Alaska upgraded an non-revenue employee before me
#16
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AS MVPG, 1MM
Posts: 377
The contract states that only deadheading pilots flying for greater than 5 hours (Hawaii, East Coast) get a first class seat. Other than that they “may” be assigned after all upgrades are complete. I don’t think any of us know who the “pilot” was or who he was employed by but if it was an AS pilot this would be a violation. My guess...and only a guess.. was that he may have been a pilot from another airline and on a paid fare.
#18
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
James
#19
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: ANC
Programs: AS MVP, Club 49, Global Entry, National Emerald Club, Hilton Silver
Posts: 1,400
#20
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: fwp blood diamond, dykwia uranium
Posts: 7,251
An employee entitled to first class seat? I fly a lot, and have never seen an uniformed employee get upgraded to first ahead of revenue passengers.
I have seen pilots being sandwiched in middle seats on United Airlines frequently, and they can't even displace seated passengers now due to the Dr. Dao incident.
I have seen pilots being sandwiched in middle seats on United Airlines frequently, and they can't even displace seated passengers now due to the Dr. Dao incident.
1) non ua employees deadheading or commuting
2) ua employees commuting from base to home
3) on leisure travel, where it states in the policy they must be in uniform (only example of this i can think of are UPS pilots flying on OAL passes, but this was a while back).
further, generally speaking, non-leisure non-revenue pax CAN displace seated pax, but they cannot displace seated pax in an involuntary manner.
The contract states that only deadheading pilots flying for greater than 5 hours (Hawaii, East Coast) get a first class seat. Other than that they “may” be assigned after all upgrades are complete. I don’t think any of us know who the “pilot” was or who he was employed by but if it was an AS pilot this would be a violation. My guess...and only a guess.. was that he may have been a pilot from another airline and on a paid fare.
Last edited by cur; Feb 6, 2019 at 9:55 am
#21
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks for all the responses. I see that most of you give the benefit of the doubt to the airline, and assume that the employee must be a pilot deadheading to Seattle. While I now understand such a possibility exists, I still think such a lack-of-transparency policy is subject to abuse. I guess we will never really know what actually happened:
- The airline had a week to investigate, and all they gave me was a poor excuse about two of us traveling together. They could've upgraded the 3rd guy on the upgrade list, if that was indeed the issue.
- And if the employee was indeed deadheading, a simple explanation with rules governing such cases would've resolved all my concerns. Why didn't they do that?
- This employee showed up on the stand-by list just like everyone else, with name only, and no additional annotation that he's a privileged stand-by.
- If the airline had purchased a first class ticket, he would've just been assigned that seat, and not show up in stand-by list?
- While I don't want to accuse anyone of upgrading the employee because some personal relationship without some sort of proof, I still think the possibility is just as high as deadheading.
#22
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AS MVPG, 1MM
Posts: 377
yes, it is in the contracts of some mainline carriers, at least in north america. the anecdote you bring up, pilots on ua in middle seats, could have been:
1) non ua employees deadheading or commuting
2) ua employees commuting from base to home
3) on leisure travel, where it states in the policy they must be in uniform (only example of this i can think of are UPS pilots flying on OAL passes, but this was a while back).
further, generally speaking, non-leisure non-revenue pax CAN displace seated pax, but they cannot displace seated pax in an involuntary manner.
they deadhead pilots after hawaii flights? that's crazy inefficient, unless i guess they need that crew to be at another or home base for a startup flight the next day. and isn't that considered flying time?
1) non ua employees deadheading or commuting
2) ua employees commuting from base to home
3) on leisure travel, where it states in the policy they must be in uniform (only example of this i can think of are UPS pilots flying on OAL passes, but this was a while back).
further, generally speaking, non-leisure non-revenue pax CAN displace seated pax, but they cannot displace seated pax in an involuntary manner.
they deadhead pilots after hawaii flights? that's crazy inefficient, unless i guess they need that crew to be at another or home base for a startup flight the next day. and isn't that considered flying time?
#23
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: AS MVPG, 1MM
Posts: 377
Thanks for all the responses. I see that most of you give the benefit of the doubt to the airline, and assume that the employee must be a pilot deadheading to Seattle. While I now understand such a possibility exists, I still think such a lack-of-transparency policy is subject to abuse. I guess we will never really know what actually happened:
- The airline had a week to investigate, and all they gave me was a poor excuse about two of us traveling together. They could've upgraded the 3rd guy on the upgrade list, if that was indeed the issue.
