Originally Posted by
cynicalflyer
He's inventing a case in his own mind based on a single news article, the terms of which admit that court never ruled in favor of plaintiffs.
He's making it up.
Originally Posted by
cynicalflyer
Answer: neither has anything to do with this. The AA suit was settled without a court ruling against AA. GU thinks the court did, but his own article admits AA settled the suit for pennies on the dollar rather than having it go to judgement.
You can continue to try to tell us what I think .... but don't be surprised if I get in the way of your wrongful claims. Reading minds isn't a scientific skillset.
