Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan
Reload this Page >

PDX Concourse A Closure and Relocation of Horizon to the End of C

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

PDX Concourse A Closure and Relocation of Horizon to the End of C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2019, 10:55 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RDM
Programs: RDM AS 100K - 1MM / DL DM - 3MM / Marriott Ambassador - Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 352
PDX Concourse A Closure and Relocation of Horizon to the End of C

From airliners.net so not verified

PDX TCORE update:

As part of TCORE, we’re closing Concourse A and modifying and expanding Concourse
B. We will relocate Horizon operations to the end of Concourse C which will allow for
the early abandonment of Concourse A. This will allow construction activities on
Concourse-B extension to occur and be isolated from passenger processing and travel.
When construction begins on Concourse B later this fall, Horizon will move operations
to the end of the C Concourse, which steers travelers away from the construction area
and provides more shopping and dining options than are currently available on
Concourse A. The relocation of Horizon operations to Concourse C is currently
scheduled for October 2019 so that it avoids the peak travel season at PDX.
The Hoffman/Skanska team continues to develop and review schedules to determine
early enabling project opportunities and potential tenant impacts. The Concourse B
work is progressing through 90% design; the remodeled and expanded Concourse B is
expected to open in early 2021.




https://popcdn.azureedge.net/pdfs/PDX%2 ... 202019.pdf
jinglish and williwaw like this.
CAVU is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 12:22 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 116
Also, are they ignoring the fact that the concourses will just start at B and there will be no A? Seems like all the concourses should just go one letter down.

Last edited by dayone; Feb 1, 2019 at 2:53 pm Reason: Edited in error.
gobeavs8 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 12:44 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,036
Originally Posted by gobeavs8
Also, are they ignoring the fact that the concourses will just start at B and there will be no A? Seems like all the concourses should just go one letter down.
ONT has terminals 2 and 4 but no 1 or 3. The world is still spinning.
jinglish is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 12:58 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AS 100k, DL PM, New Sagaya
Posts: 1,291
Well, Portland does have 5 quadrants. So we have a history of being special....
jinglish, AS737 and pdx1 like this.
williwaw is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 1:00 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,631
Originally Posted by jinglish
ONT has terminals 2 and 4 but no 1 or 3. The world is still spinning.
Both LHR and PHX have "lost" their T1s. And PHX is about to lose 2, too.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 1:04 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Originally Posted by jinglish
ONT has terminals 2 and 4 but no 1 or 3. The world is still spinning.
PHX has 2, 3 & 4 while 1 terminal is nowhere to be found. Demolished in 1991 after 38 years.




History Here
Flying for Fun is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 1:47 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
I heard someone talking about this last week. This will make the end of C a giant mess. I'm not sure how they're going to park all those airplanes down there, unless they're going to mix the Q400s at gates up and down B & C.

Originally Posted by Flying for Fun
PHX has 2, 3 & 4 while 1 terminal is nowhere to be found.
T1 is still there. Sorta. It's actually a parking lot right now.

If you look at the satellite photos of PHX, you'll see the concrete ramp area, just west of T2. The original tower is at the south side of the airport, located over by Swift Aviation.
Flying for Fun likes this.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 2:53 pm
  #8  
Moderator: Alaska Mileage Plan
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,318
Originally Posted by gobeavs8
Also, are they ignoring the fact that the concourses will just start at B and there will be no A? Seems like all the concourses should just go one letter down.
My memory is that PDX originally had two concourses, B and C.
dayone is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 2:55 pm
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,574
Originally Posted by williwaw
Well, Portland does have 5 quadrants. So we have a history of being special....
North Portland is such a snowflake...
pinniped is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 3:20 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SEA
Programs: Hilton/Marriott Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 2,036
Originally Posted by williwaw
Well, Portland does have 5 quadrants. So we have a history of being special....
Soon to be six!
MapMan25 and pdx1 like this.
jinglish is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2019, 6:35 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
Yay! A Dungeon to be replaced by B Dungeon! Sure wish those sketches won't reflect the actual interior layout and seating but this is the Port of Portland.

Perhaps the bit of silver lining is only 6 aircraft positions for ground loading at B. That's quite the cut from the current number. Hopefully that means E175s will be at jet bridges elsewhere with only dwindling Q400s out there. Still looks like the same single sided walkway design so it's longer than it would need to be if using both sides of the walkway (like SEA).

Last edited by rustykettel; Feb 3, 2019 at 11:51 am
rustykettel is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 11:21 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 22
Oh great. Twice as long as a walk from security to the end of C vs. A.

What they *should* do as part of the new B terminal is add a MAX-passenger only TSA screening point. That would be a great way to encourage using mass transit. Tons of pax who don't need to interact with anyone landside before going airside.
scfw0x0f is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 11:30 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: AS 100k, DL PM, New Sagaya
Posts: 1,291
Originally Posted by scfw0x0f

What they *should* do as part of the new B terminal is add a MAX-passenger only TSA screening point. That would be a great way to encourage using mass transit. Tons of pax who don't need to interact with anyone landside before going airside.
This would be amazing.
MapMan25 and Idaho Territory like this.
williwaw is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 10:30 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, OR
Programs: AS 100k, UA Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 228
Originally Posted by scfw0x0f
Oh great. Twice as long as a walk from security to the end of C vs. A.

What they *should* do as part of the new B terminal is add a MAX-passenger only TSA screening point. That would be a great way to encourage using mass transit. Tons of pax who don't need to interact with anyone landside before going airside.
I love the idea of a TSA screening point to concourse B from the MAX stop but why should it discriminate against those of us who cannot access a MAX line and need to drive to PDX? Let anyone use the checkpoint, not just MAX riders.
jinglish likes this.
DuckFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 10:43 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,371
Originally Posted by DuckFlyer
I love the idea of a TSA screening point to concourse B from the MAX stop but why should it discriminate against those of us who cannot access a MAX line and need to drive to PDX? Let anyone use the checkpoint, not just MAX riders.
as one who has originated PDX exactly 5x in the past five years (twice returning a rental car, twice via hotel shuttles, and once via MAX), I don’t really have a stake in this debate, but I wholeheartedly agree with this “why limit it?” premise
jrl767 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.