Originally Posted by dw
(Post 35427671)
Not that it makes a huge difference, but I think Japan is up to 4 daily now?
- 2 LAX-HND - 1 DFW-HND - 1 DFW-NRT I'm just thinking that if AA isn't planning to bring its Japan flying back to prepandemic levels, a market they served decently for the last few decades, restoring service to the more recently added destinations like HKG seems less likely. |
With a shortage of AA widebody frames, it's anyone's guess (although United seems to be happy with their SFO-HKG loads) so *IF* American succeeds in freeing up a pair (can't come from the seasonal European flying ones unless it's from a to be discontinued route) and can justify the costs with some cargo, they'd still have to staff up locally to support a single daily or 5x weekly.
Where previously low margin routes like this might have been viewed as necessary to be competitive, today's more cost discipline/easy fruit focus may mean that there isn't a lot of appetite for low margin, high cost hauls like this to come back until pax numbers really return for that market. HKG is still significantly depressed when it comes to pre-covid passenger numbers. |
Originally Posted by enpremiere
(Post 35427864)
With a shortage of AA widebody frames, it's anyone's guess (although United seems to be happy with their SFO-HKG loads) so *IF* American succeeds in freeing up a pair (can't come from the seasonal European flying ones unless it's from a to be discontinued route) and can justify the costs with some cargo, they'd still have to staff up locally to support a single daily or 5x weekly.
Where previously low margin routes like this might have been viewed as necessary to be competitive, today's more cost discipline/easy fruit focus may mean that there isn't a lot of appetite for low margin, high cost hauls like this to come back until pax numbers really return for that market. HKG is still significantly depressed when it comes to pre-covid passenger numbers. |
Originally Posted by enpremiere
(Post 35427864)
With a shortage of AA widebody frames, it's anyone's guess (although United seems to be happy with their SFO-HKG loads) so *IF* American succeeds in freeing up a pair (can't come from the seasonal European flying ones unless it's from a to be discontinued route) and can justify the costs with some cargo, they'd still have to staff up locally to support a single daily or 5x weekly.
Where previously low margin routes like this might have been viewed as necessary to be competitive, today's more cost discipline/easy fruit focus may mean that there isn't a lot of appetite for low margin, high cost hauls like this to come back until pax numbers really return for that market. HKG is still significantly depressed when it comes to pre-covid passenger numbers. LAX-HKG, OTOH, has always been quite leisure oriented and probably lower margin |
Originally Posted by Antarius
(Post 35427878)
Meanwhile, AA has 15 a332s sitting around that they're still paying for.
|
Why would they crank up this costly route that requires 2x active 77Ws when they could just send another single 77W to LHR from some other US hub? 🤦🏻♂️
|
Originally Posted by dml105
(Post 35428239)
but do they have any 332 drivers, mechanics, spares, etc?
despite Alan Joyce flat out saying that it's cheaper to fly 2 789s back to back than one a380, they pulled that lumbering dinosaur out and started to fly it until projedt sunrise and new deliveries come along. Other airlines have similarly returned to service aircraft for the short term to tide over the rebound in travel. Only AA retired a chunk of their fleet and are now standing looking stupid while everyone else is ramping up capacity. Heck, airlines are wet and dry leasing aircraft all over the place. |
I'd like to see AA bring back a HKG route. Either DFW or LAX. Who knows, maybe they'll try SEA as it's their new supposed Pacific gateway.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:19 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.