IAG Quarter 3 2017 results - good performance
#91
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, TK Elite, HHonors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 7,691
Thanks for being polite, unlike some of the others, who cannot accept any other opinion other than theirs. I think LHR is unique though as a major hub as it is running at 98% capacity with the 2 runways, so expansion is pretty much impossible right now, thus helping BA's cause very much.
And to the other posters calling me uninformed and disagreeing, perhaps it is time you stopped looking at the share price and seeing passenger's opinions? After all, I am just a passenger who flies BA from time to time. Or does BA not care about making its passengers happy anymore, and just wants to increase profits? That really sounds short term to me.
http://www.airlinequality.com/airlin...itish-airways/
And to the other posters calling me uninformed and disagreeing, perhaps it is time you stopped looking at the share price and seeing passenger's opinions? After all, I am just a passenger who flies BA from time to time. Or does BA not care about making its passengers happy anymore, and just wants to increase profits? That really sounds short term to me.
http://www.airlinequality.com/airlin...itish-airways/
#92
Join Date: Jun 2003
Programs: BA, IHG, 5C
Posts: 4,413
#94
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Ok if you love your share prices so much lets go basic.
IAG share price - > from 434 to 634 in 1 year, a percentage increase of 46%.
LH share price - > from 11.65 to 27.38 in 1 year, a percentage increase of 135%.
AF share price -> 5.56 to 13.32 in 1 year, a percentage increase of 140%.
So in the past year or so ( is it a coincidence it is around the time BOB was introduced) which airline has done better for its investors?
Good performance is relative when you compare it to your competitors.
IAG share price - > from 434 to 634 in 1 year, a percentage increase of 46%.
LH share price - > from 11.65 to 27.38 in 1 year, a percentage increase of 135%.
AF share price -> 5.56 to 13.32 in 1 year, a percentage increase of 140%.
So in the past year or so ( is it a coincidence it is around the time BOB was introduced) which airline has done better for its investors?
Good performance is relative when you compare it to your competitors.
Sorry it's inconvenient for you....
#96
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
Looking at my figures I posted in the last post, it seems Alex Cruz and of course, overall Willie Walsh ( i blame him most as he put Alex Cruz there anyway) are underperforming as a CEO's compared to their competition. I wonder if Qatar Airways (they are at 20% now?) buys more shares and put Akbar Al Baker as CEO of IAG. Now that would make things interesting!
Stay close to your phone.
#97
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OSL
Posts: 2,649
Looking at my figures I posted in the last post, it seems Alex Cruz and of course, overall Willie Walsh ( i blame him most as he put Alex Cruz there anyway) are underperforming as a CEO's compared to their competition. I wonder if Qatar Airways (they are at 20% now?) buys more shares and put Akbar Al Baker as CEO of IAG. Now that would make things interesting!
IAG has had a permium valuation for a while now as measured by most metrics. AFKLM has been the worst. In the same period, over 5 years AF has performed less well than IAG (on both relative and growth metrics), whilst in the last year AF has performed well. Thus when coming off an all time low share price, growth will seem larger as in AFKLM. And there is a limit to have much higher IAG profits can actually grow without growing the top line (in actual terms), AFKLM has a lot more opportunity to cut fat. Thus higher profits, thus happier shareholders. And in most sectors top performers can only be so much higher than the average, but of course outliers exists. I’d argue in a capital intensive industry that will usually not be the case.
#98
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DEL
Programs: Mucci du Miel d'Or
Posts: 2,377
Thank you. I can see how it could read and perhaps I should have said 'clearly complimentary catering is important to you...', but the poster I was replying to did use the term 'free stuff' and it seemed appropriate to use the term they offered.
It annoys me too when people are unnecessarily rude, but I always wonder if these things are best left to the mods. They do a good job and I find it's difficult to intervene without escalating the tone or without coming across as high-handed or pompous.
It annoys me too when people are unnecessarily rude, but I always wonder if these things are best left to the mods. They do a good job and I find it's difficult to intervene without escalating the tone or without coming across as high-handed or pompous.
#99
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,214
#100
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DEL
Programs: Mucci du Miel d'Or
Posts: 2,377
Some of the airlines you cite have cut complimentary catering in other ways. LH made a significant cut by shifting non-FRA/MUC hub flying to EW. AF are replacing full onboard service on a number of routes that will shift to Joon; as I said if that works well, I can see AF trialling the service model more widely.
#101
Well I think that's what we're discussing. As you know, I think BoB is here to stay in some form. I think it's the inevitable direction Y travel in Europe is going. There is a similar list of EU airlines that have already made the jump to BoB in some form: SK, AY, BA, EI, IB, although BA is the biggest legacy player to have made the jump.
Some of the airlines you cite have cut complimentary catering in other ways. LH made a significant cut by shifting non-FRA/MUC hub flying to EW. AF are replacing full onboard service on a number of routes that will shift to Joon; as I said if that works well, I can see AF trialling the service model more widely.
Some of the airlines you cite have cut complimentary catering in other ways. LH made a significant cut by shifting non-FRA/MUC hub flying to EW. AF are replacing full onboard service on a number of routes that will shift to Joon; as I said if that works well, I can see AF trialling the service model more widely.
Then AF is just out of a phase where they enhance (positivelly) their on-board catering following years of cost cutting leading to poor financial performances. I do not see them suddenly turning 180 degrees.