FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Cathay Pacific | Cathay (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay-487/)
-   -   New KA First Class (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay/1531624-new-ka-first-class.html)

CanucksHKG Dec 16, 2013 1:25 pm

New KA First Class
 
...or aka CX's FB2 Business Class

http://theclub.cathaypacific.com/dbm...cid=CX61AE1312

http://imageserver.hk/dbm_enews/imag...216/banner.jpg

maortega15 Dec 16, 2013 2:21 pm

Don't be surprised if they use this trim and color for the next refresh of the long-haul business class! :)

Serg_2012 Dec 16, 2013 3:27 pm

Same colour scheme as the updated CX first class with a hint of DA crimson. Not bad.

SQ421 Dec 16, 2013 3:51 pm

Actually wouldn't mind seeing this colour and trim in the CX J cabin!

CX100Silver Dec 16, 2013 5:27 pm

New KA First Class
 
Is First Class really necessary for KA given only regional flight..? Even CX to Aussie dropped First long time ago...

CanucksHKG Dec 16, 2013 6:22 pm


Originally Posted by CX100Silver (Post 21977500)
Is First Class really necessary for KA given only regional flight..? Even CX to Aussie dropped First long time ago...

Why not? Realistically...it's just a J seat.

jona970318 Dec 16, 2013 7:17 pm

So, I guess this is the third variation of the successful 'worlds best business class' product after CX and AA

percysmith Dec 16, 2013 7:55 pm

Webb's whinged about it

http://webb-site.com/articles/notclassy.asp

jona970318 Dec 16, 2013 8:07 pm


Originally Posted by percysmith (Post 21978193)

Obviously that would be a more than luxurious product for a regional flight. He should probably try the 'first' class in US first before winging

QRC3288 Dec 16, 2013 8:27 pm


Originally Posted by CX100Silver (Post 21977500)
Is First Class really necessary for KA given only regional flight..? Even CX to Aussie dropped First long time ago...

Yea, it is at least from a CX economics perspective. The economics are that flights are shorter reducing fuel burn, and there are mainlanders (and HK-based travelers) willing to pay for F service on regional flights to/from China. I'm not sure if you've flown the existing KA F config, but it kinda sucks. It's actually rather uncomfortable - I prefer the big Lazy Boy chairs in J, especially if nobody is sitting in front of me. Having the CX J class now be KA's F is pretty cool. Admittedly I will rarely be paying for it, but I do think there is demand.

Aussie is (again, from economics perspective, not pax perspective), bluntly, a poor-yielding F route, hence it got dropped. Lots of competition, mid/long range (9+ hours) means more incremental fuel burn, and there just aren't enough folks willing to shell out USA-like prices for F (15k+ USD). Everything is an opportunity cost and I just don't think it's worth it for CX to send F configged planes down there. It certainly doesn't justify using an elite config like the 77H down to Oz when you probably can't price that F ticket more than 7-8k USD tops or risk having empty cabins. Even then I think you'd be pushing it, you can get J down to SYD for 4-6k USD. Competition is just too fierce and there aren't enough pax with the type of budget versus, say JFK-bound pax.

Versus KA, they've already got F configged planes, but the F class hard product kinda sucks. This will definitely be an improvement, and I bet it doesn't cost CX/KA a whole lot because they already have the seat contract with CX. Maybe the planes were going in for maintenance/refurbs anyway.

Finally, as for Webb...I really enjoy reading that guy's stuff, unfortunately that post of his was ridiculous. Embarrassing. "Title inflation". Go complain about something more substantial. FWIW, count me as a pax that is stoked that KA is using CX's J class for their F. As mentioned above, this is definitely an upgrade from KA's existing F product. I don't expect CX's F when I'm flying a 3 hour flight to PEK. What a clown.

sxc Dec 16, 2013 9:03 pm


so it is not beyond their means to use the same name for the same seat.
He should be careful what he asks for....The current CX business class could be easily renamed to CX First Class.

percysmith Dec 16, 2013 9:37 pm

Existing first - http://www.dragonair.com/ka/en_HK/tr...rst-class.html

Kachjc Dec 16, 2013 10:35 pm

CX operates first class on certain regional routes

they are unable to operate to China

of course KA needs a first class cabin!!!!

and this one looks really stylish.

rickywk Dec 17, 2013 12:51 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 21978862)
CX operates first class on certain regional routes

they are unable to operate to China

of course KA needs a first class cabin!!!!

and this one looks really stylish.

