Community
Wiki Posts
Search

why travel BA Y when AA Y has MCE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:05 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by Skipcool3
Don't forget no EU rights on USA-UK flights on AA
A few years ago returned from JFK in bad weather, BA put us up in a hotel for a couple of nights. Friends on AA had to fend for themselves which was costly.....
What are you talking about?
Of course they have EU rights! It's a flight to EU!
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:05 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,228
I don't disagree that if you're paying for MCE seats then it can be costly: AA100 JFK - LHR has them priced from $137 to $149 per seat. However, to reiterate the point I made above I would still choose AA MCE over BA WT as I think it's generally a better seat. I would also choose the 77W over the 747 if flying in economy.

In terms of BA charging for seat selection, I was under the impression that all classes of travel (except First) had the potential for advance seat selection for a fee - from extra legroom seats, to pairs of seats, to individual seats. Then again, I may be wrong.
Geordie405 is online now  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:15 pm
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,095
The economy seats on the super J B744 are the best economy seats on any of our aircraft.
Can I help you is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:15 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, TK Elite, HHonors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 7,691
Originally Posted by Beltway2A
Status level determines when someone can get MCE for free (from booking for OWE/OWS, to check-in for OWR and never for non-status pax). Even then, it's a few bucks for some very decent legroom. If one chooses to select their seat ahead of time, which involves a fee for non-status pax on both airlines, MCE is a very compelling choice.
Neither BA, nor AA charges for seats during OLCI for regular economy seats. BA charges for seats when people want to select them in advance (for example, to guarantee that they sit together or to be at the front of the cabin). AA has a separate section within the economy section - MCE - where seats are paid for unless one holds status or is travelling on a full fare ticket. AA also charges for 'preferred' seats within the standard economy section. One does not have to pay anything to select a seat on BA if one waits until OLCI opens, but one does have to pay something to sit in MCE. BA charges US$30 to select a seat in WT (which one does not have to pay), while MCE starts from US$ 130 (a few bucks) on AA. One can pay a 'few more bucks' and upgrade to a proper premium economy cabin on BA. Now, I do not want to decide what is or is not small change for other people, but I think the discussion would be more honest and fairer if people used actual figures for the purposes of comparison and did not only bring the arguments that help their case. For example - why would anyone fly BA in regular economy if for only US$130 one way you can fly in MCE on AA? A 'few bucks' mean different things to different people.

Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
It's a flight to EU!
Which is why only passengers on Community carriers are covered. AA passengers are covered only on flights from the EU.
Andriyko is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:19 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, Eurostar Carte Blanche
Posts: 712
Originally Posted by HIDDY
There's always a catch.
Indeed. American can't brew a good cup of tea.
World Traveller Fuss is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:19 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Programs: AA
Posts: 14,736
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
What are you talking about?
Of course they have EU rights! It's a flight to EU!
EU261 only applies to AA when flying from the EU. But as AA is not a European community carrier, EU261 does not apply to AA when flying to the EU, unlike BA where it applies both directions.
wrp96 is online now  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:20 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAEC Silver, IHG Diamond
Posts: 7,770
If i had to pay $130 for a MCE seat, i would more realistically be looking at a WT to WT+ upgrade on BA for little more and perhaps the lure of TPs and extra Avios might sway it.

Does AA let you sit in these for free after boarding?
Noticed that some seat shifting does occur on BA especially if you've a lovely bulkhead seat pair to yourself someone suddenly jumps on there after the "boarding is complete" announcement.
xenole is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:23 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lewes
Programs: HiltonH. Gold Starwood Gold BA BLUES! Mucci.
Posts: 4,833
Ahmetdouas, as a poster here for many years, and having worked at Gatwick, LHR and Stansted, you will understand that I do know what I am talking about.....
Skipcool3 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:23 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, TK Elite, HHonors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 7,691
Originally Posted by xenole
If i had to pay $130 for a MCE seat, i would more realistically be looking at a WT to WT+ upgrade on BA for little more and perhaps the lure of TPs and extra Avios might sway it.
That's what I would do as well. Many people would stick with the regular economy though. But this kind of changes the perspective, does not it?
Andriyko is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:25 pm
  #40  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,477
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
What are you talking about?
Of course they have EU rights! It's a flight to EU!
No, only flights originating in the EU count for non-Community carriers.