- And if the employee was indeed deadheading, a simple explanation with rules governing such cases would've resolved all my concerns. Why didn't they do that?
- This employee showed up on the stand-by list just like everyone else, with name only, and no additional annotation that he's a privileged stand-by.
- If the airline had purchased a first class ticket, he would've just been assigned that seat, and not show up in stand-by list?
- While I don't want to accuse anyone of upgrading the employee because some personal relationship without some sort of proof, I still think the possibility is just as high as deadheading.
#24
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 40
While we sat in the first row of economy, I wasn't close enough to read his badge or tell for sure whether he works for the airlines. As I recall, he had a employee dress shirt, with tie, but a bomber jacket, so I couldn't tell from number of stripes his rank. I didn't record his name/initials. Like I said, he seemed to know the flight attendant in first class well, and did not de-plane immediately so he could chat with her some more when we left the plane.
It took them a week to respond to my complaint, enough time to properly investigate this. While it's possible that I had an incompetent customer service rep who didn't know about deadheading policies, it's just as likely that there were some policy violations and they are trying to cover it up.
I guess we'll never know. But it's kind of fun to speculate.
It took them a week to respond to my complaint, enough time to properly investigate this. While it's possible that I had an incompetent customer service rep who didn't know about deadheading policies, it's just as likely that there were some policy violations and they are trying to cover it up.
I guess we'll never know. But it's kind of fun to speculate.
#26
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 40
Yes, I know it's a short flight, but it's the principles! I didn't ask Alaska for compensations, just want some clarifications on what happened.
I'm a million-miler on UA, and trying to decide whether to switch my business to Alaska Airlines. This just kind of leaves a bad taste in my mouth...
I'm a million-miler on UA, and trying to decide whether to switch my business to Alaska Airlines. This just kind of leaves a bad taste in my mouth...
#27
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near SEA
Programs: UA MM, AS MVPG75K, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,969
Yes, I know it's a short flight, but it's the principles! I didn't ask Alaska for compensations, just want some clarifications on what happened.
I'm a million-miler on UA, and trying to decide whether to switch my business to Alaska Airlines. This just kind of leaves a bad taste in my mouth...
I'm a million-miler on UA, and trying to decide whether to switch my business to Alaska Airlines. This just kind of leaves a bad taste in my mouth...
#28
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 40
I don't understand all the negative remarks here. Maybe everyone on this board loves Alaska and want to give them the benefit of the doubt. That's fine.
Am I the only one who would love to know what actually happened? Their response to me leaves me more puzzled than satisfied.
With a vague policy that says people that kind of look like pilots can be arbitrarily upgraded over anyone on the plane, isn't this subject to abuse? How do I know if someone is properly upgraded over me, or just because he/she is buddy with the gate agent? And if rules are subjective, why should I waste money to earn their status?
Am I the only one who would love to know what actually happened? Their response to me leaves me more puzzled than satisfied.
With a vague policy that says people that kind of look like pilots can be arbitrarily upgraded over anyone on the plane, isn't this subject to abuse? How do I know if someone is properly upgraded over me, or just because he/she is buddy with the gate agent? And if rules are subjective, why should I waste money to earn their status?
#29
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,931
Upgrade Shenanigans? [Consolidated]
I think your frustration is legitimate, and it'd be nice if every airline employee you encountered had encyclopedic knowledge of all rules and policies *and* could communicate them clearly, but I'm not sure that's a realistic expectation.
#30
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 40
FWIW there's a 41 page thread on upgrade shenanigans in the UA forum.
Upgrade Shenanigans? [Consolidated]
I think your frustration is legitimate, and it'd be nice if every airline employee you encountered had encyclopedic knowledge of all rules and policies *and* could communicate them clearly, but I'm not sure that's a realistic expectation.
Upgrade Shenanigans? [Consolidated]
I think your frustration is legitimate, and it'd be nice if every airline employee you encountered had encyclopedic knowledge of all rules and policies *and* could communicate them clearly, but I'm not sure that's a realistic expectation.
I know not everyone at an airline knows all the rules, but if you work at customer service, listening to complaints, I would hope you would know the upgrade procedures well.