CX is operating PEK and PVG route

Kachjc Dec 17, 2013 1:29 am


Originally Posted by rickywk (Post 21979247)
CX is operating PEK and PVG route

yes but they may need more than CX first class capacity to that route than available- they are not nuts

is great KA chose a new first class instead of repeating the business class

those who dislike this drastic improvement of product can go fly China southern!!

Cathay Boy Dec 17, 2013 5:44 am

KA is currently the flight of choice for rich people in China. Offering First Class is smart because Chinese would pay for it. When KA offered itself with WNZ-HKG route this virtually destroyed China Eastern. And the J class of that route is always full when I fly it every so often.

CaptRobPhD Dec 17, 2013 8:58 am

Excellent, now all CX needs to do is drop a 330 into CNX and I can avoid BKK [and change timing; current weeBus service notwithstanding] :D Actually, with the increasing number of mainland China flights heading towards CNX, this could be a realistic possibility...

IanFromHKG Dec 17, 2013 11:06 am


Originally Posted by jona970318 (Post 21978019)
So, I guess this is the third variation of the successful 'worlds best business class' product after CX and AA

Er, no. At least the fifth. The first airline to use it was US Airways (the Envoy Suite). Also Delta: http://blog.apex.aero/cabin-interior...opnotch-seats/. CX made it famous, of course. AA were next. Air France have also decided to adopt it: http://www.ausbt.com.au/air-france-p...business-class. KA are a bit late to the party :p

jona970318 Dec 17, 2013 6:41 pm


Originally Posted by IanFromHKG (Post 21981815)
Er, no. At least the fifth. The first airline to use it was US Airways (the Envoy Suite). Also Delta: http://blog.apex.aero/cabin-interior...opnotch-seats/. CX made it famous, of course. AA were next. Air France have also decided to adopt it: http://www.ausbt.com.au/air-france-p...business-class. KA are a bit late to the party :p

I think those are similar variations, but AA and KA used the exact same hard product just with different color scheme

Kachjc Dec 17, 2013 8:09 pm


Originally Posted by IanFromHKG (Post 21981815)
Er, no. At least the fifth. The first airline to use it was US Airways (the Envoy Suite). Also Delta: http://blog.apex.aero/cabin-interior...opnotch-seats/. CX made it famous, of course. AA were next. Air France have also decided to adopt it: http://www.ausbt.com.au/air-france-p...business-class. KA are a bit late to the party :p

this seat only became famous after the CX modifications.

also because CX HAS it on the highest number of planes on earth - it is seen as CX seat by passengers (when infact US introduced it-albeit a weaker version)

i thought KA was 7- QR and EVA also have this

LHR/MEL/Europe FF Dec 17, 2013 11:05 pm


Originally Posted by QRC3288 (Post 21978334)
I'm not sure if you've flown the existing KA F config, but it kinda sucks. It's actually rather uncomfortable - I prefer the big Lazy Boy chairs in J, especially if nobody is sitting in front of me.

I'm a bit confused by this statement... the current F seat is the same width as the J offering on that aircraft, the F seat has a greater recline, and a completely horizontal leg-rest, plus the option of a 'flat bed', and of course mountains of room.

What for you makes the J seat more comfortable than the F one?

sxc Dec 17, 2013 11:12 pm


Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF (Post 21985418)
I'm a bit confused by this statement... the current F seat is the same width as the J offering on that aircraft, the F seat has a greater recline, and a completely horizontal leg-rest, plus the option of a 'flat bed', and of course mountains of room.

