FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Cathay Pacific | Cathay (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay-487/)
-   -   Camera attachments no longer allowed (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay/1890828-camera-attachments-no-longer-allowed.html)

watery Jan 28, 2018 7:17 pm

Taking photos/videos of the flight experience, don't know if it's generally accepted, but I'd
  1. Avoid any other person in frame;
  2. If crowded, avoid their faces;
  3. For meal distribution where the cabin crew is in, I'd avoid their faces into frame; and not to publish their direct faces;
  4. Use a small camera/phone to not make a scene;
  5. Make my camera visible so others know I'm filming (and filming what);
  6. Be available to show and remove any image involving another person once requested.
Re suction cup thing, I do film takeoff on camera handheld (airplane mode; admit I'm not strict safety guy), and I'd understand the claim that the suction cup might loosen and fell during the takeoff/landing vibration.

1010101 Jan 29, 2018 5:17 am

It's not a privacy related matter (well it may be a secondary concern) but one of safety. In an accident the suction cup wont last long and the camera becomes a flying missile in the cabin. Anything in the cabin has to be bolted down and ferociously tested.

I cant imagine the footage being any good anyway with the amount of vibration on takeoff.

Kachjc Jan 29, 2018 5:44 pm

uh how is that any different to cutler/glassware /pens!! etc

ricktoronto Jan 31, 2018 5:41 pm


Originally Posted by windchaser777 (Post 29349937)
Obviously drones aren’t allowed to be used on board due to the fact they are remote controlled

So you could let one loose unguided and it's allowed?

synthkeys Jan 31, 2018 8:02 pm


Originally Posted by ricktoronto (Post 29364321)
So you could let one loose unguided and it's allowed?

What about my emotional support peacock? :p :p :p

ricktoronto Feb 1, 2018 8:30 pm

I was thinking the drones might be more of an issue being a one pound object going 20 mph with 4 or more spinning blades on it than the whole remote issue.

jkingsle Feb 1, 2018 8:59 pm


Originally Posted by 1010101 (Post 29352263)
It's not a privacy related matter (well it may be a secondary concern) but one of safety. In an accident the suction cup wont last long and the camera becomes a flying missile in the cabin. Anything in the cabin has to be bolted down and ferociously tested.

I cant imagine the footage being any good anyway with the amount of vibration on takeoff.

Your right the footage on landing isn't great. This is a time-lapse sequence I took on ANA on landing the NRT a few years back using the spring clamp mount on a 787.


I also did a time-lapse sequence once on CX for a first class meal, but I can't seem to find it now, as I never loaded to YouTube unfortunately.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.