BA Upgrades in the Register of Members' Interests
With the increasing level of disclosure that now appears to be required by MP's of their interests, I was perusing the latest edition of the register and came across these rather bizarre entries by David Cameron and Menzies Campbell:
CAMERON, Rt Hon David (Witney) 5. Gifts, benefits and hospitality (UK) 29 November 2007, I received a first class upgrade, as part of a promotional offer from British Airways, on a flight from Washington DC to London (paid for by the Conservative Party). (Registered 7 December 2007) CAMPBELL, Rt. Hon. Sir Menzies (North East Fife) 5. Gifts, benefits and hospitality (UK) 15 February 2007, on the return flight from a visit to the USA made in my capacity as Chancellor of St Andrew's University, I received an upgrade from Business to First Class from British Airways. (Registered 28 February 2007) The first sounds like the recent "upgrade one way to FIRST" deal that BA ran. The second sounds like an op-up. Does anyone else think that either of the above should be entered on the Register of Members' Interests? I must say I find it very curious. |
From what I see, Cameron's upgrade need not have been disclosed (as it was part of the fare promo) but Campbell's should have been disclosed as it was an op-up.
Now the pertinent question is, why didn't the Tory party buy an I fare instead of the J2BA / other J fare they bought for Dave! :D |
Originally Posted by PhilH
(Post 9080329)
With the increasing level of disclosure that now appears to be required by MP's of their interests, I was perusing the latest edition of the register and came across these rather bizarre entries by David Cameron and Menzies Campbell:
http://www.publications.parliament.u...109/memi06.htm The first sounds like the recent "upgrade one way to FIRST" deal that BA ran. The second sounds like an op-up. Does anyone else think that either of the above should be entered on the Register of Members' Interests? I must say I find it very curious. I think it's ridiculous that they should enter such information regarding upgrades/promo as it has no monetary value in regards to taxpayers money. I think they just do it to show off! ;) |
Originally Posted by jonnye
(Post 9080406)
I'm HOOKED!!! i swear i could spend all day reading this stuff, its hilarious!
I think it's ridiculous that they should enter such information regarding upgrades/promo as it has no monetary value in regards to taxpayers money. I think they just do it to show off! ;) Can you imagine if one of the FT regulars had to do this much disclosure to their company? The auditors would have a field day? So Mr Smith, we notice you fly mostly out of Linate, yet you live half an hour's drive from Heathrow. Is there a particular reason for this? |
Originally Posted by jonnye
(Post 9080406)
I think it's ridiculous that they should enter such information regarding upgrades/promo as it has no monetary value in regards to taxpayers money. I think they just do it to show off! ;)
|
Originally Posted by MileHighLawyer
(Post 9081298)
hahahhaha
Can you imagine if one of the FT regulars had to do this much disclosure to their company? The auditors would have a field day? So Mr Smith, we notice you fly mostly out of Linate, yet you live half an hour's drive from Heathrow. Is there a particular reason for this? |
Originally Posted by PhilH
(Post 9080329)
Does anyone else think that either of the above should be entered on the Register of Members' Interests? I must say I find it very curious.
|
Ah, transparency. :rolleyes:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:26 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.