline akin to Qantas domestic J or even JAL Class J over this. Not to be.
QF Domestic J has little if any recline. JL Class J does, but is a WAY tighter product than the current CX Short Haul J.
Originally Posted by clubeurope
(Post 32881732)
SriLankan’s A320 recliners has possibly got to have one of the best reclines (and legroom) I’ve ever seen. Sure this seat looks snazzy and all, but it really gives away the comfort. Unless CX commits on not flying these on longer regionals (which I doubt), it’s not much of an improvement :(
If CX was to use the UL 320 Recliner seat, I doubt none of us here will be b!tching/meh right now. Commitment in HKG, HA!!! :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: How long is that going to last until it's a Historical Document which is no longer Valid :( https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...efa2991bd4.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...793c4d77e7.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...d07f13eb6d.jpg
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 32881977)
Oh! My bad
I am really struggling to find a reclined photo of Qantas Domestic J. I don't think I even have one myself. This is the closest I can get. I do see where you're coming from about legroom but I am more of a width guy than a tall guy https://www.mapworld.com.au/blogs/ne...s-class-review https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...59627a0f3f.jpg |
Those seats seem decent enough for the short flights these A321 will be operating.
|
Can't see the need of fully flat bed on any flights shorter than 5 or 6 hours anyway.
|
Frankly I would prefer the original Barcalounger seats that were on the regional 777s and A330s above every other seat that has been thrown about here. I'm talking about the ones with manual recline and legrest extension, not the refreshed ones with electric recline that made it onto a handful of 777s. The cradle position on those seats was very comfortable IMHO, and a refresh of the upholstery, trim, and IFE system would make the seat quite appealing.
To be clear, I'm talking about these seats: https://onemileatatime.com/a380-extr...re-to-colombo/. |
Originally Posted by VE105
(Post 32882320)
Those seats seem decent enough for the short flights these A321 will be operating.
Can't see the need of fully flat bed on any flights shorter than 5 or 6 hours anyway. I've had more than a few South Asians who told me KA stinks on those flights and they go out of the way to avoid them. :o
Originally Posted by dkc192
(Post 32882384)
Frankly I would prefer the original Barcalounger seats that were on the regional 777s and A330s above every other seat that has been thrown about here. I'm talking about the ones with manual recline and legrest extension, not the refreshed ones with electric recline that made it onto a handful of 777s. The cradle position on those seats was very comfortable IMHO, and a refresh of the upholstery, trim, and IFE system would make the seat quite appealing.
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...888eabfdc2.jpg Come to think of it, that seat was pretty comfy for that time period. :) Rolling Tape IFE except If CX were to go for a modern day Barcalounger, then then the most logical seat would be the one Malindo uses. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...5b60e09416.jpg Manual Adjustment, IFE, Seat Power :) But then I would want to see Malindo prices and not Cathay prices. Otherwise, why isn't one flying with OD then... Plus who is CX competing with? Hopefully not OD ;) |
Originally Posted by Short hair Francis
(Post 32882292)
percysmith, you definitely don't want the QF Domestic J seat :(
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...59627a0f3f.jpg Something about the lumbar support of the existing slide forward CX regional J doesn't work for me. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 32882473)
That seat has at least as much recline as JL Class J, but wider.
Something about the lumbar support of the existing slide forward CX regional J doesn't work for me. Problem is how much pitch would you need to use the QF Domestic J seat on a CX 32Q? Not 37-39" I bloody hope. :mad: You can't ask for an extra pillow to fix the lumbar support? My beef with the current CX Regional J is the Ankle part is dangled way too high and sometime kills Calf blood circulation :( |
Originally Posted by VE105
(Post 32882320)
Those seats seem decent enough for the short flights these A321 will be operating.
QF flies domestically a 4-5 hour distance with flatbeds in A330s, and many american carriers also offer transcon flat-beds, from DL to B6. Seems sad for an airline often regarded by the general public to be amongst the world’s best to offer such a meagre product. |
Originally Posted by Short hair Francis
(Post 32883421)
You can't ask for an extra pillow to fix the lumbar support?
|
I really like ZH's J product on narrowbodies. It's basically the same domestic/regional J seat for all the Chinese carriers, but ZH installed 8 in the space of 12 so everyone has a giant pitch.
|
The newly release of EK PE seats does overshine the new CX regional J. Perhaps regional seats and long haul seats are just not directly comparable.
|
Originally Posted by SLGO
(Post 32920580)
The newly release of EK PE seats does overshine the new CX regional J. Perhaps regional seats and long haul seats are just not directly comparable.
|
EK PEY / CX A350 PEY >>>CX "new" regional J
based on stats and photo of hardware....that say a lot about CX |
Originally Posted by SLGO
(Post 32920580)
The newly release of EK PE seats does overshine the new CX regional J. Perhaps regional seats and long haul seats are just not directly comparable.
|
Originally Posted by SLGO
(Post 32920580)
The newly release of EK PE seats does overshine the new CX regional J. Perhaps regional seats and long haul seats are just not directly comparable.
|
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 32920859)
I'm quite certain I am going to prefer sitting in the new CX Regional J seats to the EK Premium Economy seats.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:42 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.