Which Lounge at Newark?
#2
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tokyo
Programs: Marriott Plat, HH G,Hyatt E,*A Gold, OW Emerald.
Posts: 3,023
In terminal B, you can use either the SAS lounge or the Lufthansa Senator lounge.
You can also try to use the United Polaris lounge in terminal C, but it is a trek to do the terminal change from B to C (and back)
You can also try to use the United Polaris lounge in terminal C, but it is a trek to do the terminal change from B to C (and back)
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,509
#4
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Correct and just to clarify what is meant by long-haul per UA's website:
Long-haul international flights include those from the U.S. to Asia, Australia, Europe and select South American countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Peru
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: SQ *Gold
Posts: 871
Thanks! Its a routing to Ecuador, so the plan is either to depart out of Newark and hub in San Salvador or go out of JFK and hub in Bogota. Newark is much closer to us (half an hour drive) versus 1-2 hours to JFK, but JFK would be a few hundred bucks cheaper which would more than cover the car service costs and the timings are a bit better. Both are on A319/20s so no seat advantage to either.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Thanks! Its a routing to Ecuador, so the plan is either to depart out of Newark and hub in San Salvador or go out of JFK and hub in Bogota. Newark is much closer to us (half an hour drive) versus 1-2 hours to JFK, but JFK would be a few hundred bucks cheaper which would more than cover the car service costs.
- Air India Maharaja Business lounge - (Near Gate 5 on 4th floor - take stairs/elevator)
- Swiss Business Class lounge - turn right, right after security
I'll leave it to the more experienced travellers to weigh the merits of JFK vs EWR.
Safe Travels,
James
Last edited by FlyerTalker70; May 20, 2019 at 8:06 am Reason: Final edit... I promise :p
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: SQ *Gold
Posts: 871
I opted for the JFK via BOG routing in the end. Mainly because the times were a bit better in terms of departure and arrivals. The return flight is also on the A330 which has angled lie-flats instead of the narrow-body cradle seats in Business which we would have gotten coming into EWR. When we went to Peru last year, we flew Avianca out of JFK, so we're essentially doing the same thing this time. On both these trips Avianca has been offering business class for about $1,100 which I think is a great price to get to South America.
Unfortunately, the Swiss lounge in JFK T4 (which I've tried several times - it's also SQs Business Class Lounge) is quite basic and disappointing. It always surprises me that Swiss hasn't invested some proper money into a lounge for what must be one of their flagship routes!
Unfortunately, the Swiss lounge in JFK T4 (which I've tried several times - it's also SQs Business Class Lounge) is quite basic and disappointing. It always surprises me that Swiss hasn't invested some proper money into a lounge for what must be one of their flagship routes!
#9
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
I opted for the JFK via BOG routing in the end. Mainly because the times were a bit better in terms of departure and arrivals. The return flight is also on the A330 which has angled lie-flats instead of the narrow-body cradle seats in Business which we would have gotten coming into EWR. When we went to Peru last year, we flew Avianca out of JFK, so we're essentially doing the same thing this time. On both these trips Avianca has been offering business class for about $1,100 which I think is a great price to get to South America.
Unfortunately, the Swiss lounge in JFK T4 (which I've tried several times - it's also SQs Business Class Lounge) is quite basic and disappointing. It always surprises me that Swiss hasn't invested some proper money into a lounge for what must be one of their flagship routes!
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,509
#11
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
This is news to me! Having been to the Krisflyer Gold lounge at SIN in December, I looked everywhere around that darn lounge and couldn't find it. I saw a small business centre, buffet area and seating, heck even a shirt press machine but no restroom! In any event, the point I'm trying to make here is that airline lounges can be very hit or miss. For most airlines the their hub airport has the best lounge and everything else goes downhill from there. Even then, the flagship hubs sometimes don't even have the best lounge in their network (i.e. UA).
In the case of OP, the LH Group of airlines operates several lounges throughout the US including EWR, JFK, IAD, DTW and BOS. If we include LH Group member LX into the mix then we also add ORD. Not only must they maintain this lounge for their J customers on their flagship routes, but they must also let bums like me in who are flying in Y on a UA domestic flight . Meanwhile, if we cross the Atlantic and visit the LH lounge @ LHR we see that it's quite a nice lounge which includes a proper business centre, ample food and seating and a properly segregated Business and Senator section. Part of the reason I think LH maintains such a nice lounge there in spite of there being 3 other equally nice lounges from AC, UA and SQ is that they have significantly more lift coming out of LHR than any of the US airports.
In the case of OP, the LH Group of airlines operates several lounges throughout the US including EWR, JFK, IAD, DTW and BOS. If we include LH Group member LX into the mix then we also add ORD. Not only must they maintain this lounge for their J customers on their flagship routes, but they must also let bums like me in who are flying in Y on a UA domestic flight . Meanwhile, if we cross the Atlantic and visit the LH lounge @ LHR we see that it's quite a nice lounge which includes a proper business centre, ample food and seating and a properly segregated Business and Senator section. Part of the reason I think LH maintains such a nice lounge there in spite of there being 3 other equally nice lounges from AC, UA and SQ is that they have significantly more lift coming out of LHR than any of the US airports.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,509
This is news to me! Having been to the Krisflyer Gold lounge at SIN in December, I looked everywhere around that darn lounge and couldn't find it. I saw a small business centre, buffet area and seating, heck even a shirt press machine but no restroom! In any event, the point I'm trying to make here is that airline lounges can be very hit or miss. For most airlines the their hub airport has the best lounge and everything else goes downhill from there. Even then, the flagship hubs sometimes don't even have the best lounge in their network (i.e. UA).
Also quite basic and nowhere representative of flagship. Wait, ZRH<->ORD is a flagship route for LX?
#14
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
So you have personally been to the KrisFlyer Gold lounge at SIN and have seen the restrooms in person? This is the lounge that is available to *A Gold flyers flying on cheap K fares on UA like myself I have and couldn't find it anywhere and the *A lounge finder does not list that any of the KrisFlyer Gold lounges provide restrooms:
Meanwhile at the SQ Business lounge they offer both restrooms and showers:
Go figure!
If anything, I'd argue that ZRH <> ORD would be the flagship based on how frequently they fly (twice) there everyday and equipment used (A330 and 777):
Meanwhile, out of JFK they're running twice daily on an A330:
I'm not much of an AVGeek but suspect that a route served by a 777 and an A330 trumps one served by two A330s.
Sure you could argue that they also operate out of EWR, but that's a separate airport with different facilities (and additional requirements) and they only run that flight which is supposed to connect to all UA domestic flights (via EWR) once a day:
Meanwhile at the SQ Business lounge they offer both restrooms and showers:
Go figure!
Meanwhile, out of JFK they're running twice daily on an A330:
I'm not much of an AVGeek but suspect that a route served by a 777 and an A330 trumps one served by two A330s.
Sure you could argue that they also operate out of EWR, but that's a separate airport with different facilities (and additional requirements) and they only run that flight which is supposed to connect to all UA domestic flights (via EWR) once a day:
#15
Moderator: Avianca, Travel Photography, Travel Technology & USA
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Far western edge of the La-La Land City limits
Programs: Emeritus VIP Fromins Deli Encino grandfathered successor program - UA MM & HH Diamond
Posts: 3,729
Let's stay on topic ***
The restroom status at a lounge in SIN, does not help EWR visitors. Thanks