What for you makes the J seat more comfortable than the F one?

I don't think that the J seat is more comfortable than the old F, but just to clarify, although the seat surface is flat, it is a sloped flat seat. It is the same as the CX J class from 2002-2006.

QRC3288 Dec 17, 2013 11:48 pm


Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF (Post 21985418)
I'm a bit confused by this statement... the current F seat is the same width as the J offering on that aircraft, the F seat has a greater recline, and a completely horizontal leg-rest, plus the option of a 'flat bed', and of course mountains of room.

What for you makes the J seat more comfortable than the F one?

I guess it's all personal preferences, but the following:

1.) My back gets uncomfortable with the KA F seat, whereas it doesn't in the J lazy-boys.
2.) It is a slopey horizontal leg-rest as sxc points out above, which I don't like.
3.) Seat is not as cushioned as J. I feel like there are hard edges in the F class seat and am always kinda fidgeting around trying to get comfortable after a position gets sore.
4.) Count me as one who thinks the whole "flat bed" thing is somewhat deceptive....I actually sleep better in the KA J seat back as a recliner than the slopey KA F! I'm usually napping on KA for a few hours, and those slopey beds don't do it for me. I can't fall asleep on them. Whereas I can always fall asleep sitting upright in a comfortable recliner for a few hours. I wouldn't want a recliner for a 16 hour flight to JFK, but for an hour or two nap ex-PVG they're great.

I agree the space is nice because nobody can recline into you. For me that's the major benefit of existing F (the J seats really can get in your face if you've got someone in front, which always kinda sucks). But count me as one though who really likes CX's long-haul J, and I'm very pleased to see it going in KA F. I think it's a huge upgrade from someone who never really cared for KA's existing F. I usually don't book KA J or F, but I suppose if I really needed to work this F class might be worth it once in a while in a pinch. Versus before, I think I've only ever paid for KA F when I was on a F ticket ex-somewhere else (aka not originating in HKG). I've always contended that CX's long-haul J really is the ultimate regional seat too....I think it's a good move.

And I suppose if you're flying on those one or two mid range KA flights to India or wherever, this will be nice.

LHR/MEL/Europe FF Dec 18, 2013 12:05 am

there is a setting for the leg-rest for full flat (bed mode is angled). there was trip report recently on another forum which I'll try to find. the setting is possible because of the increased pitch.

edited to add report here: http://www.australianfrequentflyer.c...hai-55691.html

(but I agree the new seats will a welcome addition!)

IanFromHKG Dec 19, 2013 10:10 pm


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 21984718)
this seat only became famous after the CX modifications

Er... Yes, I know. That's why I said "CX made it famous, of course". So I'm not quite sure what you were trying to add there...

IanFromHKG Dec 19, 2013 10:14 pm


Originally Posted by jona970318 (Post 21984310)
I think those are similar variations, but AA and KA used the exact same hard product just with different color scheme

Actually, they aren't exactly the same. To give just one example, according to their website, the KA seat has a bed extension (like the CX J seat), but the AA seat (which I have tried) doesn't. No doubt there are other differences too

Amelorn Dec 20, 2013 12:52 am

If a market exists, why not bilk them?

oldyjiang Dec 31, 2013 1:44 am


Originally Posted by jona970318 (Post 21978247)
Obviously that would be a more than luxurious product for a regional flight. He should probably try the 'first' class in US first before winging

Obviously you're missing his point. He's not doing a seat comparison between US airlines and Asian airlines. He's not comparing the old First Class seat and the new First Class seat. Webb's point is completely valid - the first class seat (and first class pricing) is a CX business class seat with new covering - it is NOT a first class seat. I had the same reaction as him when I saw it.

IanFromHKG Dec 31, 2013 2:50 am


Originally Posted by oldyjiang (Post 22054922)
Obviously you're missing his point. He's not doing a seat comparison between US airlines and Asian airlines. He's not comparing the old First Class seat and the new First Class seat. Webb's point is completely valid - the first class seat (and first class pricing) is a CX business class seat with new covering - it is NOT a first class seat. I had the same reaction as him when I saw it.