If that's the balance, you'd have to take into account MCE and TSA Pre-Check for those who are eligible - which will be a small subset of passengers. In the time EC261 has existed I've had only one instance when it would have applied - both in terms of delay compensation and duty of care. FR charges a minuscule amount in their fares to cover their expected costs. Based on those two premises, and given US airlines will generally provide some duty of care for mechanical issues, it's a reasonable bet that the benefits on AA for status holders in Y will outweigh the risks.

For non-status holders who don't want to buy up to MCE the balance may well be the other way.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 12:35 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAEC Silver, IHG Diamond
Posts: 7,770
I personally wouldn't pay for seat selection on any airline.
If I end up with something bad, I'll try and suck it up and think about how much I've saved and the benefits at my destination.
Yes I'll use my status to hopefully grab the best of the bunch but up to now, I've been pretty lucky in getting good seats on various airlines on which i am statusless.

At the end of the day, it's all about what suits me.
A highish price differential and I'll fly AA over BA.
Similar and I'll look at merits of each, check seat maps to see if it's worth looking for a paid upgrade (could only be middle WT+ seats compared to a nice spacious bulkhead), how many TPs I require, whether there's a chance of an upgrade to CW and so on.

Have found that AA are slightly more likely to oversell a flight which could mean the chance of a transportation voucher (said before, they did it awhile ago out of JFK and were offering a hotel + meals, flight next day and a $1000 transportation voucher).
But as with everything, no guarantees anywhere and hoping for EU261 could be appealing to some.
xenole is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2017, 2:09 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Silver, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold, Melia Gold, Shangri-La Jade, BA Amex PP, Iberia+, Nandos Card
Posts: 1,523
Originally Posted by claptonalex
seems like much better option if travelling economy to take AA over BA as it's almost as good as WTP?
This is a real stretch. On the overall thread title point, I agree it makes sense to go AA MCE if you are in the back.
obduro is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 6:29 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Programs: AA EXP, UA GLD, Bonvoy Titan, HH Dia, WoH Exp
Posts: 2,673
Originally Posted by Andriyko
They are different seats and different cabins. Premium Economy 38" pitch and 21" width, while MCE has 34" pitch and about 18" width. Food, drinks, amenities - everything is better in PE/WTP than MCE (especially on AA as it charges for most drinks, and people here love their free drinks). I would choose AA for MCE when flying in economy if the schedule/routing suits me of course, but do not forget that MCE are free only for elites and full fare economy ticket holders. But MCE is nowhere near WTP, and I would not even consider the former if I have a budget for the latter.
https://www.aa.com/i18n/travel-info/...nes/planes.jsp

As per AA's website, MCE has 36" pitch on the 77W and 35-36" on their 772, 788 and 763 planes, which is quite generous for any long-haul flight in Y, as long as you have OWE/OWS status or pay a little extra for the MCE seats.

I think if the airfare was similar for BA WTP and AA MCE, then WTP definitely has an advantage. However when comparing BA WT and AA MCE airfare, it is hard to not give the thumbs up to AA MCE.
Time traveller is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 6:36 am
  #44  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TPA/ABZ
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold. GGL/CCR.
Posts: 13,248
Originally Posted by TheDapperDon
I'm trying to use Avios to book on American metal. Shouldn't I be using AA.com to check availability?
You may use AA.com to search for Avios availability. Make sure you look only for MilesAAver awards as these are the ones that are bookable with Avios on BA.com or by calling BA.
golfmad is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2017, 6:43 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, TK Elite, HHonors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 7,691
Originally Posted by Time traveller
As per AA's website, MCE has 36" pitch on the 77W and 35-36" on their 772, 788 and 763 planes, which is quite generous for any long-haul flight in Y, as long as you have OWE/OWS status or pay a little extra for the MCE seats.

I think if the airfare was similar for BA WTP and AA MCE, then WTP definitely has an advantage. However when comparing BA WT and AA MCE airfare, it is hard to not give the thumbs up to AA MCE.
No one was arguing with the obvious fact that a MCE seat is better than the regular economy seat in terms of legroom when the cost is the same (which it will be for status holders but for others it won't be a 'little extra'.). If I am not mistaken, WT on all BA planes is currently 9 abreast, while it is 10 on AA (772 and 77W), which in MCE brings you to BA's 9 in economy. So, in effect, MCE only gives you more legroom, but the same lousy food and paid for (most) alcoholic drinks.

Last edited by Andriyko; Apr 21, 2017 at 7:03 am
Andriyko is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.