FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Air Canada | Aeroplan (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan-375/)
-   -   Booked Standard, showing as Basic (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/air-canada-aeroplan/1970485-booked-standard-showing-basic.html)

sokolov May 20, 2019 2:41 am

Booked Standard, showing as Basic
 
Hello,

A couple of days ago, I booked an Economy flight on AC from Canada to the US. During the booking process on the Air Canada Website, in the confirmation e-mail, and in the attached Air Canada Booking Confirmation PDF all segments show(ed) as Economy Standard.

However, when I check my booking on the Air Canada website, my itinerary is suddenly showing as Economy Basic. I can't find the fare code anywhere, but during the booking process it ended in TG.

I did not book Basic and I don't want Basic. Is this a known issue with the Air Canada website? What should I do?

Thank you.

canadiancow May 20, 2019 9:35 am

Either use Saudia.com or call in to verify.

ksm06 May 20, 2019 10:52 am

Similar situation - my guess is the mapping is messed up on some fares with how they display when you look them up again. I have a few tickets that I swore were booked in Economy Flex and when I go to manage my bookings show as Standard now. I took CC's advice above and looked at Saudia with my ticket no. and still see all the legs showing as FL fares. I will wait and see what ultimately posts and then write in if I need the mileage adjusted.

sokolov May 20, 2019 11:18 am


Originally Posted by canadiancow (Post 31119840)
Either use Saudia.com or call in to verify.

I checked there, and the fare code has changed from TG to BA. Air Canada switched that out after sending me the booking confirmation!

I have contacted the AC Twitter team. They wanted to see screenshots of my booking (which I provided, from the PDF I had received), and now they have sent the case to the Web Team, whatever that means.

eigenvector May 20, 2019 3:06 pm

This is troubling, as most people assume that what they book (and explicitly pay extra for) stays intact and doesn't silently change to a cheaper fare. Please update us on how it goes.

sokolov May 25, 2019 12:38 am

AC surely is taking their time to fix this. They tell me they are "investigating". Good, they should, but I don't feel like I should have to sit this out.
:-(

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,
  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or
  • (b) is guilty
    • (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
    • (ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,
    where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

    ​​​​​​Just sayin'.

canadiancow May 25, 2019 5:29 am


Originally Posted by sokolov (Post 31136866)
AC surely is taking their time to fix this. They tell me they are "investigating". Good, they should, but I don't feel like I should have to sit this out.
:-(

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,
  • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or
  • (b) is guilty
    • (i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
    • (ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,
    where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

    ​​​​​​Just sayin'.

While I generally like people who bring the law into these matters, Hanlon's razor is almost certainly correct here. None of that law would apply.

sokolov May 25, 2019 10:57 pm


Originally Posted by canadiancow (Post 31137257)
While I generally like people who bring the law into these matters, Hanlon's razor is almost certainly correct here. None of that law would apply.

If it's a mistake and they fix it, I would agree. However, it's been a week and they haven't fixed it. They even refuse to call me back.

They were also trying to tell me that I would not get any of the *A Gold advantages with Standard Economy anyway.

They now say they would allow me to change the ticket for a fee - which is a start, but still not what I paid for.

trek604 May 26, 2019 12:39 pm

They did this to one of my recent segment run trips. Luckily I checked the next day after booking and noticed it changed from fare basis TG to BA. I was able to cancel it within the 24 hour window... But yes, the original itinerary PDF all listed Standard. Very sleazy.

Jumper Jack May 26, 2019 12:50 pm

This happened to me twice but it was:
Flex to Standard
Corporate TA

I thought it was corporate TA over-ride so did not say anything

Matt93 May 27, 2019 2:03 pm

This happened to me on a trip YXU-YYZ-MUC RT. I have the PDF showing Economy-Standard but when my flights posted to Altitude it is showing as BASIC.

yyznomad May 30, 2019 3:58 pm

Can someone post screenshots of the Before and After (can be initial PDF and then how it shows online or saudia.com or whatever)? (TG -> BA or any other like FL->TG)

ksm06 May 30, 2019 5:13 pm

My first round trip with this issue has now posted and I did get the flex aqd and aqm, I have this one outstanding and still see FL fare code in Saudia but economy standard on AC. Wonder if having an eup request has anything to do with it? Anyways I will try to post the screenshots. Apologies on my mobile so not sure if this will work. This was booked through Corp TA CWT.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...34200ede5.jpeg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...1bf34bbe7.jpeg

yyznomad May 30, 2019 5:35 pm


Originally Posted by ksm06 (Post 31155079)
My first round trip with this issue has now posted and I did get the flex aqd and aqm, I have this one outstanding and still see FL fare code in Saudia but economy standard on AC. Wonder if having an eup request has anything to do with it? Anyways I will try to post the screenshots. Apologies on my mobile so not sure if this will work. This was booked through Corp TA CWT.



Thanks for the pics.

When you say you "did get the flex aqd and aqm", was this after filing a missing aqd form, or did it just post naturally as flex without any intervention?

I'm also curious what others' fare bases are/were that show these discrepancies.

ksm06 May 30, 2019 5:46 pm

I didn’t have to fill in the forms or contact anyone.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:21 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.