The Cirrus seat was originally marketed by its manufacturer as a first class seat. It is being used by AA as a first class seat on its (three-class) transcontinental services. So you can't legitimately claim that it isn't a first class seat, just because some long-haul airlines also use it as a business class seat.

You also need to bear in mind KA is a regional airline. With very limited exceptions (such as BLR, which may be switched to CX anyway) its flights are primarily short-haul, and at most are medium-haul. For that length flight, this is perfectly appropriate as a first class seat, IMHO.

cxauhk Dec 31, 2013 4:00 am

New KA First Class
 
I would think this: given KA's new J seems in the pictures to be CX's new regional J (I haven't been on KA's new J yet, so happy to be corrected), then having CX's long haul J product for F seems to be reasonable because it is a step up, as it offers lie flat and more personal space.

brunos Dec 31, 2013 4:06 am


Originally Posted by jona970318 (Post 21978019)
So, I guess this is the third variation of the successful 'worlds best business class' product after CX and AA

US was first in using these seats.

NA-Flyer Dec 31, 2013 4:15 am


Originally Posted by IanFromHKG (Post 21981815)
Air France have also decided to adopt it: http://www.ausbt.com.au/air-france-p...business-class.

AF will have an edge over other european airlines (BA+LH+LX) if these seats to be installed ^

Kachjc Dec 31, 2013 9:13 am


Originally Posted by oldyjiang (Post 22054922)
Obviously you're missing his point. He's not doing a seat comparison between US airlines and Asian airlines. He's not comparing the old First Class seat and the new First Class seat. Webb's point is completely valid - the first class seat (and first class pricing) is a CX business class seat with new covering - it is NOT a first class seat. I had the same reaction as him when I saw it.

CX also uses those seats for LONG-HAUL routes

KA uses it for SHORT-HAUL routes

hardly any confusion or sneakiness there.

ithe KA first class seat is now the top short haul dedicated first class seat on earth.

if Mr Webb would like lower standards and a simple recline seat like the rest- he should zip it and fly mainland airlines!!!

seriously- even when KA/CX improve their product to the top people complain.....

cxfan1960 Dec 31, 2013 10:50 am


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 22056391)
CX also uses those seats for LONG-HAUL routes

CX uses this type of seats for long haul business class only.


Originally Posted by Kachjc (Post 22056391)
seriously- even when KA/CX improve their product to the top people complain.....

:D

zhaobao Jan 2, 2014 11:02 pm

There is of course the rotation of aircraft and hence you may see long-haul business class seats show up with say the flights to/from Manila.

Has any airline solved the issue of the persons sitting in D/K seeing the TV screens of the neighbours if the TV screen is lodged in the original position ?

rendezvous Jan 8, 2014 6:33 pm

According to wikipedia, KA only has 6 a330s with a first class cabin, so the retrofit should be a fairly quick process, right? Maybe 2 or 3 months?

maortega15 Jan 8, 2014 7:25 pm


Originally Posted by rendezvous (Post 22114601)
According to wikipedia, KA only has 6 a330s with a first class cabin, so the retrofit should be a fairly quick process, right? Maybe 2 or 3 months?

Retrofit + a D-check = A month or so per plane.

maortega15 Jan 8, 2014 7:27 pm

And since this thread has been bumped
 
Who updates this page?:
http://www.flyerguide.com/wiki/index...air_(KA)_Fleet

Not sure why The new First class has not been added. :confused:

sxc Jan 8, 2014 7:28 pm


Originally Posted by maortega15 (Post 22114843)
Retrofit + a D-check = A month or so per plane.

Plus all the planes might not be due a D-check sequentially.

maortega15 Jan 8, 2014 7:37 pm


Originally Posted by sxc (Post 22114851)
Plus all the planes might not be due a D-check sequentially.

It would still take a month or so regardless.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:11 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.