Originally Posted by
GUWonder
An "improper and unequal comparison" is not an applicable characterization to what I mentioned, especially as the mentioned item involved an airline, a frequent flyer program, changes to a frequent flyer program, and the airline's attempt to hide behind the terms and conditions in trying to defend itself from consumers asserting their legal rights in the face of airline unilterally making adjustments to the FFP.
No, what makes it improper and unequal is your assertion that a court found for plaintiffs and against AA.
None did. Even your own news article proved that.
Try again.